Interpretive Structural Model of Key Performance Indicators for Sustainable Maintenance Evaluatian in Rubber Industry

被引:14
作者
Amrina, E. [1 ]
Yulianto, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Andalas Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Padang, Indonesia
来源
4TH ASIA PACIFIC CONFERENCE ON MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS AND THE 3RD INTERNATIONAL MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING CONFERENCE | 2018年 / 319卷
关键词
D O I
10.1088/1757-899X/319/1/012055
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Sustainable maintenance is a new challenge for manufacturing companies to realize sustainable development. In this paper, an interpretive structural model is developed to evaluate sustainable maintenance in the rubber industry. The initial key performance indicators (KPIs) is identified and derived from literature and then validated by academic and industry experts. As a result, three factors of economic, social, and environmental dividing into a total of thirteen indicators are proposed as the KPIs for sustainable maintenance evaluation in rubber industry. Interpretive structural modeling (ISM) methodology is applied to develop a network structure model of the KPIs consisting of three levels. The results show the economic factor is regarded as the basic factor, the social factor as the intermediate factor, while the environmental factor indicated to be the leading factor. Two indicators of social factor i.e. labor relationship, and training and education have both high driver and dependence power, thus categorized as the unstable indicators which need further attention. All the indicators of environmental factor and one indicator of social factor are indicated as the most influencing indicator. The interpretive structural model hoped can aid the rubber companies in evaluating sustainable maintenance performance.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Amrina E, 2016, 2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT (IEEM), P350, DOI 10.1109/IEEM.2016.7797895
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1987, Our common future
  • [3] The quest for sustainability: Challenges for process systems engineering
    Bakshi, BR
    Fiksel, J
    [J]. AICHE JOURNAL, 2003, 49 (06) : 1350 - 1358
  • [4] A systematic procedure to evaluate an automobile manufacturer-distributor partnership
    Chen, Shuo-Pei
    Wu, Wann-Yih
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2010, 205 (03) : 687 - 698
  • [5] Chompu-inwai R, 2013, I C SERV SYST SERV M, P844, DOI 10.1109/ICSSSM.2013.6602603
  • [6] Critical review of reductionist approaches for assessing the progress towards sustainability
    Gasparatos, Alexandros
    El-Haram, Mohamed
    Homer, Malcolm
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2008, 28 (4-5) : 286 - 311
  • [7] Advanced Maintenance Services for Promoting Sustainability
    Iung, Benoit
    Levrat, Eric
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE IN THROUGH-LIFE ENGINEERING SERVICES, 2014, 22 : 15 - 22
  • [8] Jasiulewicz-Kaczmarek, 2013, ECOPRODUCTION LOGIST, P117, DOI [10.1007/978-3-642-23553-5_8, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-23553-5_8]
  • [9] A hybrid approach using ISM and fuzzy TOPSIS for the selection of reverse logistics provider
    Kannan, Govindan
    Pokharel, Shaligram
    Kumar, P. Sasi
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2009, 54 (01) : 28 - 36
  • [10] Liyanage J P, 2013, HDB MAINTENANCE MANA, P665