Corporate social responsibility, firm value, and influential institutional ownership

被引:326
|
作者
Buchanan, Bonnie [1 ,3 ]
Cao, Cathy Xuying [1 ]
Chen, Chongyang [2 ]
机构
[1] Seattle Univ, Albers Sch Business & Econ, Dept Finance, 901 12th Ave,POB 222000, Seattle, WA 98122 USA
[2] Pacific Lutheran Univ, Sch Business, Dept Finance, Parkland, WA 98447 USA
[3] HAnken Sch Econ Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
关键词
Corporate social responsibility; ESG; Firm value; Corporate governance; Financial crisis; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; GOVERNANCE; IMPACT; INVESTORS; INVESTMENT; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2018.07.004
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We examine how Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), jointly with influential institutional ownership (IO), affects firm value around the 2008 global financial crisis. We find that the effect of CSR on firm value varies with the level of influential institutional ownership and depends upon economic conditions. Using difference-in-difference methods, we show that compared with non-CSR firms, CSR firms have higher firm values before the financial crisis but experience more loss in firm value during the crisis. Our findings suggest that the overall CSR effect depends on the relative dominance of two effects: conflict-resolution and overinvestment effect. In addition, we apply triple difference analysis and show that the relation between CSR and firm value depends upon the level of influential institutional ownership. Specifically, before the crisis, CSR positively affects the value of low institutional ownership firms and the effect is significantly weaker for firms with higher influential IO. During the crisis, the CSR-firm value relation is positive for high institutional ownership firms, suggesting that overinvestment concerns dominate when the crisis occurs. However, such a positive IO effect is not significant for CSR firms with high rollover risks. Our results are supported by a series of robustness tests.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 95
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Relationships Between Corporate Social Responsibility, Firm Value, and Institutional Ownership: Evidence from Indonesia
    Hermeindito, Hermeindito
    JOURNAL OF ASIAN FINANCE ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, 2022, 9 (05): : 365 - 376
  • [2] Institutional ownership horizon, corporate social responsibility and shareholder value
    Erhemjamts, Otgontsetseg
    Huang, Kershen
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2019, 105 : 61 - 79
  • [3] Corporate Social Responsibility, Product Strategy, and Firm Value
    Cho, Eunho
    Tsang, Albert
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2020, 49 (02) : 272 - 298
  • [4] Institutional blockholders and corporate social responsibility
    Chung, Chune Young
    Cho, Sang Jun
    Ryu, Doojin
    Ryu, Doowon
    ASIAN BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT, 2019, 18 (03) : 143 - 186
  • [5] Ultimate ownership, corporate social responsibility and firm value: evidence from China
    Su, Kun
    Fu, Senliulu
    Meng, Yuan
    Wan, Rui
    CHINESE MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2025,
  • [6] Does institutional framework shape the corporate social responsibility?
    Orazayeva, Assem
    Arslan, Muhammad
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT, 2025, 16 (02) : 225 - 244
  • [7] Corporate Social Responsibility as Economic Mechanism for Creating Firm Value
    Ronald, Sam
    Ng, Suwandi
    Daromes, Fransiskus Eduardus
    INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABILITY ACCOUNTING AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 3 (01) : 22 - 36
  • [8] Corporate misconduct and corporate social responsibility: the roles of CEO incentives and institutional ownership
    Thosuwanchot, Nongnapat
    Lee, Min Suk
    SOCIETY AND BUSINESS REVIEW, 2025, 20 (01) : 176 - 200
  • [9] Corporate social responsibility and firm value: the role of enterprise risk management and corporate governance
    Farooq, Muhammad
    Khan, Imran
    Kainat, Mariam
    Mumtaz, Adeel
    CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS IN SOCIETY, 2025, 25 (03): : 631 - 663
  • [10] Does Ownership Type Matter for Corporate Social Responsibility?
    Dam, Lammertjan
    Scholtens, Bert
    CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW, 2012, 20 (03) : 233 - 252