Postnatal consequences of assisted reproductive technologies in cattle

被引:6
作者
Hansen, Peter J. [1 ,2 ]
Siqueira, Luiz Gustavo B. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Anim Sci, DH Barron Reprod & Perinatal Biol Res Program, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Genet Inst, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[3] Embrapa Gado Leite, Juiz De Fora, MG, Brazil
关键词
dairy cattle; in vitro fertilization; milk yield; sexed semen; VITRO EMBRYO PRODUCTION; LACTATING DAIRY-COWS; SEX-SORTED SEMEN; IN-VITRO; ARTIFICIAL-INSEMINATION; LONG-TERM; PREIMPLANTATION PERIOD; INSULIN-RESISTANCE; PREGNANCY RATES; MOUSE EMBRYOS;
D O I
10.21451/1984-3143-AR991
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Experiments in mice and clinical observations in humans are indicative that adult phenotype can be altered in offspring derived from embryos that were subjected to culture or that were produced by the combination of in vitro oocyte maturation, fertilization and embryonic development (in vitro production; IVP). The most commonly observed changes are in body and organ size, growth rate, cardiovascular function and regulation of glucose homeostasis. In cattle, IVP is associated with increased birth weight and neonatal death loss but little is known about the long-term consequences of embryo technologies. Recently, postnatal characteristics were compared between females born as a result of artificial insemination, IVP using conventional semen, IVP using reverse X-sorted semen, and multiple ovulation - embryo transfer. Females born following IVP using reverse X-sorted semen produced less milk, milk fat, and milk protein than females in the other three groups, which were similar to each other. These results point out the importance of 1) examining other data sets to examine long-term impact of assisted reproductive technologies on adult physiology and performance and 2) evaluating whether use of sexed semen alters the adult phenotype when used for artificial insemination.
引用
收藏
页码:490 / 496
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Assisted reproductive technologies in the reproductive management of small ruminants
    Amiridis, G. S.
    Cseh, S.
    ANIMAL REPRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2012, 130 (3-4) : 152 - 161
  • [32] Reproductive technologies and genomic selection in dairy cattle
    Ponsart, C.
    Le Bourhis, D.
    Knijn, H.
    Fritz, S.
    Guyader-Joly, C.
    Otter, T.
    Lacaze, S.
    Charreaux, F.
    Schibler, L.
    Dupassieux, D.
    Mullaart, E.
    REPRODUCTION FERTILITY AND DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 26 (01) : 12 - 21
  • [33] Recent advances in assisted reproductive technologies
    Khamsi, F
    Lacanna, I
    Endman, M
    Wong, J
    ENDOCRINE, 1998, 9 (01) : 15 - 25
  • [34] Recent advances in assisted reproductive technologies
    Firouz Khamsi
    Iara Lacanna
    Maxine Endman
    Jeremy Wong
    Endocrine, 1998, 9 : 15 - 25
  • [35] Analgesia and anesthesia for assisted reproductive technologies
    Vlahos, Nikos F.
    Giannakikou, Iosifina
    Vlachos, Athanasios
    Vitoratos, Nikolaos
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2009, 105 (03) : 201 - 205
  • [36] Genetic Counseling and Assisted Reproductive Technologies
    Lilienthal, Debra
    Cahr, Michelle
    COLD SPRING HARBOR PERSPECTIVES IN MEDICINE, 2020, 10 (11): : 1 - 14
  • [37] Epigenetic changes and assisted reproductive technologies
    Mani, Sneha
    Ghosh, Jayashri
    Coutifaris, Christos
    Sapienza, Carmen
    Mainigi, Monica
    EPIGENETICS, 2020, 15 (1-2) : 12 - 25
  • [38] Assisted reproductive technologies for male subfertility
    Cissen, Maartje
    Bensdorp, Alexandra
    Cohlen, Ben J.
    Repping, Sjoerd
    de Bruin, Jan Peter
    van Wely, Madelon
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2016, (02):
  • [39] The Future of Cryopreservation in Assisted Reproductive Technologies
    Bosch, Ernesto
    De Vos, Michel
    Humaidan, Peter
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2020, 11
  • [40] Female Obesity and Assisted Reproductive Technologies
    Kumbak, Banu
    Oral, Engin
    Bukulmez, Orhan
    SEMINARS IN REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2012, 30 (06) : 507 - 516