Comparative Study of the Sensitivity of PLA, ABS, PEEK, and PETG's Mechanical Properties to FDM Printing Process Parameters

被引:132
作者
Algarni, Mohammed [1 ]
Ghazali, Sami [2 ]
机构
[1] King Abdulaziz Univ, Fac Engn, Mech Engn Dept, POB 344, Rabigh 21911, Saudi Arabia
[2] Univ Jeddah, Fac Engn, Mech & Mat Engn Dept, POB 80327, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
关键词
fused deposition modeling; additive manufacturing; ANOVA; mechanical properties; process parameters; PLA; ABS; PEEK; PETG; TENSILE-STRENGTH; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; OPTIMIZATION; PARTS; BEHAVIOR; DESIGN; IMPACT; PREDICTION; QUALITY;
D O I
10.3390/cryst11080995
中图分类号
O7 [晶体学];
学科分类号
0702 ; 070205 ; 0703 ; 080501 ;
摘要
Significant advances in fused deposition modeling (FDM), as well as its myriad applications, have led to its growing prominence among additive manufacturing (AM) technologies. When the technology was first developed, it was used for rapid prototyping to examine and analyze a product in the design stage. FDM facilitates rapid production, requires inexpensive tools, and can fabricate complex-shaped parts; it, therefore, became popular and its use widespread. However, various FDM processing parameters have proven to affect the printed part's mechanical properties to different extents. The values for the printing process parameters are carefully selected based on the part's application. This study investigates the effects of four process parameters (raster angle, layer thickness, infill percentage, and printing speed) on the mechanical behavior of printed parts that are based on available literature data. These process parameter's influence on part's mechanical properties varies depending on the FDM material. The study focuses on four FDM materials: polylactic acid (PLA), acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), polyether ether ketone (PEEK), and polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG). This paper summarizes the state-of-the-art literature to show how sensitive the material's mechanical properties are to each process parameter. The effect of each parameter on each material was quantified and ranked using analysis of variance (ANOVA). The results show that infill percentage then layer thickness are the most influential process parameter on most of the material's mechanical properties. In addition, this work identifies gaps in existing studies and highlights opportunities for future research.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 108 条
[1]  
A Standard, 2015, 529002015 ISOASTM IN
[2]  
Abbas D, 2017, INT J ENG RES APPL W, V7, P16, DOI [10.9790/9622-0710021619, DOI 10.9790/9622-0710021619]
[3]   Process-structure-property effects on ABS bond strength in fused filament fabrication [J].
Abbott, A. C. ;
Tandon, G. P. ;
Bradford, R. L. ;
Koerner, H. ;
Baur, J. W. .
ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2018, 19 :29-38
[4]  
Abeykoon C., 2020, International Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacture, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.IJLMM.2020.03.003
[5]   Analysis on fused deposition modelling performance [J].
Abu Bakar, Nur Saaidah ;
Alkahari, Mohd Rizal ;
Boejang, Hambali .
JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY-SCIENCE A, 2010, 11 (12) :972-977
[6]   A material length scale-based methodology to assess static strength of notched additively manufactured polylactide (PLA) [J].
Ahmed, A. A. ;
Susmel, L. .
FATIGUE & FRACTURE OF ENGINEERING MATERIALS & STRUCTURES, 2018, 41 (10) :2071-2098
[7]   Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS [J].
Ahn, SH ;
Montero, M ;
Odell, D ;
Roundy, S ;
Wright, PK .
RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL, 2002, 8 (04) :248-257
[8]  
Akande StephenO., 2015, International Journal of Engineering Research Technology, V4, P196, DOI DOI 10.17577/IJERTV4IS040393
[9]   Experimental Optimization of Fused Deposition Modelling Processing Parameters: a Design-for-Manufacturing Approach [J].
Alafaghani, Ala'aldin ;
Qattawi, Ala ;
Alrawi, Buraaq ;
Guzman, Arturo .
45TH SME NORTH AMERICAN MANUFACTURING RESEARCH CONFERENCE (NAMRC 45), 2017, 10 :791-803
[10]   The Influence of Raster Angle and Moisture Content on the Mechanical Properties of PLA Parts Produced by Fused Deposition Modeling [J].
Algarni, Mohammed .
POLYMERS, 2021, 13 (02) :1-12