Cross-sectional observational study exploring clinical risk of titanium allergy caused by dental implants

被引:34
作者
Hosoki, Maki [1 ]
Nishigawa, Keisuke [1 ]
Tajima, Toyoko [1 ]
Ueda, Mayu [1 ]
Matsuka, Yoshizo [1 ]
机构
[1] Tokushima Univ, Grad Sch, Inst Biomed Sci, Dept Stomatognath Funct & Occlusal Reconstruct, 3-18-15 Kuramoto Cho, Tokushima 7708504, Japan
关键词
Metal allergy; Titanium; Dental implants; Patch testing; Epidemiology; PACEMAKER CONTACT SENSITIVITY; SPECTACLE FRAMES; IN-VITRO; NICKEL ALLERGY; DERMATITIS; ALLOYS; HYPERSENSITIVITY; CORROSION; PALLADIUM; EXPOSURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpor.2018.03.003
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: Studies have reported cases of metal allergy caused by titanium-containing materials. We wished to clarify the relationship between titanium allergy and dental implants by describing patients who suffered allergic symptoms after they had received such implants. Methods: A total of 270 patients who visited a Dental Metal Allergy Clinic at Tokushima University Hospital from April 2010 to March 2014 were the study cohort. Patch testing with 28 types of metal allergens (including four titanium allergens) was undertaken for patients. Results: A total of 217 patients (80.4 %) exhibited allergy-positive reactions to at least one type of metal allergen. Mercury, palladium, chromium and nickel exhibited a higher prevalence of allergy-positive reactions than other metals. Sixteen patients visited our clinic suffering allergic symptoms after receiving dental implants. Eleven of those patients exhibited allergy-positive reactions for any of the metal allergens, and 4 of these patients had allergy-positive reactions against titanium allergens. The total number of allergy-positive reactions for titanium allergens among all 270 patients was 17 (6.3 %). No patient exhibited a positive reaction only for the titanium allergen. Conclusions: The prevalence of allergy-positive reactions for titanium allergens was lower than for other metal allergens. We suggest examination of pre-implant patients who have a history of hypersensitivity reactions to metals. (C) 2018 Japan Prosthodontic Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:426 / 431
页数:6
相关论文
共 44 条
[21]  
Inoue M., 1993, J JPN PROSTHODONT SO, V37, P1127, DOI [10.2186/jjps.37.1127, DOI 10.2186/JJPS.37.1127]
[22]  
Jia WY, 1999, J BIOMED MATER RES, V48, P488, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(1999)48:4<488::AID-JBM14>3.3.CO
[23]  
2-4
[24]   Positive patch test reactions to allergens of the dental series and the relation to the clinical presentations [J].
Khamaysi, Ziad ;
Bergman, Reuven ;
Weltfriend, Sara .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2006, 55 (04) :216-218
[25]  
Kim H, 1999, ANGLE ORTHOD, V69, P39
[26]   In vitro assessment of corrosive properties of titanium as a biomaterial [J].
Koike, M ;
Fujii, H .
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2001, 28 (06) :540-548
[27]  
Lachapelle J-M., 2009, Patch Testing and Prick Testing. A Practical Guide
[28]   SENSITIVITY TO TITANIUM - A CAUSE OF IMPLANT FAILURE [J].
LALOR, PA ;
REVELL, PA ;
GRAY, AB ;
WRIGHT, S ;
RAILTON, GT ;
FREEMAN, MAR .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1991, 73 (01) :25-28
[29]   ALLERGY AND CORROSION OF DENTAL MATERIALS IN PATIENTS WITH ORAL LICHEN PLANUS [J].
LUNDSTROM, IMC .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL SURGERY, 1984, 13 (01) :16-24
[30]  
MAGNUSSON B, 1982, SCAND J DENT RES, V90, P163