An Analysis Framework for Electronic Health Record Systems Interoperation and Collaboration in Shared Healthcare

被引:15
|
作者
Bisbal, J. [1 ]
Berry, D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pompeu Fabra, Dept ICT, Barcelona 08003, Spain
[2] Dublin Inst Technol, Dept Control Elect Engn, Dublin, Ireland
关键词
Electronic health records; analysis; comparison; framework; two-level modeling; archetypes; integration; interoperability; semantic interoperability; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; DATA INTEGRATION; 21ST-CENTURY; HOSPITALS; IMPACT; STATE;
D O I
10.3414/ME09-01-0002
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Background: The timely provision of complete and up-to-date patient data to clinicians has for decades been one of the most pressing objectives to be fulfilled by information technology in the healthcare domain. The so-called electronic health record (EHR), which provides a unified view of all relevant clinical data, has received much attention in this context from both research and industry. This situation has given rise to a large number of research projects and commercial products that aim to address this challenge. Different projects and initiatives have attempted to address this challenge from various points of view, which are not easily comparable. Objectives: This paper aims to clarify the challenges, concepts, and approaches involved, which is essential in order to consistently compare existing solutions and objectively assess progress in the field. Methods: This is achieved by two different means. Firstly, the paper will identify the most significant issues that differentiate the points of view and intended scope of existing approaches. As a result, a framework for analysis of EHR systems will be produced. Secondly, the most representative EHR-related projects and initiatives will be described and compared within the context of this framework. Results: The main result of the present paper is an analysis framework for EHR systems. This is intended as an initial step towards an attempt to structure research on this field, clearly lacking sound principles to evaluate and compare results, and ultimately focusing its efforts and being able to objectively evaluate scientific progress. Conclusions: Evaluation and comparison of results in medical informatics, and specifically EHR systems, must address technical and nontechnical aspects. It is challenging to condensate in a single framework all potential views of such a field, and any chosen approach is bound to have its limitations. That being said, any well structured comparison approach, such as the framework presented here, is better than no comparison framework at all, as has been the current situation to date. This paper has presented the first attempt known to the authors to define such a framework.
引用
收藏
页码:180 / 189
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Special Requirements for Electronic Health Record Systems in Ophthalmology
    Chiang, Michael F.
    Boland, Michael V.
    Brewer, Allen
    Epley, K. David
    Horton, Mark B.
    Lim, Michele C.
    McCannel, Colin A.
    Patel, Sayjal J.
    Silverstone, David E.
    Wedemeyer, Linda
    Lum, Flora
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2011, 118 (08) : 1681 - 1687
  • [32] Diffusion and use of Electronic Health Record Systems in Norway
    Heimly, Vigdis
    Grimsmo, Anders
    Henningsen, Trond Palmer
    Faxvaag, Arild
    MEDINFO 2010, PTS I AND II, 2010, 160 : 381 - 385
  • [33] Generating Clinical Notes for Electronic Health Record Systems
    Rosenbloom, S. T.
    Stead, W. W.
    Denny, J. C.
    Giuse, D.
    Lorenzi, N. M.
    Brown, S. H.
    Johnson, K. B.
    APPLIED CLINICAL INFORMATICS, 2010, 1 (03): : 232 - 243
  • [34] Promises and pitfalls of electronic health record analysis
    Ruth Farmer
    Rohini Mathur
    Krishnan Bhaskaran
    Sophie V. Eastwood
    Nish Chaturvedi
    Liam Smeeth
    Diabetologia, 2018, 61 : 1241 - 1248
  • [35] Quality Labelling and Certification of Electronic Health Record Systems
    Bruun-Rasmussen, Morten
    Bernstein, Knut
    Vingtoft, Soren
    Nohr, Christian
    Andersen, Stig Kjaer
    CONNECTING MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND BIO-INFORMATICS, 2005, 116 : 47 - 52
  • [36] Association of Electronic Health Record Vendors With Hospital Financial and Quality Performance: Retrospective Data Analysis
    Beauvais, Bradley
    Kruse, Clemens Scott
    Fulton, Lawrence
    Shanmugam, Ramalingam
    Ramamonjiarivelo, Zo
    Brooks, Matthew
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (04)
  • [37] BigTexts A Framework for the Analysis of Electronic Health Record Narrative Texts based on Big Data Technologies
    Calderon, Wilson Alzate
    Quimbaya, Alexandra Pomares
    Gonzalez, Rafael A.
    Munoz, Oscar Mauricio
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR AGEING WELL AND E-HEALTH (ICT4AGEINGWELL), 2015, : 129 - 136
  • [38] Promises and pitfalls of electronic health record analysis
    Farmer, Ruth
    Mathur, Rohini
    Bhaskaran, Krishnan
    Eastwood, Sophie V.
    Chaturvedi, Nish
    Smeeth, Liam
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2018, 61 (06) : 1241 - 1248
  • [39] Assessment of Electronic Health Record Use Between US and Non-US Health Systems
    Holmgren, A. Jay
    Downing, N. Lance
    Bates, David W.
    Shanafelt, Tait D.
    Milstein, Arnold
    Sharp, Christopher D.
    Cutler, David M.
    Huckman, Robert S.
    Schulman, Kevin A.
    JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2021, 181 (02) : 251 - 259
  • [40] Storing and interpreting genomic information in widely deployed electronic health record systems
    Ury, Andrew G.
    GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2013, 15 (10) : 779 - 785