Guiding practitioners through end of life care for people with dementia: The use of heuristics

被引:25
作者
Davies, Nathan [1 ,2 ]
Manthorpe, Jill [3 ]
Sampson, Elizabeth L. [2 ,4 ]
Lamahewa, Kethakie [1 ]
Wilcock, Jane [1 ]
Mathew, Rammya [1 ]
Iliffe, Steve [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Res Dept Primary Care & Populat Hlth, London, England
[2] UCL, Div Psychiat, Marie Curie Palliat Care Res Dept, Ctr Dementia Palliat Care Res, London, England
[3] Kings Coll London, Social Care Workforce Res Unit, London, England
[4] North Middlesex Univ Hosp, Barnet Enfield & Haringey Mental Hlth Trust Liais, London, England
关键词
PALLIATIVE CARE; HEALTH-CARE; OF-LIFE; QUALITY; EXPERIENCE; PATIENT; DESIGN; DEATH;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0206422
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background End of life care (EOLC) for people with dementia can present a multitude of challenges and difficult decisions for practitioners. These challenges may include assessment and management of difficulties with eating and swallowing, responding to agitation, treating pain, and managing recurrent infections. Practitioners sometimes lack both confidence in making end of life decisions and guidance. This study developed an alternative to lengthy guidelines, in the form of heuristics which were tested in clinical settings. The aim of this study was to test the usability and acceptability of a set of heuristics which could be used by practitioners providing EOLC for people with dementia in a variety of clinical and care settings. Methods A three phase co-design process was adopted: 1) Synthesis of evidence and outputs from interviews and focus groups with family carers and practitioners, by a co-design group, to develop heuristics; 2) Testing of the heuristics in five clinical or care settings for six months; 3) Evaluation of the heuristics at three and six months using qualitative individual and group interviews. Results Four heuristics were developed covering: eating and swallowing difficulties, agitation and restlessness, reviewing treatment and interventions at the end of life, and providing routine care. The five sites reported that the heuristics were simple and easy to use, comprehensive, and made implicit, tacit knowledge explicit. Four themes emerged from the qualitative evaluation: authority and permission; synthesis of best practice; providing a structure and breaking down complexity; and reassurance and instilling confidence. Conclusion Use of heuristics is a novel approach to end of life decision making in dementia which can be useful to both experienced and junior members of staff making decisions. Heuristics are a practical tool which could overcome a lack of care pathways and direct guidance in end of life care for people with dementia.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Alzheimer's Disease International, 2016, BIBL REF NAT PLANS
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, CAR ACT PLAN 2018 20
[3]  
Banerjee S., 2009, Living well with dementia: A national Dementia Strategy
[4]   Living in uncertain times: trajectories to death in residential care homes [J].
Barclay, Stephen ;
Froggatt, Katherine ;
Crang, Clare ;
Mathie, Elspeth ;
Handley, Melanie ;
Iliffe, Steve ;
Manthorpe, Jill ;
Gage, Heather ;
Goodman, Claire .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2014, 64 (626) :E576-E583
[5]   Experience-based design: from redesigning the system around the patient to co-designing services with the patient [J].
Bate, Paul ;
Robert, Glenn .
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2006, 15 (05) :307-310
[6]   A critical literature review exploring the challenges of delivering effective palliative care to older people with dementia [J].
Birch, Deborah ;
Draper, Jan .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2008, 17 (09) :1144-1163
[7]   Cognitive Biases and Heuristics in Medical Decision Making: A Critical Review Using a Systematic Search Strategy [J].
Blumenthal-Barby, J. S. ;
Krieger, Heather .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2015, 35 (04) :539-557
[8]   Heuristics: foundations for a novel approach to medical decision making [J].
Bodemer, Nicolai ;
Hanoch, Yaniv ;
Katsikopoulos, Konstantinos V. .
INTERNAL AND EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2015, 10 (02) :195-203
[9]  
Boyd H, 2012, NEW ZEAL MED J, V125, P76
[10]  
Braun V., 2006, QUAL RES PSYCHOL, V3, P77, DOI [10.1191/1478088706qp063oa, DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA]