Heparin-bonded Dacron or polytetrafluoroethylene for femoropopliteal bypass grafting: A multicenter trial

被引:74
作者
Devine, C [1 ]
McCollum, C [1 ]
机构
[1] S Manchester Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, NHS Trust, Manchester M20 8LR, Lancs, England
关键词
D O I
10.1067/mva.2001.113578
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Dacron (polyester fiber) was largely abandoned for femoropopliteal bypass grafts 30 pears ago because saphenous vein achieved better patencies. However, in patients taking aspirin, patency in above-knee femoropopliteal bypass grafts has recently been shown to be equivalent to that with saphenous vein. We compared heparin-bonded Dacron (HBD) and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) in a randomized multicenter trial including below-knee popliteal or tibioperoneal trunk bypass graft where the long saphenous vein was absent or inadequate. Methods: Over 28 months, 209 patients undergoing femoropopliteal bypass grafts (180 above-knee, 29 below-knee) were randomized to HBD (n = 106) or PTFE (n = 103). Each patient was given aspirin (300 mg/d) before surgery, and this continued unless the patient had intolerance to the aspirin. Results: The mean follow-up was 42 months (range, 28-55). Fifteen (7.1%) patients died with patent grafts, and three (1.4%) infected grafts were removed. Patency (measured with Kaplan-Meier survival analysis) at 1, 2, and 3 years for HBD was 70%, 63%, and 55% compared with 56%, 46%, and 42%, respectively, for PTFE (P = .044). A total of 67 secondary interventions were performed on 48 thrombosed grafts; long-term patency was achieved in only three. Risk factors for arterial disease did not significantly influence patency. Amputations have been performed in 23 patients, six after HBD and 17 after PTFE bypass grafts (P = .015). Conclusions: HBD achieved better patency than PTFE, which carried a high risk of subsequent amputation.
引用
收藏
页码:533 / 539
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
AALDERS GJ, 1992, J VASC SURG, V16, P816
[2]  
AALDERS GJ, 1988, J CARDIOVASC SURG, V29, P186
[3]   Prosthetic above-knee femoropopliteal bypass grafting: Results of a multicenter randomized prospective trial [J].
Abbott, WM ;
Green, RM ;
Matsumoto, T ;
Wheeler, JR ;
Miller, N ;
Veith, FJ ;
Suggs, WD ;
Hollier, L ;
Money, S ;
Garrett, HE ;
Moore, WS ;
Dean, RH ;
Cronenwett, JL ;
Carter, S ;
Greenhalgh, RM ;
ODonnell, TF .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1997, 25 (01) :19-28
[4]  
BRANDS LC, 1980, INT S ART REC LOW LI, P21
[5]   3-YEAR EXPERIENCE WITH GLUTARALDEHYDE-STABILIZED UMBILICAL VEIN FOR LIMB SALVAGE [J].
DARDIK, H ;
IBRAHIM, IM ;
JARRAH, M ;
SUSSMAN, BC ;
DARDIK, II .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1980, 67 (04) :229-232
[6]  
EIKHOFF JH, 1983, BRIT J SURG, V70, P85
[7]  
GOLDMAN M, 1983, BRIT J SURG, V70, P735
[8]  
GREEN RM, 1982, SURGERY, V92, P1016
[9]   Does a completely accomplished duplex-based surveillance prevent vein-graft failure? [J].
Ihlberg, L ;
Luther, M ;
Albäck, A ;
Kantonen, I ;
Lepäntalo, M .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1999, 18 (05) :395-400
[10]  
JOHNSON WC, 1992, J VASC SURG, V15, P1057