Patient safety during anaesthesia: incorporation of the WHO safe surgery guidelines into clinical practice

被引:21
作者
Schlack, Wolfgang S. [1 ]
Boermeester, Marja A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Anaesthesiol, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Surg, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
patient safety; perioperative complications; perioperative mortality; review; surgical checklist; time out; SURGICAL-PATIENTS; ADVERSE EVENTS; OPERATING-ROOM; COMMUNICATION; CHECKLIST; SYSTEM; ACCOUNTABILITY; IMPLEMENTATION; FAILURES; PROTOCOL;
D O I
10.1097/ACO.0b013e3283400b26
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Purpose of review WHO makes clear recommendations on how to improve patient safety during surgical procedures by using the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist. We will review the scientific basis of these recommendations and the practical problems encountered during introduction. Recent findings Perioperative severe complications and death are a major health issue in both developed and developing countries. Nearly half of these complications can be avoided. The systematic use of checklists and structured preprocedural and postprocedural briefings like a time-out procedure reduces perioperative morbidity and mortality. A broader use of checklists to cover the whole surgical pathway gives additional benefit, further reducing perioperative morbidity and mortality. Introducing patient safety procedures can be met with some resistance from healthcare workers and is helped by an organization-wide safety policy and a systematic approach. Summary There is sufficient scientific evidence to make the use of checklists and structured perioperative briefings and debriefings mandatory for the broad spectrum of operative procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:754 / 758
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] *COMM QUAL HEALTHC, 2000, ERR IS HUM BUILD SAF
  • [2] Development and validation of the SURgical PAtient Safety System (SURPASS) checklist
    de Vries, E. N.
    Hollmann, M. W.
    Smorenburg, S. M.
    Gouma, D. J.
    Boermeester, M. A.
    [J]. QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2009, 18 (02): : 121 - 126
  • [3] DEVRIES EN, N ENGL J ME IN PRESS
  • [4] *DUTCH SOC AN, 2010, DUTCH CBO GUID PREOP
  • [5] Verifying patient identity and site of surgery: improving compliance with protocol by audit and feedback
    Garnerin, P.
    Ares, M.
    Huchet, A.
    Clergue, F.
    [J]. QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2008, 17 (06): : 454 - 458
  • [6] The incidence and nature of surgical adverse events in Colorado and Utah in 1992
    Gawande, AA
    Thomas, EJ
    Zinner, MJ
    Brennan, TA
    [J]. SURGERY, 1999, 126 (01) : 66 - 75
  • [8] Patterns of communication breakdowns resulting in injury to surgical patients
    Greenberg, Caprice C.
    Regenbogen, Scott E.
    Studdert, David M.
    Lipsitz, Stuart R.
    Rogers, Selwyn O.
    Zinner, Michael J.
    Gawande, Atul A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2007, 204 (04) : 533 - 540
  • [9] The American College of Surgeons' closed claims study: New insights for improving care
    Griffen, F. Dean
    Stephens, Linda S.
    Alexander, James B.
    Bailey, H. Randolph
    Maizel, Scott E.
    Sutton, Beth Howell
    Posner, Karen L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2007, 204 (04) : 561 - 569
  • [10] Systematic review of randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of virtual reality training for laparoscopic surgery
    Gurusamy, K.
    Aggarwal, R.
    Palanivelu, L.
    Davidson, B. R.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2008, 95 (09) : 1088 - 1097