Clinical significance of basal-like subtype in triple-negative breast cancer

被引:61
作者
Yamamoto, Yutaka [1 ]
Ibusuki, Mutsuko [1 ]
Nakano, Masahiro [1 ]
Kawasoe, Teru [1 ]
Hiki, Ryousuke [2 ]
Iwase, Hirotaka [1 ]
机构
[1] Kumamoto Univ, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Breast & Endocrine Surg, Fac Med & Pharmaceut Sci, Kumamoto 8608556, Japan
[2] Hiki Hosp, Dept Surg, Kumamoto 8620913, Japan
关键词
Basal-like subtype; CK5/6; EGFR; Triple-negative breast cancer; HYPOXIA-INDUCIBLE FACTOR-1-ALPHA; C-KIT; MOLECULAR SUBTYPES; EXPRESSION; MARKERS; PHENOTYPE; HER-2/NEU; PROGNOSIS; ONCOGENE; AMERICAN;
D O I
10.1007/s12282-009-0150-8
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background No clinically useful target molecule has been identified for triple-negative (TN) breast cancer, i.e., estrogen receptor (ER)-negative, progesterone receptor (PgR)-negative, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-negative phenotype, and its prognosis is poor. Triple-negative cancer consists of two subtypes: basal-like and non-basal-like. The aim of this study is to clarify the clinical and biological characteristics of these two subtypes of TN cancer. Methods We examined, by immunohistochemistry, expression of biological markers cytokeratin (CK) 5/6 and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in triple-negative breast cancer. Basal-like subtype was defined as CK5/6-positive and/or EGFR-positive, and non-basal-like subtype was defined as no expression of these two markers. We studied the correlation between basal-like subtype and several factors related to tumor progression, along with the prognostic value of basal-like subtype and other biological markers in triple-negative cancer. Results In the 48 cases of operable triple-negative breast cancer, basal-like subtype was detected in 22 (45.8%) and non-basal-like subtype in 26 (54.2%). Basal-like subtype was significantly correlated with nodal status (P = 0.0475) and nuclear grade (P = 0.0475). Basal-like subtype was also significantly associated with Ki67 labeling index (P = 0.0118), c-kit expression (P = 0.0335), and aurora A expression (P = 0.0020). No association was detected between basal-like cancer and other biological markers. Patients with basal-like subtype of triple-negative cancer showed shorter disease-free survival (P = 0.0049) and overall survival (P = 0.0283) than patients with non-basal-like subtype. No independent prognostic factors were identified among the prognostic factors obtained from univariate analysis. Conclusions These findings suggest that basal markers can be used to classify triple-negative breast cancer into at least two subtypes with differing prognoses. It is necessary to develop a novel treatment strategy to improve the prognosis of patients with basal-like subtype of triple-negative breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:260 / 267
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Descriptive analysis of estrogen receptor (ER)negative, progesterone receptor (PR)-negative, and HER2-negative invasive breast cancer, the so-called triple-negative phenotype - A population-based study from the California Cancer Registry
    Bauer, Katrina R.
    Brown, Monica
    Cress, Rosemary D.
    Parise, Carol A.
    Caggiano, Vincent
    [J]. CANCER, 2007, 109 (09) : 1721 - 1728
  • [2] Does triple-negative phenotype accurately identify basal-like turnour?: An immunohistochemical analysis based on 143 'triple-negative' breast cancers
    Bidard, F.-C.
    Conforti, R.
    Boulet, T.
    Michiels, S.
    Delaloge, S.
    Andre, F.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2007, 18 (07) : 1285 - 1286
  • [3] A homologue of Drosophila aurora kinase is oncogenic and amplified in human colorectal cancers
    Bischoff, JR
    Anderson, L
    Zhu, YF
    Mossie, K
    Ng, L
    Souza, B
    Schryver, B
    Flanagan, P
    Clairvoyant, F
    Ginther, C
    Chan, CSM
    Novotny, M
    Slamon, DJ
    Plowman, GD
    [J]. EMBO JOURNAL, 1998, 17 (11) : 3052 - 3065
  • [4] Levels of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α independently predict prognosis in patients with lymph node negative breast carcinoma
    Bos, R
    van der Groep, P
    Greijer, AE
    Shvarts, A
    Meijer, S
    Pinedo, HM
    Semenza, GL
    van Diest, PJ
    van der Wall, E
    [J]. CANCER, 2003, 97 (06) : 1573 - 1581
  • [5] The triple negative paradox: Primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes
    Carey, Lisa A.
    Dees, E. Claire
    Sawyer, Lynda
    Gatti, Lisa
    Moore, Dominic T.
    Collichio, Frances
    Ollila, David W.
    Sartor, Carolyn I.
    Graham, Mark L.
    Perou, Charles M.
    [J]. CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2007, 13 (08) : 2329 - 2334
  • [6] Basal-like breast cancer defined by five biomarkers has superior prognostic value then triple-negative phenotype
    Cheang, Maggie C. U.
    Voduc, David
    Bajdik, Chris
    Leung, Samuel
    McKinney, Steven
    Chia, Stephen K.
    Perou, Charles M.
    Nielsen, Torsten O.
    [J]. CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2008, 14 (05) : 1368 - 1376
  • [7] Immunohistochemical expression of the c-kit proto-oncogene product in human malignant and non-malignant breast tissues
    Chui, X
    Egami, H
    Yamashita, J
    Kurizaki, T
    Ohmachi, H
    Yamamoto, S
    Ogawa, M
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1996, 73 (10) : 1233 - 1236
  • [8] Triple-negative breast cancer: therapeutic options
    Cleator, Susan
    Heller, Wolfgang
    Coombes, R. Charles
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2007, 8 (03) : 235 - 244
  • [9] Triple-negative breast cancer: Clinical features and patterns of recurrence
    Dent, Rebecca
    Trudeau, Maureen
    Pritchard, Kathleen I.
    Hanna, Wedad M.
    Kahn, Harriet K.
    Sawka, Carol A.
    Lickley, Lavina A.
    Rawlinson, Ellen
    Sun, Ping
    Narod, Steven A.
    [J]. CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2007, 13 (15) : 4429 - 4434
  • [10] Aurora kinases as anticancer drug targets
    Gautschi, Oliver
    Heighway, Jim
    Mack, Philip C.
    Purnell, Phillip R.
    Lara, Primo N., Jr.
    Gandara, David R.
    [J]. CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2008, 14 (06) : 1639 - 1648