Open Digital Shoreline Analysis System: ODSAS v1.0

被引:14
作者
Gomez-Pazo, Alejandro [1 ]
Payo, Andres [2 ]
Paz-Delgado, Maria Victoria [3 ]
Delgadillo-Calzadilla, Miguel A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Santiago de Compostela, Dept Geog, CRETUS, Santiago De Compostela 15701, Spain
[2] British Geol Survey, Keyworth NG12 5GG, Notts, England
[3] Univ Malaga, Dept Appl Phys II, Malaga 29071, Spain
[4] Tecnol Monterrey, Sch Sci & Engn, Mexico City 01389, DF, Mexico
关键词
coastal variation; SAGA; DSAS; CliffMetrics; ProfileCrossings; CoastCR; R; ODSAS;
D O I
10.3390/jmse10010026
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
In this study, we propose a new baseline and transect method, the open-source digital shoreline analysis system (ODSAS), which is specifically designed to deal with very irregular coastlines. We have compared the ODSAS results with those obtained using the digital shoreline analysis system (DSAS). Like DSAS, our proposed method uses a single baseline parallel to the shoreline and offers the user different smoothing and spacing options to generate the transects. Our method differs from DSAS in the way that the transects' starting points and orientation are delineated by combining raster and vector objects. ODSAS uses SAGA GIS and R, which are both free open-source software programs. In this paper, we delineate the ODSAS workflow, apply it to ten study sites along the very irregular Galician coastline (NW Iberian Peninsula), and compare it with the one obtained using DSAS. We show how ODSAS produces similar values of coastline changes in terms of the most common indicators at the aggregated level (i.e., using all transects), but the values differ when compared at the transect-by-transect level. We argue herein that explicitly requesting the user to define a minimum resolution is important to reduce the subjectivity of the transect and baseline method.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Transect based analysis versus area based analysis to quantify shoreline displacement: spatial resolution issues [J].
Anfuso, Giorgio ;
Bowman, Dan ;
Danese, Chiara ;
Pranzini, Enzo .
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2016, 188 (10)
[2]  
Bakker WT, 2013, ADV SER OCEAN ENG, V34, P1, DOI 10.1142/6302
[3]   Shoreline definition and detection: A review [J].
Boak, EH ;
Turner, IL .
JOURNAL OF COASTAL RESEARCH, 2005, 21 (04) :688-703
[4]  
Burningham H., 2020, Sandy Beach Morphodynamics, P439, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-08-102927-5.00019-9, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-08-102927-5.00019-9]
[5]  
Clow J.B., 1984, P 44 AM C SURV MAPP, P309
[6]   System for Automated Geoscientific Analyses (SAGA) v. 2.1.4 [J].
Conrad, O. ;
Bechtel, B. ;
Bock, M. ;
Dietrich, H. ;
Fischer, E. ;
Gerlitz, L. ;
Wehberg, J. ;
Wichmann, V. ;
Boehner, J. .
GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 8 (07) :1991-2007
[7]   Error determination in the photogrammetric assessment of shoreline changes [J].
Del Rio, Laura ;
Javier Gracia, F. .
NATURAL HAZARDS, 2013, 65 (03) :2385-2397
[8]   NEW PHOTOGRAMMETRIC METHOD FOR DETERMINING SHORELINE EROSION [J].
DOLAN, R ;
HAYDEN, B ;
HEYWOOD, J .
COASTAL ENGINEERING, 1978, 2 (01) :21-39
[9]  
DOLAN R, 1991, J COASTAL RES, V7, P723
[10]   Overwash vulnerability assessment based on long-term washover evolution [J].
Garcia, Tiago ;
Ferreira, Oscar ;
Matias, Ana ;
Dias, Joao Alveirinho .
NATURAL HAZARDS, 2010, 54 (02) :225-244