Laparoscopic Live Donor Nephrectomy: Comparison of Outcomes Right Versus Left

被引:15
作者
Kumar, A. [1 ]
Chaturvedi, S. [1 ]
Gulia, A. [1 ]
Maheshwari, R. [1 ]
Dassi, V. [1 ]
Desai, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Max Super Special Hosp Saket, Dept Urol Robot & Renal Transplantat, New Delhi, India
关键词
KIDNEY-TRANSPLANTATION; RENAL-TRANSPLANTATION; METAANALYSIS; DONATION; VEIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.03.034
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Objective. To compare outcomes between right- and left-sided laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy (LDN). Left LDN (LLDN) remains the side of choice whenever possible because the left renal vein is longer; however, there are some donors in whom the right kidney is taken for donation due to anatomical or functional reasons. Right LDN (RLDN) is perceived to be difficult due to anatomical factors. Therefore, many surgeons have a bias for left kidney donation or will do right side donation as an open donor nephrectomy. At our institution, we routinely perform RLDN when indicated and herein compare the outcomes between right- and left-sided LDN. Methods. From January 2007 to January 2017, 1850 laparoscopic donor nephrectomies were conducted at the Max Super Speciality Hospital. Of these, 168 were right-sided donor nephrectomies and 1682 were left-sided donor nephrectomies. All the donor case records were retrospectively reviewed; the operative time, warm ischemia time, intraoperative events, blood loss, and postoperative parameters were recorded. The kidney recipient data were also recorded. Results. The donor demographic characteristics were comparable between 2 groups. Among other variables, operating time was significantly less in RLDN (120 minutes) versus the LLDN group (146 minutes). Intraoperative estimated blood loss (118 mL in RLDN; 126 mL in LLDN), warm ischemia time (4.8 minutes in RLDN; 5.2 minutes in LLDN) and hospital stay (4.2 days in RLDN; 4.3 days in LLDN) was comparable. Vascular complications occurred in four patients in the RLDN group and six cases in the LLDN group. Recipient outcomes were comparable. Conclusions. With adequate experience, RLDN can be accomplished in a safe manner with comparable outcomes to LLDN.
引用
收藏
页码:2327 / 2332
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Long-Term Donor Outcomes after Pure Laparoscopic versus Open Living Donor Nephrectomy: Focus on Pregnancy Rates, Hypertension and Quality of Life
    Friedersdorff, Frank
    Kothmann, Lisa
    Manus, Philipp
    Roigas, Jan
    Kempkensteffen, Carsten
    Magheli, Ahmed
    Busch, Jonas
    Liefeldt, Lutz
    Giessing, Markus
    Deger, Serdar
    Schostak, Martin
    Miller, Kurt
    Fuller, Tom Florian
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2016, 97 (04) : 450 - 456
  • [42] Safety and Efficacy of Right Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Live Donor Nephrectomy: A Retrospective Single-Center Study
    Fu, Yaowen
    Hu, Yu
    Wang, Weigang
    Gao, Baoshan
    Wang, Gang
    Lian, Xin
    Zhou, Honglan
    Wang, Yuantao
    ANNALS OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2020, 25
  • [43] Transition from laparoscopic to retroperitoneoscopic approach for live donor nephrectomy
    Ng, Zi Qin
    Musk, Gabrielle
    Rea, Alethea
    He, Bulang
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 32 (06): : 2793 - 2799
  • [44] Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Live Donor Nephrectomy: Report of 105 Cases
    Dong, Jun
    Lu, Jinshan
    Zu, Qiang
    Yang, Suxia
    Guo, Gang
    Ma, Xin
    Li, Hongzhao
    Zhang, Xu
    JOURNAL OF HUAZHONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2011, 31 (01) : 100 - 102
  • [45] Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy:: surgical technique and results.
    Lefi, Mounir
    Game, Xavier
    Cointault, Olivier
    Mouzin, Marc
    Kamar, Nassim
    Vaessen, Christophe
    Malavaud, Bernard
    Sarramon, Jean-Pierre
    Durand, Dominique
    Rischmann, Pascal
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2006, 16 (03): : 336 - 342
  • [46] Mini-Laparoscopic Live Donor Nephrectomy: Initial Series
    Simforoosh, Nasser
    Soltani, Mohammad Hossein
    Sharifi, Seyed Hossein Hosseini
    Ahanian, Ali
    Lashay, Alireza
    Arab, Davood
    Zare, Samad
    UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2013, 10 (04) : 1054 - 1058
  • [47] Laparoscopic and open live donor nephrectomy: a cost/benefit study
    Berney, T
    Malaise, J
    Mourad, M
    Morel, P
    Squifflet, JP
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2000, 13 (01) : 35 - 40
  • [48] Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Live Donor Nephrectomy:Report of 105 Cases
    董隽
    卢锦山
    祖强
    杨素霞
    郭刚
    马鑫
    李宏召
    张旭
    Current Medical Science, 2011, 31 (01) : 100 - 102
  • [49] Hand-assisted laparoscopic and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: A comparison of surgical outcomes from two centres
    Sevinc, Cuneyd
    Ozkaptan, Orkunt
    Balaban, Muhsin
    Karadeniz, Tahir
    As, Abdullah
    Cicek, Nuran Sevimli Kuslu
    Sariyar, Muzaffar
    Sahin, Selcuk
    Tugcu, Volkan
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 44 (04): : 362 - 366
  • [50] Comparison of outcomes of hand-assisted laparoscopic to open donor nephrectomy for pediatric recipients
    Baron, Pedro W.
    Brooks, Jaysson
    Baldwin, D. Duane
    Cutler, Drew
    Kore, Arputharaj
    Elihu, Arvand
    de Vera, Michael
    Sahney, Shobha
    PEDIATRIC TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 17 (04) : 374 - 379