About the Assessment of Grey Literature in Software Engineering

被引:1
作者
De Angelis, Guglielmo [1 ]
Lonetti, Francesca [2 ]
机构
[1] IASI, CNR, Rome, Italy
[2] ISTI, CNR, Pisa, Italy
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF EVALUATION AND ASSESSMENT IN SOFTWARE ENGINEERING (EASE 2021) | 2021年
关键词
Grey Literature; Quality Assessment; Likert scale; Fuzzy rating scale; LITERATURE-REVIEWS; FUZZY; CONSENSUS;
D O I
10.1145/3463274.3463362
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
There is an ongoing interest in the Software Engineering field for multivocal literature reviews including grey literature. However, at the same time, the role of the grey literature is still controversial, and the benefits of its inclusion in systematic reviews are object of discussion. Some of these arguments concern the quality assessment methods for grey literature entries, which is often considered a challenging and critical task. On the one hand, apart from a few proposals, there is a lack of an acknowledged methodological support for the inclusion of Software Engineering grey literature in systematic surveys. On the other hand, the unstructured shape of the grey literature contents could lead to bias in the evaluation process impacting on the quality of the surveys. This work leverages an approach on fuzzy Likert scales, and it proposes a methodology for managing the explicit uncertainties emerging during the assessment of entries from the grey literature. The methodology also strengthens the adoption of consensus policies that take into account the individual confidence level expressed for each of the collected scores.
引用
收藏
页码:373 / 378
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Searching and synthesising 'grey literature' and 'grey information' in public health: Critical reflections on three case studies
    Adams J.
    Hillier-Brown F.C.
    Moore H.J.
    Lake A.A.
    Araujo-Soares V.
    White M.
    Summerbell C.
    [J]. Systematic Reviews, 5 (1)
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2006, 16 COCHR IR C DUBL
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2010, THE AACODS CHECKLIST
  • [4] A categorization scheme for software engineering conference papers and its application
    Bertolino, Antonia
    Calabro, Antonello
    Lonetti, Francesca
    Marchetti, Eda
    Miranda, Breno
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, 2018, 137 : 114 - 129
  • [5] SHOULD UNPUBLISHED DATA BE INCLUDED IN METAANALYSES - CURRENT CONVICTIONS AND CONTROVERSIES
    COOK, DJ
    GUYATT, GH
    RYAN, G
    CLIFTON, J
    BUCKINGHAM, L
    WILLAN, A
    MCLLROY, W
    OXMAN, AD
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1993, 269 (21): : 2749 - 2753
  • [6] Exploratory multivariate analysis for empirical information affected by uncertainty and modeled in a fuzzy manner: a review
    D’Urso P.
    [J]. Granular Computing, 2017, 2 (4) : 225 - 247
  • [7] Six years of systematic literature reviews in software engineering: An updated tertiary study
    da Silva, Fabio Q. B.
    Santos, Andre L. M.
    Soares, Sergio
    Franca, A. Cesar C.
    Monteiro, Cleviton V. F.
    Maciel, Felipe Farias
    [J]. INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 53 (09) : 899 - 913
  • [8] Fuzzy Rating Scale-Based Questionnaires and Their Statistical Analysis
    de la Rosa de Saa, Sara
    Angeles Gil, Maria
    Gonzalez-Rodriguez, Gil
    Teresa Lopez, Maria
    Asuncion Lubiano, Maria
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2015, 23 (01) : 111 - 126
  • [9] Guidelines for including grey literature and conducting multivocal literature reviews in software engineering
    Garousi, Vahid
    Felderer, Michael
    Mantyla, Mika V.
    [J]. INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 106 : 101 - 121
  • [10] The need for multivocal literature reviews in software engineering: complementing systematic literature reviews with grey literature
    Garousi, Vahid
    Felderer, Michael
    Mantyla, Mika V.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 20TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EVALUATION AND ASSESSMENT IN SOFTWARE ENGINEERING 2016 (EASE '16), 2016,