Using unconstrained elite archives for multiobjective optimization

被引:145
作者
Fieldsend, JE [1 ]
Everson, RM [1 ]
Singh, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Exeter, Dept Comp Sci, Exeter EX4 4QF, Devon, England
关键词
evolution strategies; genetic algorithms; multiple objectives; optimization;
D O I
10.1109/TEVC.2003.810733
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) have been the subject of numerous studies over the past 20 years. Recent work has highlighted the use of an active archive of elite, nondominated solutions to improve the optimization speed of these algorithms. However, preserving all elite individuals is costly in time (due to the linear comparison with all archived solutions needed before a new solution can be inserted into the archive). Maintaining an elite population of a fixed maximum size (by clustering or other means) alleviates this problem, but can cause retreating (or oscillitory) and shrinking estimated Pareto fronts-which can affect the efficiency of the search process. New data structures are introduced to facilitate the use of an unconstrained elite archive, without the need for a linear comparison to the elite set for every new individual inserted. The general applicability of these data structures is shown by their use in an evolution-strategy-based MOEA and a genetic-algorithm-based MOEA. It is demonstrated that MOEAs using the new data structures run significantly faster than standard, unconstrained archive MOEAs, and result in estimated Pareto fronts significantly ahead of MOEAs using a constrained archive. It is also shown that the use of an unconstrained elite archive permits robust criteria for algorithm termination to be used, and that the use of the data structure can also be used to increase the speed of algorithms using epsilon-dominance methods.
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 323
页数:19
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1964, Some rapid approximate statistical procedures
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1999, P IEEE C EVOLUTIONAR, DOI DOI 10.1109/CEC.1999.781913
  • [3] BEALE GO, 1978, AIAA J GUIDANCE CONT, V1, P237
  • [4] BENTLEY JL, 1979, COMPUT SURV, V11, P397, DOI 10.1145/356789.356797
  • [5] BENTLEY JL, 1975, COMMUN ACM, P509
  • [6] Coello C, 1999, KNOWL INF SYST, V1, P129, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF03325101
  • [7] De Berg M., 2000, COMPUTATIONAL GEOMET, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-03427-9
  • [8] DEB K, 2002, 2002004 IND I TECHN
  • [9] DEB K, 2001, 2001001 KANGAL KANP
  • [10] Multi-objective Genetic Algorithms: Problem Difficulties and Construction of Test Problems
    Deb, Kalyanmoy
    [J]. EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 1999, 7 (03) : 205 - 230