A review of evidence-based practice, nursing research and reflection: levelling the hierarchy

被引:77
作者
Mantzoukas, Stefanos [1 ]
机构
[1] Thames Valley Univ, Inst Hlth & Human Sci, London, England
关键词
evidence-based practice; hierarchy; nurses; nursing; reflection;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01912.x
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Aim. This paper examines the evidence-based practice movement, the hierarchy of evidence and the relationship between evidence-based practice and reflective practice. Background. Evidence-based practice is equated with effective decision making, with avoidance of habitual practice and with enhanced clinical performance. The hierarchy of evidence has promoted randomized control trials as the most valid source of evidence. However, this is problematic for practitioners as randomized control trials overlook certain types of knowledge that, through the process of reflection, provide useful information for individualized and effective practice. Method. A literature search was undertaken using CINAHL, medline and Ovid electronic databases in early 2006. The search terms used were: evidence-based practice, research evidence, evidence for practice, qualitative research, reflective practice, reflection and evidence. Other sources included handpicking of books on evidence-based practice, reflection and research. Only material written in English was included. Findings. The hierarchy of evidence that has promoted randomized control trials as the most valid form of evidence may actually impede the use of most effective treatment because of practical, political/ideological and epistemological contradictions and limitations. Furthermore, evidence-based practice appears to share very similar definitions, aims and procedures with reflective practice. Hence, it appears that the evidence-based practice movement may benefit much more from the use of reflection on practice, rather than the use of the hierarchical structure of evidence. Conclusion. Evidence-based practice is necessary for nursing, but its' effective implementation may be hindered by the hierarchy of evidence. Furthermore, evidence-based practice and reflection are both processes that share very similar aims and procedures. Therefore, to enable the implementation of best evidence in practice, the hierarchy of evidence might need to be abandoned and reflection to become a core component of the evidence-based practice movement. Relevance to clinical practice. Provides an elaborated analysis for clinical nurses on the definition and implementation of evidence in practice.
引用
收藏
页码:214 / 223
页数:10
相关论文
共 82 条
[41]   Family therapy and the politics of evidence [J].
Larner, G .
JOURNAL OF FAMILY THERAPY, 2004, 26 (01) :17-39
[42]   A qualitative examination of primary care providers' and physician managers' uses and views of research evidence [J].
Lorenz, K ;
Ryan, G ;
Morton, SC ;
Chan, KS ;
Wang, S ;
Shekelle, PG .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2005, 17 (05) :409-414
[43]  
MacPhee Maura, 2005, J Pediatr Nurs, V20, P396, DOI 10.1016/j.pedn.2005.03.015
[44]   Evidence-based psychiatry: understanding the limitations of a method [J].
Maier, T .
JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2006, 12 (03) :325-329
[45]   Reflexivity and metapositions: strategies for appraisal of clinical evidence [J].
Malterud, K .
JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2002, 8 (02) :121-126
[46]   Issues of representation within qualitative inquiry [J].
Mantzoukas, S .
QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2004, 14 (07) :994-1007
[47]  
MANTZOUKAS S, 2002, THESIS U PORTSMOUTH
[48]   The inclusion of bias in reflective and reflexive research A necessary prerequisite for securing validity [J].
Mantzoukas, Stefanos .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN NURSING, 2005, 10 (03) :279-295
[49]   Barriers to evidence based practice in primary care: a review of the literature [J].
McKenna, H ;
Ashton, S ;
Keeney, S .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2004, 41 (04) :369-378
[50]  
McKenna H, 2000, Nurs Stand, V14, P39