Communication of BRCA Results and Family Testing in 1,103 High-Risk Women

被引:83
作者
Cheung, Eleanor L. [1 ,4 ]
Olson, Ashley D. [1 ]
Yu, Tina M. [1 ]
Han, Pamela Z. [1 ]
Beattie, Mary S. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Canc Risk Program, San Francisco, CA 94115 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Med, San Francisco, CA 94115 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, San Francisco, CA 94115 USA
[4] Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch, Piscataway, NJ USA
关键词
OVARIAN-CANCER SUSCEPTIBILITY; BREAST-CANCER; HEREDITARY BREAST; RELATIVES; SATISFACTION; KNOWLEDGE; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0325
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Genetic testing for hereditary cancer risk has implications for individuals and families. This study of women at risk of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer examines communication of BRCA results and subsequent genetic testing in the family. Methods: We surveyed 1,103 female BRCA testers at two hospitals, querying for communication of results and testing in relatives. Results: Ninety-seven percent of participants communicated BRCA results with at least one relative. Communication was negatively associated with older age [odds ratio (OR), 0.66 per decade; 95% confidence interval, (95% CI), 0.4-0.9], Asian race (OR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.06-0.5), and testing at the public hospital versus the cancer center (OR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.07-0.5). Communication was positively associated with increased knowledge of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer screening and risk reduction recommendations (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.1-3.4) and increased satisfaction with the decision to BRCA test (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.6-4.0). Seventy-five percent of BRCA-positive participants reported that at least one relative pursued genetic testing. Family testing was negatively associated with Asian race (OR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.02-0.8) and positively associated with increased socioeconomic status (OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1-1.7) and increased satisfaction with decision (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.1-4.1). Conclusion: Despite high overall rates of communicating BRCA results, underserved and some minority women seem less likely to inform relatives of their BRCA status or have relatives test for a known family mutation. Satisfaction with the decision to BRCA test is positively associated with both outcomes. Impact: This study identified several novel predictors of family communication and family genetic testing in a large population of high-risk women. This work can inform clinicians interested in improving family communication regarding cancer predisposition testing. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 19(9); 2211-9. (C) 2010 AACR.
引用
收藏
页码:2211 / 2219
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Early use of clinical BRCA1/2 testing:: Associations with race and breast cancer risk [J].
Armstrong, K ;
Weber, B ;
Stopfer, J ;
Calzone, K ;
Putt, M ;
Coyne, J ;
Schwartz, JS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A, 2003, 117A (02) :154-160
[2]   Toward cultural competence in cancer genetic counseling and genetics education: Lessons learned from Chinese-Australians [J].
Barlow-Stewart, K ;
Yeo, SS ;
Meiser, B ;
Goldstein, D ;
Tucker, K ;
Eisenbruch, M .
GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2006, 8 (01) :24-32
[3]   Breast cancer risk counseling improves women's functioning [J].
Bowen, DJ ;
Burke, W ;
McTiernan, A ;
Yasui, Y ;
Andersen, MR .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2004, 53 (01) :79-86
[4]   Communication with close and distant relatives in the context of genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in cancer patients [J].
Claes, E ;
Evers-Kiebooms, G ;
Boogaerts, A ;
Decruyenaere, M ;
Denayer, L ;
Legius, E .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A, 2003, 116A (01) :11-19
[5]   Communication of BRCA1 and BRCA2 results to at-risk Relatives:: A cancer risk assessment program's experience [J].
Costalas, JW ;
Itzen, M ;
Malick, J ;
Babb, JS ;
Bove, B ;
Godwin, AK ;
Daly, MB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART C-SEMINARS IN MEDICAL GENETICS, 2003, 119C (01) :11-18
[6]   Factors determining dissemination of results and uptake of genetic testing in families with known BRCA1/2 mutations [J].
Finlay, Esme ;
Stopfer, Jill E. ;
Burlingame, Eric ;
Evans, Katherine Goldfeder ;
Nathanson, Katherine L. ;
Weber, Barbara L. ;
Armstrong, Katrina ;
Rebbeck, Timothy R. ;
Domchek, Susan M. .
GENETIC TESTING, 2008, 12 (01) :81-91
[7]   Influence of Race/Ethnicity on Genetic Counseling and Testing for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer [J].
Forman, Andrea D. ;
Hall, Michael J. .
BREAST JOURNAL, 2009, 15 :S56-S62
[8]   Effect of a computer-based decision aid on knowledge, perceptions, and intentions about genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility - A randomized controlled trial [J].
Green, MJ ;
Peterson, SK ;
Baker, MW ;
Harper, GR ;
Friedman, LC ;
Rubinstein, WS ;
Manger, DT .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 292 (04) :442-452
[9]   Disparities in genetic testing:: Thinking outside the BRCA box [J].
Hall, Michael J. ;
Olopade, Olufunmilayo I. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (14) :2197-2203
[10]   Patient satisfaction with health care decisions: The satisfaction with decision scale [J].
HolmesRovner, M ;
Kroll, J ;
Schmitt, N ;
Rovner, DR ;
Breer, ML ;
Rothert, ML ;
Padonu, G ;
Talarczyk, G .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1996, 16 (01) :58-64