DEFORMABLE MAPPING METHOD TO RELATE LESIONS IN DEDICATED BREAST CT IMAGES TO THOSE IN AUTOMATED BREAST ULTRASOUND AND DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS IMAGES

被引:3
|
作者
Green, Crystal A. [1 ,2 ]
Goodsitt, Mitchell M. [1 ,2 ]
Lau, Jasmine H. [2 ]
Brock, Kristy K. [3 ]
Davis, Cynthia L. [4 ]
Carson, Paul L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Nucl Engn & Radiol Sci, 2355 Bonisteel Blvd, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan Hlth Syst, Dept Radiol, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Imaging Phys, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Gen Elect Global Res, Niskayuna, NY USA
来源
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2020年 / 46卷 / 03期
关键词
Breast imaging; Multi-modality; Deformable registration; External markers; Biomechanical modeling; Breast CT; Digital breast tomosynthesis; Automated breast ultrasound; HYPERELASTIC PROPERTIES; X-RAY; REGISTRATION; MAMMOGRAPHY; CANCER; DENSE; COMPRESSION; MRI; VOLUME; TISSUE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2019.10.016
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
This work demonstrates the potential for using a deformable mapping method to register lesions between dedicated breast computed tomography (bCT) and both automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) images (craniocaudal [CC] and mediolateral oblique [MLO] views). Two multi-modality breast phantoms with external fiducial markers attached were imaged by the three modalities. The DBT MLO view was excluded for the second phantom. The automated deformable mapping algorithm uses biomechanical modeling to determine corresponding lesions based on distances between their centers of mass (d(COM)) in the deformed bCT model and the reference model (DBT or ABUS). For bCT to ABUS, the mean d(COM) was 5.2 +/- 2.6 mm. For bCT to DBT (CC), the mean d(COM) was 5.1 +/- 2.4 mm. For bCT to DBT (MLO), the mean d(COM) was 4.7 +/- 2.5 mm. This application could help improve a radiologist's efficiency and accuracy in breast lesion characterization, using multiple imaging modalities. (C) 2019 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:750 / 765
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] PRELIMINARY CLINICAL EXPERIENCE WITH A COMBINED AUTOMATED BREAST ULTRASOUND AND DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS SYSTEM
    Larson, Eric D.
    Lee, Won-Mean
    Roubidoux, Marilyn A.
    Goodsitt, Mitchell M.
    Lashbrook, Chris
    Davis, Cynthia E.
    Kripfgans, Oliver D.
    Carson, Paul L.
    ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2018, 44 (03): : 734 - 742
  • [22] Texture analysis of lesions in breast ultrasound images
    Sivaramakrishna, R
    Powell, KA
    Lieber, ML
    Chilcote, WA
    Shekhar, R
    COMPUTERIZED MEDICAL IMAGING AND GRAPHICS, 2002, 26 (05) : 303 - 307
  • [23] Quantitative analysis of breast echotexture patterns in automated breast ultrasound images
    Chang, Ruey-Feng
    Hou, Yu-Ling
    Lo, Chung-Ming
    Huang, Chiun-Sheng
    Chen, Jeon-Hor
    Kim, Won Hwa
    Chang, Jung Min
    Bae, Min Sun
    Moon, Woo Kyung
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (08) : 4566 - 4578
  • [24] Value of digital breast tomosynthesis in characterization of breast lesions in dense breast
    Romeih, Marwa
    Raafat, Tarek Ahmed
    Ahmed, Gehad
    Shalaby, Shymaa Abd El-Mawla
    Ahmed, Wafaa Ali Heidar
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2024, 55 (01):
  • [25] Conspicuity of suspicious breast lesions on contrast enhanced breast CT compared to digital breast tomosynthesis and mammography
    Aminololama-Shakeri, Shadi
    Abbey, Craig K.
    Lopez, Javier E.
    Hernandez, Andrew M.
    Gazi, Peymon
    Boone, John M.
    Lindfors, Karen K.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 92 (1097):
  • [26] Effect of Denoising on the Quality of Reconstructed Images in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    Vieira, Marcelo A. C.
    Bakic, Predrag R.
    Maidment, Andrew D. A.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2013: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2013, 8668
  • [27] Characterization of breast masses: a comparative study between automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT)
    Hashem, Lamiaa Mohamed Bassam
    Ali, Reham Hussein Mohamed
    Helal, Maha Hussein
    Gemeae, Emad ELdin E. L.
    Moustafa, Amr Farouk Ibrahim
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2020, 51 (01):
  • [28] Breast cancer staging: Combined digital breast tomosynthesis and automated breast ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging
    Girometti, Rossano
    Tomkova, Ludmila
    Cereser, Lorenzo
    Zuiani, Chiara
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 107 : 188 - 195
  • [29] Two-View Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening with Synthetically Reconstructed Projection Images: Comparison with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis with Full-Field Digital Mammographic Images
    Skaane, Per
    Bandos, Andriy I.
    Eben, Ellen B.
    Jebsen, Ingvild N.
    Krager, Mona
    Haakenaasen, Unni
    Ekseth, Ulrika
    Izadi, Mina
    Hofvind, Solveig
    Gullien, Randi
    RADIOLOGY, 2014, 271 (03) : 655 - 663
  • [30] Characterization of breast masses: a comparative study between automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT)
    Lamiaa Mohamed Bassam Hashem
    Reham Hussein Mohamed Ali
    Maha Hussein Helal
    Emad ELdin E. L. Gemeae
    Amr Farouk Ibrahim Moustafa
    Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 51