Whose results are these anyway? Reciprocity and the ethics of "giving back" after social network research

被引:20
作者
Tubaro, Paola [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris Sud, CNRS, Lab Rech Informat, Bat 660, F-91405 Orsay, France
关键词
Research ethics; Reporting results to study participants; Reciprocity; Communication outside academia; Social network research; Network visualization; METHODOLOGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.socnet.2019.10.003
中图分类号
Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
030303 ;
摘要
Bridging the social networks, field methods and ethics literatures, I make the case that the process of reporting research findings is an ethical issue, and recommend elevating it in the research design. I draw on a reflective account of three research experiences with settings in, respectively, online health communities, economic or-ganizations, and the mainstream media. I proceed in steps, discussing release of personal network results to individual participants, of whole network results to the researched community, and finally of general results to wider audiences, under a unifying idea that a reciprocity obligation underlies the reporting process. I claim that communication should follow an iterative rather than a linear approach to reach all relevant stakeholders, thereby mitigating the vulnerabilities that arise from research.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 73
页数:9
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
Baxter P, 2008, QUAL REP, V13, P544
[2]  
Becker H.S., 1978, REFLECTIONS COMMUNIT, P267
[3]   Qualitative Methods and Visualizations in the Study of Friendship Networks [J].
Bellotti, Elisa .
SOCIOLOGICAL RESEARCH ONLINE, 2016, 21 (02)
[4]  
Borgatti S., 2003, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, V39, P337, DOI [DOI 10.1177/0021886303258111, 10.1177 /0021886303258111]
[5]   Toward ethical guidelines for network research in organizations [J].
Borgatti, SP ;
Molina, J .
SOCIAL NETWORKS, 2005, 27 (02) :107-117
[6]  
BOURDIEU Pierre., 1984, QUESTIONS SOCIOLOGIE
[7]   2004 American Sociological Association Presidential Address: For public sociology [J].
Burawoy, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 2005, 56 (02) :259-294
[8]  
Burawoy Michael., 2005, Critical Sociology, V31, P313
[9]  
Cahill C, 2007, ROUTL STUD HUM GEOGR, V22, P196
[10]  
Chardel P.A., 2012, C COMPR PHEN PROAN C