Exploiting Ultra-Wideband Channel Impulse Responses for Device-Free Localization

被引:7
作者
Cimdins, Marco [1 ]
Schmidt, Sven Ole [1 ]
Bartmann, Peter [1 ]
Hellbruck, Horst [1 ]
机构
[1] TH Lubeck, Dept Elect Engn & Comp Sci, Monkhofer Weg 239, D-23562 Lubeck, Germany
关键词
device-free localization; channel impulse response; ultra-wideband; radio tomographic imaging; multi-static radar; multipath components; multipath-assisted; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.3390/s22166255
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
In radio-frequency (RF)-based device-free localization (DFL), the number of sensors acting as RF transmitters and receivers is crucial for accuracy and system costs. Two promising approaches for DFL have been identified in the past: radio tomographic imaging (RTI) and multi-static radar (MSR). RTI in its basic version requires many sensors for high accuracy, which increases the cost. In this paper, we show how RTI benefits from multipath propagation. By evaluating the direct and echo paths, we increase the coverage of the target area, and by utilizing UWB signals, the RTI system is less susceptible to multipath propagation. MSR maps reflections that occur within the target area to reflectors such as persons or other objects. MSR does not require that the person is located near a signal path. Both suggested methods exploit ultra-wideband (UWB) channel impulse response (CIR) measurements. CIR measurements and the modeling of multipath effects either increase the accuracy or reduce the required number of sensors for localization with RTI. We created a test setup and measure UWB CIRs at different positions with a commercially available off-the-shelf UWB radio chip, the Decawave DW1000. We compare the localization results of RTI, multipath-assisted (MA)-RTI, and MSR and investigate a combined approach. We show that RTI is improved by the analysis of multipath propagation; furthermore, MA-RTI results in a better performance compared to MSR: with 50% of all cases, the localization error is better than 0.82 m and in 80% of all cases 1.34 m. The combined approach results in the best localization result with 0.64 m in 50% of all cases.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Bartoletti S., 2012, 2012 Tyrrhenian Workshop on Advances in Radar and Remote Sensing (TyWRRS 2012), P140, DOI 10.1109/TyWRRS.2012.6381119
  • [2] Sensor Radar Networks for Indoor Tracking
    Bartoletti, Stefania
    Conti, Andrea
    Giorgetti, Andrea
    Win, Moe Z.
    [J]. IEEE WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS LETTERS, 2014, 3 (02) : 157 - 160
  • [3] Passive Unsupervised Localization and Tracking using a Multi-Static UWB Radar Network
    Bocus, Mohammud J.
    Piechocki, Robert J.
    [J]. 2021 IEEE GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE (GLOBECOM), 2021,
  • [4] UWB and WiFi Systems as Passive Opportunistic Activity Sensing Radars
    Bocus, Mohammud J.
    Chetty, Kevin
    Piechocki, Robert J.
    [J]. 2021 IEEE RADAR CONFERENCE (RADARCONF21): RADAR ON THE MOVE, 2021,
  • [5] FitLoc: Fine-Grained and Low-Cost Device-Free Localization for Multiple Targets Over Various Areas
    Chang, Liqiong
    Chen, Xiaojiang
    Wang, Yu
    Fang, Dingyi
    Wang, Ju
    Xing, Tianzhang
    Tang, Zhanyong
    [J]. IEEE-ACM TRANSACTIONS ON NETWORKING, 2017, 25 (04) : 1994 - 2007
  • [6] Target Detection Metrics and Tracking for UWB Radar Sensor Networks
    Chiani, Marco
    Giorgetti, Andrea
    Mazzotti, Matteo
    Minutolo, Riccardo
    Paolini, Enrico
    [J]. 2009 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ULTRA-WIDEBAND (ICUWB 2009), 2009, : 469 - +
  • [7] Cimdins M., 2016, P 7 INT C INDOOR POS
  • [8] Cimdins M., 2019, WORKS POSIT NAVIGAT, DOI DOI 10.1109/wpnc47567.2019.8970256
  • [9] Comparison of I/Q- and Magnitude-based UWB Channel Impulse Responses for Device-free Localization
    Cimdins, Marco
    Schmidt, Sven Ole
    Hellbrueck, Horst
    [J]. 2021 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LOCALIZATION AND GNSS (ICL-GNSS), 2021,
  • [10] MAMPI-UWB-Multipath-Assisted Device-Free Localization with Magnitude and Phase Information with UWB Transceivers
    Cimdins, Marco
    Schmidt, Sven Ole
    Hellbrueck, Horst
    [J]. SENSORS, 2020, 20 (24) : 1 - 23