MIB-1 as a predictor of response in lung allografts with moderate acute cellular rejection

被引:4
|
作者
Fasano, M
Yousem, S
Jagirdar, J
机构
[1] NYU, Dept Pathol, New York, NY 10016 USA
[2] NYU, Kaplan Comprehens Canc Ctr, New York, NY 10016 USA
[3] Bellevue Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Pathol, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
MIB-1; lung transplant; acute rejection; response; therapy;
D O I
10.1097/00000478-199806000-00013
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
The major obstacle that long-term lung transplant recipients face is bronchiolitis obliterans. Prior episodes of acute rejection, specifically their frequency, persistence, and severity, are important predictors of bronchiolitis obliterans. Many cells contribute to the damage of acute rejection, and there is no sole cell type that can predict persistent rejection or bronchiolitis obliterans. In this study we evaluated 48 transbronchial biopsy samples from Various grades of acute rejection with the proliferation marker MIB-1 and attempted to retrospectively predict response to standard corticosteroid in a subpopulation of nine responders and nine nonresponders, all with grade A3 rejection. We then characterized the proliferating cells by double labeling with MIB-1 and L26, CD3, OPD4, or KP1. Our results indicate that the proliferating cells in acute lung rejection are a heterogeneous pool of T-and B-lymphocytes, T-helper cells, macrophages, endothelial cells, and possibly parenchymal cells, and that MIB-1 is a valuable tool in the evaluation of total cellular activity in this setting. In addition, the overall proliferation rate, defined as the most intense proliferation rate regardless of location in the biopsy, closely matches the grade of acute rejection. Finally, a low lesional proliferation rate, defined as the proliferation rate at the site of perivascular inflammation diagnostic of acute rejection, is an indicator of excellent response to therapy and may have potential clinical importance.
引用
收藏
页码:749 / 754
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] MIB-1 as a predictor of responder status in lung transplant patients.
    Fasano, M
    Yousem, S
    Jagirdar, J
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 1996, 74 (01) : 903 - 903
  • [2] MIB-1 and schwannomas - Response
    Comey, CH
    McLaughlin, MR
    Martinez, AJ
    Jho, HD
    Lunsford, LD
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1999, 90 (04) : 810 - 810
  • [3] Simpson Grade and MIB-1 Response
    Oya, Soichi
    Saito, Nobuhito
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2012, 117 (01) : 119 - 120
  • [4] MIB-1: a predictor of survival in patients with ovarian carcinoma
    Geisler, JP
    Geisler, HE
    Wiemann, MC
    Zhou, Z
    Miller, GA
    Crabtree, W
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 1998, 8 (05) : 392 - 396
  • [5] Is MIB-1 proliferation index a predictor for response to neoadjuvant therapy in patients with esophageal cancer?
    Imdahl, A
    Jenkner, J
    Ihling, C
    Rückauer, KD
    Farthmann, EH
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2000, 179 (06): : 514 - 520
  • [6] MIB-1 expression is a strong prognostic predictor in prostate cancer
    Lopez, J. I.
    Ferruelo, A.
    Rodriguez-Barbero, J. M.
    Santana, A.
    Bilbao, F. J.
    Angulo, J. C.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2007, 87 : 157A - 157A
  • [7] Prognostic value of MIB-1 in neuroendocrine tumours of the lung
    Bohm, J
    Koch, S
    Gais, P
    Jutting, U
    Prauer, HW
    Hofler, H
    JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 1996, 178 (04): : 402 - 409
  • [8] Eosinophils in acute cellular rejection in liver allografts
    Nagral, A
    Ben-Ari, Z
    Dhillon, AP
    Burroughs, AK
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION AND SURGERY, 1998, 4 (05): : 355 - 362
  • [9] THE IMMUNOLOGICAL RESPONSE TO ALLOGRAFTS - ACUTE REJECTION
    MILLER, J
    ESQUENAZI, V
    FULLER, L
    ZUCKER, K
    ROTH, D
    FERNANDEZ, J
    BURKE, G
    NERY, J
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 1991, 5 (06) : 477 - 488
  • [10] The MIB-1/caspase labeling index as a predictor of metastasis to the brain in patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma
    Saad, A. G.
    Thunnissen, F. B.
    Pinkus, G. S.
    Pinkus, J. L.
    Chirieac, L. R.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2007, 87 : 330A - 330A