The role of the noradrenergic system in the exploration-exploitation trade-off: a psychopharmacological study

被引:30
作者
Jepma, Marieke [1 ,2 ]
Beek, Erik T. Te [3 ]
Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan [4 ]
van Gerven, Joop M. A. [3 ]
Nieuwenhuis, Sander [2 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Dept Psychol, Cognit Psychol Unit, Inst Psychol Res, NL-2333 AK Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Inst Brain & Cognit, Leiden, Netherlands
[3] Ctr Human Drug Res, Leiden, Netherlands
[4] Univ Amsterdam, ACACIA, Swammerdam Inst Life Sci, Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
norepinephrine; locus coeruleus; cognitive control; exploration; decision making; reboxetine; SEROTONIN REUPTAKE INHIBITORS; LOCUS-COERULEUS; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; ADAPTIVE GAIN; REBOXETINE; MODULATION; ANTIDEPRESSANT; NOREPINEPHRINE; NORADRENALINE; MODEL;
D O I
10.3389/fnhum.2010.00170
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Animal research and computational modeling have indicated an important role for the neuromodulatory locus coeruleus-norepinephrine (LC-NE) system in the control of behavior. According to the adaptive gain theory, the LC-NE system is critical for optimizing behavioral performance by regulating the balance between exploitative and exploratory control states. However, crucial direct empirical tests of this theory in human subjects have been lacking. We used a pharmacological manipulation of the LC-NE system to test predictions of this theory in humans. In a double-blind parallel-groups design (N = 52), participants received 4 mg reboxetine (a selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor), 30 mg citalopram (a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor), or placebo. The adaptive gain theory predicted that the increased tonic NE levels induced by reboxetine would promote task disengagement and exploratory behavior. We assessed the effects of reboxetine on performance in two cognitive tasks designed to examine task (dis)engagement and exploitative versus exploratory behavior: a diminishing-utility task and a gambling task with a non-stationary pay-off structure. In contrast to predictions of the adaptive gain theory, we did not find differences in task (dis) engagement or exploratory behavior between the three experimental groups, despite demonstrable effects of the two drugs on non-specific central and autonomic nervous system parameters. Our findings suggest that the LC-NE system may not be involved in the regulation of the exploration-exploitation trade-off in humans, at least not within the context of a single task. It remains to be examined whether the LC-NE system is involved in random exploration exceeding the current task context.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   Frequency-dependent synchrony in locus ceruleus: Role of electrotonic coupling [J].
Alvarez, VA ;
Chow, CC ;
Van Bockstaele, EJ ;
Williams, JT .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2002, 99 (06) :4032-4036
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1993, An introduction to the bootstrap
[3]   An integrative theory of locus coeruleus-norepinephrine function: Adaptive gain and optimal performance [J].
Aston-Jones, G ;
Cohen, JD .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2005, 28 :403-450
[4]  
Aston-Jones G., 2004, RAT NERVOUS SYSTEM, P259, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-012547638-6/50012-2
[5]  
Aston-Jones G., 1984, FRONTIERS CLIN NEURO, V2, P92
[6]  
AstonJones G, 1996, PROG BRAIN RES, V107, P379
[7]   Conditioned responses of monkey locus coeruleus neurons anticipate acquisition of discriminative behavior in a vigilance task [J].
AstonJones, G ;
Rajkowski, J ;
Kubiak, P .
NEUROSCIENCE, 1997, 80 (03) :697-715
[8]   Learning the value of information in an uncertain world [J].
Behrens, Timothy E. J. ;
Woolrich, Mark W. ;
Walton, Mark E. ;
Rushworth, Matthew F. S. .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2007, 10 (09) :1214-1221
[9]   Anxiety and cardiovascular reactivity: the basal forebrain cholinergic link [J].
Berntson, GG ;
Sarter, M ;
Cacioppo, JT .
BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1998, 94 (02) :225-248
[10]   The locus coeruleus-noradrenergic system: modulation of behavioral state and state-dependent cognitive processes [J].
Berridge, CW ;
Waterhouse, BD .
BRAIN RESEARCH REVIEWS, 2003, 42 (01) :33-84