Toward sustainable supply chains: impact of buyer's legitimacy, power and aligned focus on supplier sustainability performance

被引:35
作者
Ahmed, Muhammad Usman [1 ]
Shafiq, Asad [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Sch Management, Flint, MI 48503 USA
[2] Calif State Univ Fullerton, Mihaylo Coll Business & Econ, Fullerton, CA 92634 USA
关键词
Stakeholder salience; Sustainability performance; Buyer-supplier dyad; CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; COLLABORATION; CAPABILITIES; INFORMATION; INTEGRATION; MANAGEMENT; INNOVATION; ADVANTAGE; BENEFITS; CSR;
D O I
10.1108/IJOPM-08-2021-0540
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose As large multinational firms are increasingly tasked with developing sustainable supply chains, their role in improving the sustainability performance of their suppliers is critical. This paper examines the dual role of a buyer firm, as a customer and as an important stakeholder, and identifies several attributes of the buyer firm and the dyadic relationship that could help improve the sustainability performance of suppliers. Design/methodology/approach A dyadic multi-year dataset is created using financial and customer data from the Compustat database and sustainability data from MSCI ESG ratings database. The hypotheses are tested using econometric panel data techniques. Findings The findings indicate that a buyer's legitimacy is a key factor that affects supplier's sustainability performance. The effect of legitimacy is much higher when the buyer and supplier firms have an aligned focus on similar sustainability dimensions. The market power of the buyer also increases the effect of legitimacy, though power without legitimacy is not effective. Originality/value The study expands the understanding of how buyer firms can influence suppliers on sustainability by highlighting the key role played by legitimacy and aligned focus and the supporting role of market power. The study contributes to both the stakeholder salience literature and the buyer-supplier relationship literature by showing evidence for complementarity between market power and legitimacy. Buyer firms can use the results of the study to focus their efforts on suppliers where a significant improvement in sustainability can be expected.
引用
收藏
页码:280 / 303
页数:24
相关论文
共 100 条
[91]   On the Same Page? How Asymmetric Buyer-Supplier Relationships Affect Opportunism and Performance [J].
Villena, Veronica H. ;
Craighead, Christopher W. .
PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2017, 26 (03) :491-508
[92]  
Waddock SA, 1997, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V18, P303, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199704)18:4<303::AID-SMJ869>3.0.CO
[93]  
2-G
[94]   Supplier relationship-specific investments and the role of safeguards for supplier innovation sharing [J].
Wagner, Stephan M. ;
Bode, Christoph .
JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2014, 32 (03) :65-78
[95]  
Weber Max., 1968, THEORY SOCIAL EC ORG
[96]   Cascading Sustainability in Multi-tier Supply Chains: When Do Chinese Suppliers Adopt Sustainable Procurement? [J].
Wilhelm, Miriam ;
Villena, Veronica H. .
PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2021, 30 (11) :4198-4218
[97]  
Wooldridge J., 2008, INTRO ECONOMETRICS M
[98]   The impact of power and relationship commitment on the integration between manufacturers and customers in a supply chain [J].
Zhao, Xiande ;
Huo, Baofeng ;
Flynn, Barbara B. ;
Yeung, Jeff Hoi Yan .
JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2008, 26 (03) :368-388
[99]   How supply chain analytics enables operational supply chain transparency: An organizational information processing theory perspective [J].
Zhu, Suning ;
Song, Jiahe ;
Hazen, Benjamin T. ;
Lee, Kang ;
Cegielski, Casey .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL DISTRIBUTION & LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT, 2018, 48 (01) :47-68
[100]   Socially responsible sourcing: reviewing the literature and its use of theory [J].
Zorzini, Marta ;
Hendry, Linda C. ;
Huq, Fahian Anisul ;
Stevenson, Mark .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2015, 35 (01) :60-109