Comparison of outcomes among secondary covered metallic, uncovered metallic, and plastic biliary stents in treating occluded primary metallic stents in malignant distal biliary obstruction

被引:26
作者
Cho, Jae Hee [1 ,3 ]
Jeon, Tae Joo [1 ,4 ]
Park, Jeong Youp [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Hee Man [1 ,3 ]
Kim, Yoon Jae [1 ,5 ]
Park, Seung Woo [1 ,2 ]
Chung, Jae Bock [1 ,2 ]
Song, Si Young [1 ,2 ]
Bang, Seungmin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Dept Internal Med, Grad Sch, Coll Med, 250 Seongsanno,134 Sinchon Dong, Seoul 120752, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Dept Internal Med, Inst Gastroenterol, Coll Med, Seoul 120752, South Korea
[3] Kwandong Univ, Div Gastroenterol, Dept Internal Med, Myongji Hosp,Coll Med, Goyang, South Korea
[4] Inje Univ, Div Gastroenterol, Dept Internal Med, Sanggye Paik Hosp,Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Gachon Univ, Div Gastroenterol, Dept Internal Med, Gil Med Ctr, Inchon, South Korea
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2011年 / 25卷 / 02期
关键词
Malignant biliary obstruction; Self-expandable metallic stent; Plastic stent; Occlusion; Stent patency; Survival; COMMON BILE-DUCT; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; ENDOSCOPIC MANAGEMENT; ENDOPROSTHESIS; PALLIATION; WALLSTENTS;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-010-1196-6
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) has been widely used for unresectable malignant biliary obstruction but eventually becomes occluded by tumor ingrowth/overgrowth and sludge. Therefore, we aimed to determine the therapeutic effectiveness of secondary stents and to find differences according to various combinations of the first and second stents for the management of occluded SEMSs in patients with malignant distal biliary obstruction. Between 1999 and November 2008, 77 patients with malignant biliary obstruction underwent secondary biliary stent placement as "stent-in-stent" at three university hospitals in Korea (40 covered, 26 uncovered, and 11 plastic stents). The membrane of the covered SEMS was regarded as the barrier against tumor ingrowth. We categorized the patients into three groups based on whether the covered SEMS was either the first or the second stent: membrane-SEMS (18 covered-covered; 9 covered-uncovered; 22 uncovered-covered SEMS), bare-SEMS (17 uncovered-uncovered SEMS), and plastic stent (3 covered-plastic; 8 uncovered-plastic). The median patency of second stents was 138, 109, and 88 days (covered, uncovered, and plastic stents). The second covered SEMSs had a significantly longer patency than plastic stents (p = 0.047). In a multivariate analysis including membrane-SEMS, bare-SEMS, and plastic stent groups, the bare-SEMS had a worse cumulative stent patency (HR = 2.04, CI = 1.08-3.86) and survival time (HR = 2.37, CI = 1.25-4.49) than the membrane-SEMS. Patients with ampulla of Vater cancer had better stent patency (HR = 0.27, CI = 0.08-0.98) and survival (HR = 0.17, CI = 0.04-0.77) than those with other pancreatobiliary malignancies. In addition, antitumor treatment prolonged survival time (HR = 0.50, CI = 0.26-0.99). The placement of additional biliary stents using the "stent-in-stent" method is an effective treatment for an occluded metallic primary stent. In addition, double biliary SEMS placement using at least one covered SEMS (in the primary and/or secondary procedure) might provide longer cumulative stent patency and survival than using uncovered SEMSs in both procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:475 / 482
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Arguedas MR, 2002, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V97, P898
  • [2] Nitinol biliary stent versus surgery for palliation of distal malignant biliary obstruction
    Castano, Rodrigo
    Lopes, Tercio L.
    Alvarez, Oscar
    Calvo, Victor
    Luz, Leticia P.
    Artifon, Everson L. A.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2010, 24 (09): : 2092 - 2098
  • [3] RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF SELF-EXPANDING METAL STENTS VERSUS POLYETHYLENE STENTS FOR DISTAL MALIGNANT BILIARY OBSTRUCTION
    DAVIDS, PHP
    GROEN, AK
    RAUWS, EAJ
    TYTGAT, GNJ
    HUIBREGTSE, K
    [J]. LANCET, 1992, 340 (8834-5) : 1488 - 1492
  • [4] A prospective randomised study of "covered'' versus "uncovered'' diamond stents for the management of distal malignant biliary obstruction
    Isayama, H
    Komatsu, Y
    Tsujino, T
    Sasahira, N
    Hirano, K
    Toda, N
    Nakai, Y
    Yamamoto, N
    Tada, M
    Yoshida, H
    Shiratori, Y
    Kawabe, T
    Omata, M
    [J]. GUT, 2004, 53 (05) : 729 - 734
  • [5] Plastic or metal stents for malignant stricture of the common bile duct? Results of a randomized prospective study
    Kaassis, M
    Boyer, J
    Dumas, R
    Ponchon, T
    Coumaros, D
    Delcenserie, R
    Canard, JM
    Fritsch, J
    Rey, JF
    Burtin, P
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2003, 57 (02) : 178 - 182
  • [6] Malignant distal biliary obstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic and surgical bypass results
    Moss, Alan C.
    Morris, Eva
    Leyden, Jan
    MacMathuna, Padraic
    [J]. CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS, 2007, 33 (02) : 213 - 221
  • [7] A comparison of covered and uncovered Wallstents for the management of distal malignant biliary obstruction
    Noon, Won Jae
    Lee, Jun Kyu
    Lee, Kwang Hyuck
    Lee, Woo Jin
    Ryu, Ji Kon
    Kim, Yong-Tae
    Yoon, Yong Bum
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2006, 63 (07) : 996 - 1000
  • [8] A 3-YEAR FOLLOW-UP OF SELF-EXPANDING METAL STENTS IN THE ENDOSCOPIC PALLIATION OF LONG-TERM SURVIVORS WITH MALIGNANT BILIARY OBSTRUCTION
    OBRIEN, S
    HATFIELD, ARW
    CRAIG, PI
    WILLIAMS, SP
    [J]. GUT, 1995, 36 (04) : 618 - 621
  • [9] Covered versus uncovered wallstent for malignant extrahepatic biliary obstruction: A cohort comparative analysis
    Park, Do Hyun
    Kim, Myung-Hwan
    Choi, Jung Sik
    Lee, Sang Soo
    Seo, Dong Wan
    Kim, Ji Hye
    Han, Jimin
    Kim, Jong Cheol
    Choi, Eun Kwang
    Lee, Sung Koo
    [J]. CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2006, 4 (06) : 790 - 796
  • [10] PALLIATION OF PROXIMAL MALIGNANT BILIARY OBSTRUCTION BY ENDOSCOPIC ENDOPROSTHESIS INSERTION
    POLYDOROU, AA
    CAIRNS, SR
    DOWSETT, JF
    HATFIELD, ARW
    SALMON, PR
    COTTON, PB
    RUSSELL, RCG
    [J]. GUT, 1991, 32 (06) : 685 - 689