Discriminating Quantum States with Quantum Machine Learning

被引:1
|
作者
Quiroga, David [1 ]
Date, Prasanna [2 ]
Pooser, Raphael [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Antioquia, Engn Fac, Medellin, Colombia
[2] Oak Ridge Natl Lab, Comp Sci & Math, Oak Ridge, TN USA
[3] Oak Ridge Natl Lab, Computat Sci & Engn, Oak Ridge, TN USA
来源
2021 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON REBOOTING COMPUTING (ICRC 2021) | 2021年
关键词
Quantum Computing; Machine Learning; Quantum Machine Learning; K-Means; QK-Means; Crosstalk;
D O I
10.1109/ICRC53822.2021.00018
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Quantum machine learning (QML) algorithms have obtained great relevance in the machine learning (ML) field due to the promise of quantum speedups when performing basic linear algebra subroutines (BLAS), a fundamental element in most ML algorithms. By making use of BLAS operations, we propose, implement and analyze a quantum k-means (qk-means) algorithm with a low time complexity of O(NKlog(D)I/C) to apply it to the fundamental problem of discriminating quantum states at readout. Discriminating quantum states allows the identification of quantum states vertical bar 0 > and vertical bar 1 > from low-level in-phase and quadrature signal (IQ) data, and can be done using custom ML models. In order to reduce dependency on a classical computer, we use the qk-means to perform state discrimination on the IBMQ Bogota device and managed to find assignment fidelities of up to 98.7% that were only marginally lower than that of the k-means algorithm. We also performed a cross-talk benchmark on the quantum device by applying both algorithms to perform state discrimination on a combination of quantum states and using Pearson Correlation coefficients and assignment fidelities of discrimination results to conclude on the presence of cross-talk on qubits. Evidence shows cross-talk in the (1, 2) and (2, 3) neighboring qubit couples for the analyzed device.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 63
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Discriminating Quantum States with Quantum Machine Learning
    Quiroga, David
    Date, Prasanna
    Pooser, Raphael
    2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON QUANTUM COMPUTING AND ENGINEERING (QCE 2021) / QUANTUM WEEK 2021, 2021, : 481 - 482
  • [2] Quantum Embedding Search for Quantum Machine Learning
    Nguyen, Nam
    Chen, Kwang-Cheng
    IEEE ACCESS, 2022, 10 : 41444 - 41456
  • [3] Quantum Machine Learning Tensor Network States
    Kardashin, Andrey
    Uvarov, Alexey
    Biamonte, Jacob
    FRONTIERS IN PHYSICS, 2021, 8
  • [4] Survey on Quantum Machine Learning
    Wang, Jian
    Zhang, Rui
    Jiang, Nan
    Ruan Jian Xue Bao/Journal of Software, 2024, 35 (08): : 3843 - 3877
  • [5] An introduction to quantum machine learning
    Schuld, Maria
    Sinayskiy, Ilya
    Petruccione, Francesco
    CONTEMPORARY PHYSICS, 2015, 56 (02) : 172 - 185
  • [6] Quantum model learning agent: characterisation of quantum systems through machine learning
    Flynn, Brian
    Gentile, Antonio A.
    Wiebe, Nathan
    Santagati, Raffaele
    Laing, Anthony
    NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2022, 24 (05):
  • [7] Machine Learning: Quantum vs Classical
    Khan, Tariq M.
    Robles-Kelly, Antonio
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 219275 - 219294
  • [8] An introduction to quantum machine learning: from quantum logic to quantum deep learning
    Leonardo Alchieri
    Davide Badalotti
    Pietro Bonardi
    Simone Bianco
    Quantum Machine Intelligence, 2021, 3
  • [9] An introduction to quantum machine learning: from quantum logic to quantum deep learning
    Alchieri, Leonardo
    Badalotti, Davide
    Bonardi, Pietro
    Bianco, Simone
    QUANTUM MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2021, 3 (02)
  • [10] Teaching Quantum Machine Learning in Computer Science
    De Luca, Gennaro
    Chen, Yinong
    2023 IEEE 15TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON AUTONOMOUS DECENTRALIZED SYSTEM, ISADS, 2023, : 189 - 195