DecisionMaster: A multi-criteria decision support system with ability to combine different decision rules

被引:2
作者
Podvesovskii, Aleksandr [1 ]
Zakharova, Alena [2 ]
Korostelyov, Dmitriy [1 ]
Kuzin, Aleksandr [1 ]
机构
[1] Bryansk State Tech Univ, 7,50 Let Oktyabrya Blvd, Bryansk 241035, Russia
[2] Russian Acad Sci, Inst Control Sci, 65 Profsoyuznaya St, Moscow 117997, Russia
基金
俄罗斯基础研究基金会;
关键词
Decision support system; Ranking of alternatives; Multi-criteria decision making methods; SELECTION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.softx.2021.100814
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The article describes the DecisionMaster decision support system. The importance of the decisionmaking problem is noted, as well as the need for the development and use of software tools for decision support. The structure and architecture of the DecisionMaster system, the main stages of the wizard for describing and solving the problem of ranking alternatives are described: setting information about the criteria, forming a list of alternatives, as well as choosing and configuring supported decision-making methods (SMART, WASPAS, Taxonomy, REGIME, PROMETHEE, and ELECTRE). The ability to generalize the decision-making problem for the simultaneous use of different decision-making methods is a distinctive feature of the developed system. An example of using the developed system for the task of determining the performer responsible for the construction of a new dam is given. The possibility of using the developed system for research purposes, in commercial projects, as well as in the educational process is noted. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Alinezhad A., 2019, New Methods and Applications in Multiple Attribute Decision Making (MADM). International Series in Operations Research Management Science, V1st
  • [2] Averchenkov VI, 2014, COMM COM INF SC, V466, P410
  • [3] Human risk assessment of Panchet Dam in India using TOPSIS and WASPAS Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) methods
    Bid, Sumanta
    Siddique, Giyasuddin
    [J]. HELIYON, 2019, 5 (06)
  • [4] Bihl T, 2014, ENCY BUSINESS ANALYT, P696, DOI 10.4018/978-1-4666-5202-6.ch065
  • [5] Brans J.P., 2016, PROMETHEE Methods, P187, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-3094-4_6
  • [6] Chakraborty R., 2013, International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, V4, P491, DOI 10.5267/j.ijiec.2013.06.006
  • [7] A COMPREHENSIVE SOLUTION TO AUTOMATED INSPECTION DEVICE SELECTION PROBLEMS USING ELECTRE METHODS
    Chatterjee, Prasenjit
    Mondal, Suprakash
    Chakraborty, Shankar
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 5 (02) : 193 - 208
  • [8] ELECTRE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications
    Govindan, Kannan
    Jepsen, Martin Brandt
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2016, 250 (01) : 1 - 29
  • [9] ERP Selection: The SMART Way
    Haddara, Moutaz
    [J]. CENTERIS 2014 - CONFERENCE ON ENTERPRISE INFORMATION SYSTEMS / PROJMAN 2014 - INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PROJECT MANAGEMENT / HCIST 2014 - INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES, 2014, 16 : 394 - 403
  • [10] Collaborative Decision Making: Complementary Developments of a Model and an Architecture as a Tool Support
    Jankovic, Marija
    Zarate, Pascale
    Bocquet, Jean-Claude
    Le Cardinal, Julie
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 1 (01) : 35 - 45