A guide to Bayesian model selection for ecologists

被引:621
作者
Hooten, M. B. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Hobbs, N. T. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, US Geol Survey, Colorado Cooperat Fish & Wildlife Res Unit, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[2] Colorado State Univ, Dept Fish Wildlife & Conservat Biol, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[3] Colorado State Univ, Dept Stat, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[4] Colorado State Univ, Grad Degree Program Ecol, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[5] Colorado State Univ, Dept Ecosyst Sci & Sustainabil, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[6] Colorado State Univ, Nat Resource Ecol Lab, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Akaike information criterion; Bayes factors; cross-validation; deviance information criterion; model averaging; multi-model inference; regularization; shrinkage; ESTIMATING SITE OCCUPANCY; PREDICTIVE MODEL; VARIABLE SELECTION; INFORMATION; INFERENCE; CHOICE; REGRESSION; UNCERTAINTY;
D O I
10.1890/14-0661.1
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The steady upward trend in the use of model selection and Bayesian methods in ecological research has made it clear that both approaches to inference are important for modern analysis of models and data. However, in teaching Bayesian methods and in working with our research colleagues, we have noticed a general dissatisfaction with the available literature on Bayesian model selection and multimodel inference. Students and researchers new to Bayesian methods quickly find that the published advice on model selection is often preferential in its treatment of options for analysis, frequently advocating one particular method above others. The recent appearance of many articles and textbooks on Bayesian modeling has provided welcome background on relevant approaches to model selection in the Bayesian framework, but most of these are either very narrowly focused in scope or inaccessible to ecologists. Moreover, the methodological details of Bayesian model selection approaches are spread thinly throughout the literature, appearing in journals from many different fields. Our aim with this guide is to condense the large body of literature on Bayesian approaches to model selection and multimodel inference and present it specifically for quantitative ecologists as neutrally as possible. We also bring to light a few important and fundamental concepts relating directly to model selection that seem to have gone unnoticed in the ecological literature. Throughout, we provide only a minimal discussion of philosophy, preferring instead to examine the breadth of approaches as well as their practical advantages and disadvantages. This guide serves as a reference for ecologists using Bayesian methods, so that they can better understand their options and can make an informed choice that is best aligned with their goals for inference.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 28
页数:26
相关论文
共 89 条
[31]   Models for inference in dynamic metacommunity systems [J].
Dorazio, Robert M. ;
Kery, Marc ;
Royle, J. Andrew ;
Plattner, Matthias .
ECOLOGY, 2010, 91 (08) :2466-2475
[32]   A predictive model of avian natal dispersal distance provides prior information for investigating response to landscape change [J].
Garrard, Georgia E. ;
McCarthy, Michael A. ;
Vesk, Peter A. ;
Radford, James Q. ;
Bennett, Andrew F. .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 2012, 81 (01) :14-23
[33]   Model choice: A minimum posterior predictive loss approach [J].
Gelfand, AE ;
Ghosh, SK .
BIOMETRIKA, 1998, 85 (01) :1-11
[34]   SAMPLING-BASED APPROACHES TO CALCULATING MARGINAL DENSITIES [J].
GELFAND, AE ;
SMITH, AFM .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1990, 85 (410) :398-409
[35]  
Gelman A., 2014, Understanding predictive information criteria for Bayesian models
[36]   Philosophy and the practice of Bayesian statistics [J].
Gelman, Andrew ;
Shalizi, Cosma Rohilla .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL & STATISTICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 66 (01) :8-38
[37]   Rao-Blackwellization for Bayesian Variable Selection and Model Averaging in Linear and Binary Regression: A Novel Data Augmentation Approach [J].
Ghosh, Joyee ;
Clyde, Merlise A. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2011, 106 (495) :1041-1052
[38]   Strictly proper scoring rules, prediction, and estimation [J].
Gneiting, Tilmann ;
Raftery, Adrian E. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2007, 102 (477) :359-378
[39]   Making and Evaluating Point Forecasts [J].
Gneiting, Tilmann .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2011, 106 (494) :746-762
[40]   On the relationship between Markov chain Monte Carlo methods for model uncertainty [J].
Godsill, SJ .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND GRAPHICAL STATISTICS, 2001, 10 (02) :230-248