Discriminating Quantum States with Quantum Machine Learning

被引:1
|
作者
Quiroga, David [1 ]
Date, Prasanna [2 ]
Pooser, Raphael [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Antioquia, Engn Fac, Medellin, Colombia
[2] Oak Ridge Natl Lab, Comp Sci & Math, Oak Ridge, TN USA
[3] Oak Ridge Natl Lab, Computat Sci & Engn, Oak Ridge, TN USA
关键词
Quantum Computing; Machine Learning; Quantum Machine Learning; K-Means; QK-Means; Crosstalk;
D O I
10.1109/ICRC53822.2021.00018
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Quantum machine learning (QML) algorithms have obtained great relevance in the machine learning (ML) field due to the promise of quantum speedups when performing basic linear algebra subroutines (BLAS), a fundamental element in most ML algorithms. By making use of BLAS operations, we propose, implement and analyze a quantum k-means (qk-means) algorithm with a low time complexity of O(NKlog(D)I/C) to apply it to the fundamental problem of discriminating quantum states at readout. Discriminating quantum states allows the identification of quantum states vertical bar 0 > and vertical bar 1 > from low-level in-phase and quadrature signal (IQ) data, and can be done using custom ML models. In order to reduce dependency on a classical computer, we use the qk-means to perform state discrimination on the IBMQ Bogota device and managed to find assignment fidelities of up to 98.7% that were only marginally lower than that of the k-means algorithm. We also performed a cross-talk benchmark on the quantum device by applying both algorithms to perform state discrimination on a combination of quantum states and using Pearson Correlation coefficients and assignment fidelities of discrimination results to conclude on the presence of cross-talk on qubits. Evidence shows cross-talk in the (1, 2) and (2, 3) neighboring qubit couples for the analyzed device.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 63
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Discriminating Quantum States with Quantum Machine Learning
    Quiroga, David
    Date, Prasanna
    Pooser, Raphael
    2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON QUANTUM COMPUTING AND ENGINEERING (QCE 2021) / QUANTUM WEEK 2021, 2021, : 481 - 482
  • [2] Machine Learning for Discriminating Quantum Measurement Trajectories and Improving Readout
    Magesan, Easwar
    Gambetta, Jay M.
    Corcoles, A. D.
    Chow, Jerry M.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2015, 114 (20)
  • [3] Experimental Machine Learning of Quantum States
    Gao, Jun
    Qiao, Lu-Feng
    Jiao, Zhi-Qiang
    Ma, Yue-Chi
    Hu, Cheng-Qiu
    Ren, Ruo-Jing
    Yang, Ai-Lin
    Tang, Hao
    Yung, Man-Hong
    Jin, Xian-Min
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2018, 120 (24)
  • [4] Quantum Machine Learning Tensor Network States
    Kardashin, Andrey
    Uvarov, Alexey
    Biamonte, Jacob
    FRONTIERS IN PHYSICS, 2021, 8
  • [5] Discriminating states:: The quantum Chernoff bound
    Audenaert, K. M. R.
    Calsamiglia, J.
    Munoz-Tapia, R.
    Bagan, E.
    Masanes, Ll.
    Acin, A.
    Verstraete, F.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2007, 98 (16)
  • [6] Machine-Learning Quantum States in the NISQ Era
    Torlai, Giacomo
    Melko, Roger G.
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF CONDENSED MATTER PHYSICS, VOL 11, 2020, 2020, 11 (11): : 325 - 344
  • [7] DISCRIMINATING QUANTUM STATES: THE MULTIPLE CHERNOFF DISTANCE
    Li, Ke
    ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 2016, 44 (04): : 1661 - 1679
  • [8] Quantum machine learning
    Lu S.-C.
    Zheng Y.
    Wang X.-T.
    Wu R.-B.
    Wu, Re-Bing (rbwu@tsinghua.edu.cn), 2017, South China University of Technology (34): : 1429 - 1436
  • [9] Quantum machine learning
    Jonathan Allcock
    Shengyu Zhang
    NationalScienceReview, 2019, 6 (01) : 26 - 28
  • [10] Quantum machine learning
    Allcock, Jonathan
    Zhang, Shengyu
    NATIONAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2019, 6 (01) : 26 - +