The NIH Public Access Policy and Federally Funded Research: An Analysis of Problem Recognition and Agenda Setting

被引:2
作者
McGuigan, Glenn S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ Lib, Penn State Harrisburg Lib, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Information policy; Open access; National Institute of Health; PubMed Central; Public policy; Multiple streams framework;
D O I
10.1016/j.acalib.2014.09.014
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
This interpretive and descriptive study examines the development of the U.S. National Institute of Health's (NIH) public access policy which requires NIH funded research to be made publicly available through an open access depository, the PubMed Central database. Using elements of Kingdon's (2003) multiple streams framework, Stone's (2012) challenges to the theory of free market efficiency, and her rhetorical characterization of "good weak interests" vs. "bad strong interests," this work explores the rationale behind the development of the NIH open access policy. Based upon this rationale and the current structure of the scholarly publishing system, future implications for other federally or publicly funded research are proposed. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:54 / 60
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[11]  
IBISWorld, 2013, 51112 IBISWORLD
[12]  
Kingdon J. W., 1984, AGENDAS ALTERNATIVES
[13]  
Kroth PJ, 2006, J MED LIBR ASSOC, V94, P279
[14]  
Matthews S, 2013, NAT MED, V19, P123
[15]  
McGinn J. M., 2002, BASIC BUSINESS LIB C, P109
[16]  
McGuigan G.S., 2008, E-JASL: The Electronic Journal of Academic and Special Librarianship, V9
[17]  
Merriam S. B., 2015, Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation
[18]   "Publishers Did Not Take the Bait": A Forgotten Precursor to the NIH Public Access Policy [J].
Miller, Jonathan .
COLLEGE & RESEARCH LIBRARIES, 2009, 70 (02) :123-132
[19]  
Peek R. P., 1996, SCHOLARLY PUBL, P11
[20]  
Ptolomey J., 2013, Online Searcher, V37, P31