Initial Experience With Identifying High-Grade Prostate Cancer Using Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging (DWI) in Patients With a Gleason Score ≤3+3=6 Upon Schematic TRUS-Guided Biopsy A Radical Prostatectomy Correlated Series

被引:70
作者
Somford, Diederik M. [1 ,2 ]
Hambrock, Thomas [3 ]
Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, Christina A. [4 ]
Futterer, Jurgen J. [3 ]
van Oort, Inge M. [2 ]
van Basten, Jean-Paul [1 ]
Karthaus, Herbert F. [1 ]
Witjes, J. Alfred [2 ]
Barentsz, Jelle O. [3 ]
机构
[1] Canisius Wilhelmina Hosp Nijmegen CWZ, Dept Urol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Urol, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
magnetic resonance imaging; apparent diffusion coefficient; prostatic neoplasms; Gleason; biopsy; COEFFICIENT VALUES; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; NEEDLE-BIOPSY; INSIGNIFICANT; TUMOR; TISSUE; AGGRESSIVENESS; TRANSITION; OUTCOMES; ZONES;
D O I
10.1097/RLI.0b013e31823ea1f0
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Introduction: Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (DWI) might be able to fulfill the need to accurately identify high-grade prostate carcinoma, in patients initially selected for active surveillance in the Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) screening era based on transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy Gleason score. We aimed to determine whether DWI is able to correctly identify those patients with a biopsy Gleason score of <3 + 3 = 6, but harboring Gleason 4 and/or 5 components in their radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen. Materials and Methods: Whole-mount RP specimens were used to identify regions of interest corresponding with tumor on the DWI-derived apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps in 23 patients with a Gleason <= 3 + 3 = 6 on biopsy. ADC values were correlated with RP Gleason grades. Statistical analysis was performed by calculating area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for identification of prostate cancer with Gleason 4 and/or 5 components using DWI, and Mann-Whitney U testing was performed to detect differences in median ADC values for tumors with presence of Gleason grade 4 and/or 5 versus a highest Gleason grade of <= 3 on RP. Results: A diagnostic accuracy of median ADC values for identifying patients subject to transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy undergrading with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.88 was established using RP Gleason score as a reference. In patients harboring a Gleason 4 and/or 5 component, the median ADC was 0.86 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s (standard deviation +/- 0.21), whereas patients harboring no Gleason 4 and/or 5 component displayed a median ADC of 1.16 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s (standard deviation +/- 0.19) for the single tumor slice with the lowest median ADC (P < 0.002). Conclusions: DWI is able to predict the presence of high-grade tumor in patients with a Gleason <= 3 + 3 = 6 on biopsy, providing important information for treatment decisions.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 158
页数:6
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   European Association of Urology Position Statement on Screening for Prostate Cancer [J].
Abrahamsson, Per-Anders ;
Artibani, Walter ;
Chapple, Christopher R. ;
Wirth, Manfred .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2009, 56 (02) :270-271
[2]  
Amin M.B., 2004, GLEASON GRADING PROS
[3]   Relating biopsy and clinical variables to radical prostatectomy findings: Can insignificant and advanced prostate cancer be predicted in a screening population? [J].
Anast, JW ;
Andriole, GL ;
Bismar, TA ;
Yan, Y ;
Humphrey, PA .
UROLOGY, 2004, 64 (03) :544-550
[4]   Insignificant prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimen: Time trends and preoperative prediction [J].
Augustin, H ;
Hammerer, PG ;
Graefen, M ;
Erbersdobler, A ;
Blonski, J ;
Palisaar, J ;
Daghofer, F ;
Huland, H .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2003, 43 (05) :455-460
[5]   Insignificant Prostate Cancer and Active Surveillance: From Definition to Clinical Implications [J].
Bastian, Patrick J. ;
Carter, Ballentine H. ;
Bjartell, Anders ;
Seitz, Michael ;
Stanislaus, Peter ;
Montorsi, Francesco ;
Stief, Christian G. ;
Schroeder, Fritz .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2009, 55 (06) :1321-1332
[6]   Prostate cancer: Trends in incidence, survival and mortality in the Netherlands, 1989-2006 [J].
Cremers, R. G. H. M. ;
Karim-Kos, H. E. ;
Houterman, S. ;
Verhoeven, R. H. A. ;
Schroder, F. H. ;
van der Kwast, T. H. ;
Kil, P. J. M. ;
Coebergh, J. W. W. ;
Kiemeney, L. A. L. M. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2010, 46 (11) :2077-2087
[7]   Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: a potential non-invasive marker of tumour aggressiveness in localized prostate cancer [J].
deSouza, N. M. ;
Riches, S. F. ;
VanAs, N. J. ;
Morgan, V. A. ;
Ashley, S. A. ;
Fisher, C. ;
Payne, G. S. ;
Parker, C. .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2008, 63 (07) :774-782
[8]   Radical Prostatectomy Findings in Patients in Whom Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer Fails [J].
Duffield, Amy S. ;
Lee, Thomas K. ;
Miyamoto, Hiroshi ;
Carter, H. Ballantine ;
Epstein, Jonathan I. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 182 (05) :2274-2278
[9]   A contemporary study correlating prostate needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy gleason score [J].
Fine, Samson W. ;
Epstein, Jonathan I. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (04) :1335-1338
[10]   PSA in the new millennium: A powerful predictor of prostate cancer prognosis and radical prostatectomy outcomes - Results from the SEARCH database [J].
Freedland, Stephen J. ;
Hotaling, James M. ;
Fitzsimons, Nicholas J. ;
Presti, Joseph C., Jr. ;
Kane, Christopher J. ;
Terris, Martha K. ;
Aronson, William J. ;
Amling, Christopher L. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2008, 53 (04) :758-766