Robotic Single-Site Sacrocolpopexy with Retroperitoneal Tunneling

被引:18
|
作者
Liu, Juan [1 ,4 ]
Bardawil, Elise [1 ]
Zurawin, Robert K. [3 ]
Wu, Junwei [4 ]
Fu, Huaying [4 ]
Orejuela, Francisco [2 ]
Guan, Xiaoming [1 ]
机构
[1] Baylor Coll Med, Sect Minimally Invas Gynecol Surg, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Baylor Coll Med, Div Urogynecol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Baylor Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 6651 Main St,10th Floor, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Guangzhou Med Univ, Guangzhou Shi, Peoples R China
关键词
Pelvic organ prolapse; Retroperitoneal tunneling technique; Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site (R-LESS); Sacrocolpopexy; V-Loc suture; ASSISTED VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; LEARNING-CURVE; STANDARDIZATION; FEASIBILITY; CANCER; TRIAL;
D O I
10.4293/JSLS.2018.00009
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: This series of cases was an investigation of the safety and feasibility of robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (R-LESS) as a method of performing sacrocolpopexy. Case Presentation: This is a retrospective series of 15 cases of R-LESS sacrocolpopexy with the V-Loc (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA) suture and a retroperitoneal tunneling technique performed by a single surgeon, combined with a literature review. Patient demographic information and perioperative data were analyzed. The standard robotic sacrocolpopexy steps were followed, but the surgeon used a combined technique of V-Loc suture and retroperitoneal tunneling to simplify the procedure. No additional ports were necessary in any of the patients. Management and Outcome: Using the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) scoring method, the mean preoperative C-point of the 15 patients was +1.16 compared to the mean immediate postoperative C-point, which was -5.5. The mean total sacrocolpopexy time was 74.7 (range, 50-99) minutes and mean mesh anchoring time was 22.60 +/- 3.85 minutes. The mean sacral promontory fixation and tunneling and mesh position times were 11.87 +/- 3.02 and 5.80 +/- 2.14 minutes, respectively. All 15 cases were performed without perioperative or long-term complications. Discussion: R-LESS in combination with the V-Loc suture and the retroperitoneal tunneling technique can be safely and feasibly performed, especially in sacrocolpopexy and, potentially, in other POP surgeries. With adequate and systematic training, surgeons can acquire the necessary skills to perform this complex surgical procedure.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Robotic Single-Site® Sacrocolpopexy: First Report and Technique Using the Single-Site® Wristed Needle Driver
    Lee, Sa Ra
    YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 57 (04) : 1029 - 1033
  • [2] Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse
    Matanes, Emad
    Boulus, Sari
    Lauterbach, Roy
    Amit, Amnon
    Weiner, Zeev
    Lowenstein, Lior
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 222 (04) : 358.e1 - 358.e11
  • [3] Robotic Single-Site Sacrocolpopexy Using Barbed Suture Anchoring and Peritoneal Tunneling Technique: Tips and Tricks
    Guan, Xiaoming
    Ma, Yingchun
    Gisseman, Jordan
    Kleithermes, Christopher
    Liu, Juan
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 24 (01) : 12 - 13
  • [4] EAU Guidelines on Robotic and Single-site Surgery in Urology
    Merseburger, Axel S.
    Herrmann, Thomas R. W.
    Shariat, Shahrokh F.
    Kyriazis, Iason
    Nagele, Udo
    Traxer, Olivier
    Liatsikos, Evangelos N.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2013, 64 (02) : 277 - 291
  • [5] Robotic single-site adrenalectomy
    Lee, Grace S.
    Arghami, Arman
    Dy, Benzon M.
    McKenzie, Travis J.
    Thompson, Geoffrey B.
    Richards, Melanie L.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2016, 30 (08): : 3351 - 3356
  • [6] Robotic single-site versus laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery for adnexal tumours: a propensity score-matching analysis
    Paek, Jiheum
    Lee, Jung-Dong
    Kong, Tae Wook
    Chang, Suk-Joon
    Ryu, Hee-Sug
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2016, 12 (04): : 694 - 700
  • [7] Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology: A systematic review
    Matanes, Emad
    Lauterbach, Roy
    Boulus, Sari
    Amit, Amnon
    Lowenstein, Lior
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2018, 231 : 1 - 7
  • [8] Robotic single-site versus laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy: a propensity score matching study
    Paek, Jiheum
    Lee, Jung-Dong
    Kong, Tae Wook
    Chang, Suk-Joon
    Ryu, Hee-Sug
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2016, 30 (03): : 1043 - 1050
  • [9] Single port robotic assisted sacrocolpopexy: technique and tips
    Lauren Griebel
    M. Misal
    J. Cornella
    A. Khan
    C. Wolter
    J. Yi
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2022, 33 : 2905 - 2905
  • [10] Robotic sacrocolpopexy
    Danforth, Teresa L.
    Aron, Monish
    Ginsberg, David A.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 30 (03) : 318 - 325