Study of Bone-screw Surface Fixation in Lumbar Dynamic Stabilization

被引:6
作者
Luo, Yun-Gang [1 ]
Yu, Tao [2 ]
Liu, Guo-Min [2 ]
Yang, Nan [3 ]
机构
[1] Jilin Univ, Hosp 2, Dept Stomatol, Changchun 130041, Jilin, Peoples R China
[2] Jilin Univ, Hosp 2, Dept Orthoped, Changchun 130041, Jilin, Peoples R China
[3] Tradit Chinese Med Acad Sci Jilin Prov, Changchun 130041, Jilin, Peoples R China
关键词
Bone-screw Interface; Dynamic Fixation; Histomorphology; Mechanical Stability; Micro-computed Tomography; LOW-BACK-PAIN; BIOMECHANICAL EVALUATION; SPINE; INSTRUMENTATION; SYSTEM; RISK;
D O I
10.4103/0366-6999.150107
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: We aimed to use the animal model of dynamic fixation to examine the interaction of the pedicle screw surface with surrounding bone, and determine whether pedicle screws achieve good mechanical stability in the vertebrae. Methods: Twenty-four goats aged 2-3 years had Cosmic (R) pedicle screws implanted into both sides of the L2-L5 pedicles. Twelve goats in the bilateral dynamic fixation group had fixation rods implanted in L2-L3 and L4-L5. Twelve goats in the unilateral dynamic fixation group had fixation rods randomly fixed on one side of the lumbar spine. The side that was not implanted with fixation rods was used as a static control group. Results: In the static control group, new bone was formed around the pedicle screw and on the screw surface. In the unilateral and bilateral dynamic fixation groups, large amounts of connective tissue formed between and around the screw threads, with no new bone formation on the screw surface; the pedicle screws were loose after the fixed rods were removed. The bone mineral density and morphological parameters of the region of interest (ROI) in the unilateral and bilateral dynamic fixation group were not significantly different (P > 0.05), but were lower in the fixed groups than the static control group (P < 0.05). This showed the description bone of the ROI in the static control group was greater than in the fixation groups. Under loading conditions, the pedicle screw maximum pull force was not significantly different between the bilateral and unilateral dynamic fixation groups (P > 0.05); however the maximum pull force of the fixation groups was significantly less than the static control group (P < 0.01). Conclusions: Fibrous connective tissue formed at the bone-screw interface under unilateral and bilateral pedicle dynamic fixation, and the pedicle screws lost mechanical stability in the vertebrae.
引用
收藏
页码:368 / 372
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Comparison of the load-sharing characteristics between pedicle-based dynamic and rigid rod devices
    Ahn, Yoon-Ho
    Chen, Wen-Ming
    Lee, Kwon-Yong
    Park, Kyung-Woo
    Lee, Sung-Jae
    [J]. BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS, 2008, 3 (04)
  • [2] Epidemiological features of chronic low-back pain
    Andersson, GBJ
    [J]. LANCET, 1999, 354 (9178) : 581 - 585
  • [3] Adjacent Segment Mobility After Rigid and Semirigid Instrumentation of the Lumbar Spine
    Cakir, Balkan
    Carazzo, Charles
    Schmidt, Rene
    Mattes, Thomas
    Mattes, Thomas
    Reichel, Heiko
    Kaefer, Wolfram
    [J]. SPINE, 2009, 34 (12) : 1287 - 1291
  • [4] Titanium-alloy enhances bone-pedicle screw fixation:: mechanical and histomorphometrical results of titanium-alloy versus stainless steel
    Christensen, FB
    Dalstra, M
    Sejling, F
    Overgaard, S
    Bünger, C
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2000, 9 (02) : 97 - 103
  • [5] Cunningham Bryan W, 2004, Spine J, V4, p219S, DOI 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.07.015
  • [6] Higher risk of adjacent segment degeneration after floating fusions: Long-term outcome after low lumbar spine fusions
    Disch, Alexander Carl
    Schmoelz, Werner
    Matziolis, Georg
    Schneider, Sascha V.
    Knop, Christian
    Putzier, Michael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2008, 21 (02): : 79 - 85
  • [7] Complications in lumbar fusion surgery for chronic low back pain:: comparison of three surgical techniques used in a prospective randomized study.: A report from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group
    Fritzell, P
    Hägg, O
    Nordwall, A
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2003, 12 (02) : 178 - 189
  • [8] Biomechanical evaluation of posterior lumbar dynamic stabilization: an in vitro comparison between Universal Clamp and Wallis systems
    Ilharreborde, Brice
    Shaw, Miranda N.
    Berglund, Lawrence J.
    Zhao, Kristin D.
    Gay, Ralph E.
    An, Kai-Nan
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2011, 20 (02) : 289 - 296
  • [9] Comparison of the biomechanical effect of pedicle-based dynamic stabilization: a study using finite element analysis
    Jahng, Tae-Ahn
    Kim, Young Eun
    Moon, Kyung Yun
    [J]. SPINE JOURNAL, 2013, 13 (01) : 85 - 94
  • [10] Dynamic simulation of universal spacer in Dynesys dynamic stabilization system for human vertebra
    Kim, Sung-Min
    Yang, In-Chul
    Lee, Seung-Yeol
    Cho, Sung-Youn
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF NONFERROUS METALS SOCIETY OF CHINA, 2009, 19 : S238 - S242