Are current foot-and ankle outcome measures appropriate for the evaluation of treatment for osteoarthritis of the ankle?: Evaluation of ceiling effects in foot-and ankle outcome measures

被引:16
|
作者
Veltman, Ewout S. [1 ]
Hofstad, Cheriel J. [2 ]
Witteveen, Angelique G. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] St Maartens Clin, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] St Maartens Clin, Res Dept, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
Ankle osteoarthritis; Patient reported outcome measure; Ceiling effect; Floor effect; HEALTH-STATUS; FUNCTION INDEX; SCORE; VALIDATION; DISABILITY; VALIDITY; SCALE; RESPONSIVENESS; ARTHROPLASTY; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.fas.2016.02.006
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Many PROMs used for evaluation of ankle osteoarthritis are not validated for this purpose. We hypothesize that frequently used PROMs have an early ceiling or floor effect. Methods: We prospectively collected data from patients with ankle osteoarthritis between 2011 and 2013. At baseline visit patients completed the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score, the Ankle Osteoarthritis Score, the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society scale, a visual analogue scale for pain and quality of life. Outcomes were analyzed for floor or ceiling effects. Results: 197 patients were included in the study. A floor effect was present for the AOFAS and VAS for pain in all groups. Floor and ceiling effect are absent for the FAOS outcome measure for all groups. Conclusions: Physicians should be aware of floor or ceiling effects when evaluating treatment using patient reported outcome measures. The FAOS outcome measure lacks early ceiling or floor effects. (C) 2016 European Foot and Ankle Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:168 / 172
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of the foot and ankle outcome score in patients with osteoarthritis of the ankle
    Mani, S. B.
    Do, H.
    Vulcano, E.
    Hogan, M. V.
    Lyman, S.
    Deland, J. T.
    Ellis, S. J.
    Bone & Joint Journal, 2015, 97B (05) : 662 - 667
  • [2] The Popularity of Outcome Measures Used in the Foot and Ankle Literature
    Hijji, Fady Y.
    Schneider, Andrew D.
    Pyper, Michael
    Laughlin, Richard T.
    FOOT & ANKLE SPECIALIST, 2020, 13 (01) : 58 - 68
  • [3] A Systematic Review of the Outcome Evaluation Tools for the Foot and Ankle
    Shazadeh Safavi, Pejma
    Janney, Cory
    Jupiter, Daniel
    Kunzler, Daniel
    Bui, Roger
    Panchbhavi, Vinod K.
    FOOT & ANKLE SPECIALIST, 2019, 12 (05) : 461 - 470
  • [4] Evaluation of Validity, Reliability, and Feasibility of 3 Patient-Reported Foot and Ankle Outcome Measures
    Venkatesan, Murali
    Aziz, Sheweidin
    Mahadevan, Dev
    Korim, Tawfiq
    Dias, Joe
    Bhatia, Maneesh
    JOURNAL OF FOOT & ANKLE SURGERY, 2020, 59 (03) : 507 - 512
  • [5] The problem with measuring patient perceptions of outcome with existing outcome measures in foot and ankle surgery
    Parker, J
    Nester, CJ
    Long, AF
    Barrie, J
    FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 24 (01) : 56 - 60
  • [6] Patient-reported outcome measures for the evaluation of foot and ankle function-recommendations from the research committee of the AGA
    Ackermann, Jakob
    Guenther, Daniel
    Laky, Brenda
    Mathis, Dominic
    Deichsel, Adrian
    Akguen, Doruk
    Schuettler, Karl Friedrich
    Wafaisade, Arasch
    Eggeling, Lena
    Kopf, Sebastian
    Herbst, Elmar
    ARTHROSKOPIE, 2023, 36 (02) : 128 - 134
  • [8] Foot and Ankle Outcome Instruments: Missing the Target
    Al-Mohrej, Omar A.
    Petrisor, Bradley
    CURRENT REVIEWS IN MUSCULOSKELETAL MEDICINE, 2023, 16 (06) : 246 - 254
  • [9] Validation of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) for Osteochondral Lesions of the Ankle
    Azam, Mohammad T.
    Yu, Kristin
    Butler, James
    Do, Huong
    Ellis, Scott J.
    Kennedy, John G.
    Walls, Raymond
    FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 44 (08) : 745 - 753
  • [10] Comparison of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) and the Self-Reported Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (SEFAS) in patients with foot or ankle surgery
    Arbab, Dariusch
    Kuhlmann, Katharina
    Schnurr, Christoph
    Luering, Christian
    Koenig, Dietmar
    Bouillon, Bertil
    FOOT AND ANKLE SURGERY, 2019, 25 (03) : 361 - 365