Estimating Rebates and Other Discounts Received by Medicare Part D

被引:28
作者
Feldman, William B. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Rome, Benjamin N. [1 ,3 ]
Raimond, Veronique C. [1 ,3 ]
Gagne, Joshua J. [1 ,3 ]
Kesselheim, Aaron S. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Med, Program Regulat Therapeut & Law PORTAL, Div Pharmacoepidemiol & Pharmacoecon, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Med, Div Pulm & Crit Care Med, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA 02115 USA
来源
JAMA HEALTH FORUM | 2021年 / 2卷 / 06期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
DRUG PRICES;
D O I
10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.0626
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
This special communication describes the limitations in current methods for estimating rebates and other discounts received by Medicare Part D and proposes a new approach that more fully considers confidential discounts paid by drug manufacturers and pharmacies to Medicare Part D plans. Importance Spending in Medicare Part D continues to increase. Yet, studies of Medicare Part D are plagued by a common limitation: none can fully account for confidential rebates and other discounts that drug manufacturers and pharmacies pay to Medicare Part D plans. Objectives To review existing methods and to propose an approach for estimating rebates and other discounts received by Medicare Part D. Evidence Review Publicly available data from the Boards of Trustees of the Federal Hospital Insurance and Federal Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust Funds, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, the Congressional Budget Office, the Government Accountability Office, and the Office of Inspector General. Findings Existing methods for estimating rebates and other discounts in Medicare Part D have several limitations. This analysis used an approach that aims to improve on those methods. Based on this approach, estimated discounts on brand-name drugs increased in Medicare Part D from 25.4% of gross brand-name spending in 2014 to 37.3% in 2018. There was substantial variation between classes, with estimated 2016 discounts surpassing 50% for some drugs (eg, ophthalmologic and gastrointestinal tract agents) while remaining below 10% for others (eg, antineoplastic and immunologic agents). Between 2014 and 2018, estimated net Medicare Part D spending on prescription drugs increased by 21% from $99 billion to $119 billion. With increasing enrollment, estimated annual net spending per beneficiary remained stable, increasing by just 3% from $2622 to $2694, which was below the 6% rate of inflation during the same period. Conclusions and Relevance Models that fail to properly account for increasing rebates and other discounts will overestimate Medicare Part D expenditures. Rigorous and transparent methods for estimating discounts are critical for understanding patterns in spending and developing new cost-containment strategies.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
Anderson GF, 2019, HLTH AFFAIRS BLOG, DOI [10.1377/hblog20190215.708286/full/, DOI 10.1377/HBLOG20190215.708286/FULL/]
[2]  
Anderson-Cook A, 2020, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V324, P398, DOI 10.1001/jama.2020.7989
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2019, PUBLIC DISCLOSURE DR
[4]   Which Drug Prices Should Medicare Negotiate? A "Too Little" or "Too Late" Approach [J].
Bach, Peter B. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2019, 381 (22) :2084-2086
[5]  
Centers for Medicaid & Medicare Services, 2017, MED D
[6]  
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 2019, REV FIN MED D
[7]  
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, COV DISC PROGR
[8]  
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, MED PROV UT PAYM D D
[9]  
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, COSTS COV GAP
[10]   Association of Prescription Drug Price Rebates inMedicare Part D With Patient Out-of-Pocket and Federal Spending [J].
Dusetzina, Stacie B. ;
Conti, Rena M. ;
Yu, Nancy L. ;
Bach, Peter B. .
JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2017, 177 (08) :1185-1188