Approximate dynamic programming approach for process control

被引:47
作者
Lee, Jay H. [1 ]
Wong, Weechin [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Chem & Biomol Engn, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
关键词
Stochastic process control; Stochastic dynamic programming; Approximate dynamic programming; Dual control; Constrained control; DESIGN; ISSUES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jprocont.2010.06.007
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
We assess the potentials of the approximate dynamic programming (ADP) approach for process control, especially as a method to complement the model predictive control (MPC) approach. In the artificial intelligence (AI) and operations research (OR) research communities, ADP has recently seen significant activities as an effective method for solving Markov decision processes (MDPs), which represent a type of multi-stage decision problems under uncertainty. Process control problems are similar to MDPs with the key difference being the continuous state and action spaces as opposed to discrete ones. In addition, unlike in other popular ADP application areas like robotics or games, in process control applications first and foremost concern should be on the safety and economics of the on-going operation rather than on efficient learning. We explore different options within ADP design, such as the pre-decision state vs. post-decision state value function, parametric vs. nonparametric value function approximator, batch-mode vs. continuous-mode learning, and exploration vs. robustness. We argue that ADP possesses great potentials, especially for obtaining effective control policies for stochastic constrained nonlinear or linear systems and continually improving them towards optimality. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1038 / 1048
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Dynamic assignment of a multi-skilled workforce in job shops: An approximate dynamic programming approach [J].
Annear, Luis Mauricio ;
Akhavan-Tabatabaei, Raha ;
Schmid, Verena .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2023, 306 (03) :1109-1125
[22]   An approximate dynamic programming approach for sequential pig marketing decisions at herd level [J].
Pourmoayed, Reza ;
Nielsen, Lars Relund .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2019, 276 (03) :1056-1070
[23]   Stochastic Transactive Control for Electric Vehicle Aggregators Coordination: A Decentralized Approximate Dynamic Programming Approach [J].
Pan, Zhenning ;
Yu, Tao ;
Li, Jie ;
Qu, Kaiping ;
Chen, Lvpeng ;
Yang, Bo ;
Guo, Wenxin .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID, 2020, 11 (05) :4261-4277
[24]   An approximate dynamic programming approach to convex quadratic knapsack problems [J].
Hua, ZS ;
Zhang, B ;
Liang, L .
COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2006, 33 (03) :660-673
[25]   An Approximate Dynamic Programming Approach to Repeated Games with Vector Losses [J].
Kamble, Vijay ;
Loiseau, Patrick ;
Walrand, Jean .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2024, 72 (01) :373-388
[26]   An Approximate Dynamic Programming Approach to Vehicle Platooning Coordination in Networks [J].
Xiong, Xi ;
Wang, Maonan ;
Sun, Dengfeng ;
Jin, Li .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2024, 25 (11) :16536-16547
[27]   Markov Decision Process-Based Resilience Enhancement for Distribution Systems: An Approximate Dynamic Programming Approach [J].
Wang, Chong ;
Ju, Ping ;
Lei, Shunbo ;
Wang, Zhaoyu ;
Wu, Feng ;
Hou, Yunhe .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID, 2020, 11 (03) :2498-2510
[28]   Approximate dynamic programming for missile defense interceptor fire control [J].
Davis, Michael T. ;
Robbins, Matthew J. ;
Lunday, Brian J. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2017, 259 (03) :873-886
[29]   Adaptive railway traffic control using approximate dynamic programming [J].
Ghasempour, Taha ;
Heydecker, Benjamin .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2020, 113 :91-107
[30]   Target tracking control algorithm based on approximate dynamic programming [J].
Li H. ;
Yi W. ;
Cheng X. .
Beijing Hangkong Hangtian Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2019, 45 (03) :597-605