An Analysis Framework for Electronic Health Record Systems Interoperation and Collaboration in Shared Healthcare

被引:15
|
作者
Bisbal, J. [1 ]
Berry, D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pompeu Fabra, Dept ICT, Barcelona 08003, Spain
[2] Dublin Inst Technol, Dept Control Elect Engn, Dublin, Ireland
关键词
Electronic health records; analysis; comparison; framework; two-level modeling; archetypes; integration; interoperability; semantic interoperability; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; DATA INTEGRATION; 21ST-CENTURY; HOSPITALS; IMPACT; STATE;
D O I
10.3414/ME09-01-0002
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Background: The timely provision of complete and up-to-date patient data to clinicians has for decades been one of the most pressing objectives to be fulfilled by information technology in the healthcare domain. The so-called electronic health record (EHR), which provides a unified view of all relevant clinical data, has received much attention in this context from both research and industry. This situation has given rise to a large number of research projects and commercial products that aim to address this challenge. Different projects and initiatives have attempted to address this challenge from various points of view, which are not easily comparable. Objectives: This paper aims to clarify the challenges, concepts, and approaches involved, which is essential in order to consistently compare existing solutions and objectively assess progress in the field. Methods: This is achieved by two different means. Firstly, the paper will identify the most significant issues that differentiate the points of view and intended scope of existing approaches. As a result, a framework for analysis of EHR systems will be produced. Secondly, the most representative EHR-related projects and initiatives will be described and compared within the context of this framework. Results: The main result of the present paper is an analysis framework for EHR systems. This is intended as an initial step towards an attempt to structure research on this field, clearly lacking sound principles to evaluate and compare results, and ultimately focusing its efforts and being able to objectively evaluate scientific progress. Conclusions: Evaluation and comparison of results in medical informatics, and specifically EHR systems, must address technical and nontechnical aspects. It is challenging to condensate in a single framework all potential views of such a field, and any chosen approach is bound to have its limitations. That being said, any well structured comparison approach, such as the framework presented here, is better than no comparison framework at all, as has been the current situation to date. This paper has presented the first attempt known to the authors to define such a framework.
引用
收藏
页码:180 / 189
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] MedicalForms: Integrated Management of Semantics for Electronic Health Record Systems and Research Platforms
    Moreno-Conde, Jesus
    Salas-Fernandez, Samuel
    Moreno-Conde, Alberto
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (09):
  • [42] Adoption of electronic health record systems to enhance the quality of healthcare in low-income countries: a systematic review
    Woldemariam, Misganaw Tadesse
    Jimma, Worku
    BMJ HEALTH & CARE INFORMATICS, 2023, 30 (01)
  • [43] Quantitative ethnographic study of physician workflow and interactions with electronic health record systems
    Asan, Onur
    Chiou, Erin
    Montague, Enid
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ERGONOMICS, 2015, 49 : 124 - 130
  • [44] Usability Analysis of Archetyped Interfaces for the Electronic Health Record: a Comparative Study
    Alves, Danielle Santos
    Times, Valeria Cesario
    Costa de Araujo, Andre Magno
    da Silva, Marcus Urbano
    Campos Filho, Amadeu Sa
    Novaes, Magdala de Araujo
    ACHI 2017: THE TENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN COMPUTER-HUMAN INTERACTIONS, 2017, : 169 - 175
  • [45] Value alignment?s role in mitigating resistance to IT use: The case of physicians?resistance to electronic health record systems
    Heath, Michele
    Appan, Radha
    Henry, Raymond
    INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 2022, 59 (08)
  • [46] Are physicians' perceptions of healthcare quality and practice satisfaction affected by errors associated with electronic health record use?
    Love, Jennifer S.
    Wright, Adam
    Simon, Steven R.
    Jenter, Chelsea A.
    Soran, Christine S.
    Volk, Lynn A.
    Bates, David W.
    Poon, Eric G.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2012, 19 (04) : 610 - 614
  • [47] Interdisciplinary systems may restore the healthcare professional-patient relationship in electronic health systems
    Cauley, Michael R.
    Boland Jr, Richard J.
    Rosenbloom, S. Trent
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2025,
  • [48] Aguhyper: a hyperledger-based electronic health record management framework
    Dedeturk B.A.
    Bakir-Gungor B.
    PeerJ Computer Science, 2024, 10 : 1 - 33
  • [49] Blockchain-Based Interoperable Electronic Health Record Sharing Framework
    Carter, Gracie
    Shahriar, Hossain
    Sneha, Sweta
    2019 IEEE 43RD ANNUAL COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND APPLICATIONS CONFERENCE (COMPSAC), VOL 2, 2019, : 452 - 457
  • [50] Analysis of the Updated Swedish Regulatory Framework of the Patient Accessible Electronic Health Record in Relation to Usage Experience
    Scandurra, Isabella
    Pettersson, Maria
    Eklund, Benny
    Lyttkens, Leif
    MEDINFO 2017: PRECISION HEALTHCARE THROUGH INFORMATICS, 2017, 245 : 798 - 802