Non-reassuring fetal status and anesthetic impact on cesarean section-delivered very-low-birthweight infants

Background There is limited evidence concerning the impact on neonatal outcomes of different types of anesthesia used for cesarean delivery due to non-reassuring fetal status (NRFS). We aimed to assess the impact of NRFS and general anesthesia (GA) on neonatal outcomes in very-low-birthweight (VLBW) infants delivered by cesarean section. Methods Data were collected relating to VLBW infants admitted to our institution. Infants were grouped into no-NRFS and NRFS groups and further subcategorized into GA and regional anesthesia (RA) subgroups. Neonatal outcomes were evaluated based on the presence of NRFS and the type of anesthesia. Results A total of 356 infants were included. The GA subgroup in the no-NRFS group had higher requirements for respiratory support. However, GA was not associated with adverse neonatal outcomes based on the multivariable logistic regression analysis except for 5 min Apgar score <5. On the other hand, NRFS was associated with an increased risk of 5 min Apgar score <5 [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.062, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.064-3.997], use of high-frequency ventilation (aOR: 2.891, 95% CI: 1.477-5.658), and pulmonary hypertension (aOR: 2.890, 95% CI: 1.436-5.819). Conclusions In our cohort of VLBW infants, NRFS was a significant risk factor for a low 5 min Apgar score, increased respiratory support requirement, and pulmonary hypertension. Accurate assessment of fetal well-being, timely delivery, and presence of a resuscitation team fully aware of perinatal conditions and anesthetic impact is important.