Long-Term Influence of Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) on Dental Implants after Maxillary Augmentation: Implant Survival and Success Rates

被引：17

作者：

Attia, Sameh ^{[1
]}

Narberhaus, Clara ^{[1
]}

Schaaf, Heidrun ^{[1
]}

Streckbein, Philipp ^{[1
]}

Pons-Kuehnemann, Joern ^{[2
]}

Schmitt, Christian ^{[3
]}

Neukam, Friedrich Wilhelm ^{[3
]}

Howaldt, Hans-Peter ^{[1
]}

Boettger, Sebastian ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Justus Liebig Univ Giessen, Dept Cranio Maxillofacial Surg, Klin Str 33, D-35392 Giessen, Germany

[2] Justus Liebig Univ Giessen, Fac Med, Inst Med Informat, Med Stat, Rudolf Buchheim Str 6, D-35392 Giessen, Germany

[3] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Gluckstr 11, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany

来源：

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE | 2020年 / 9卷 / 02期

关键词：

implant survival; implant success; PRP; platelet-rich plasma; long-term result; sinus lift; BONE-GRAFTS; FOLLOW-UP; AUTOGENOUS BONE; STEM-CELLS; REGENERATION; ENHANCEMENT; DENTISTRY; SCAFFOLDS; IMPACT; 5-YEAR;

D O I：

10.3390/jcm9020391

中图分类号：

R5 [内科学];

学科分类号：

1002 ; 100201 ;

摘要：

The atrophic maxilla often requires bone augmentation before implant placement to ensure long-term implant success. A previous prospective clinical trial examined the use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) during maxillary augmentation. The short-term results showed no positive effect of PRP. The aim of this study was to evaluate the same patient collective of the previous study regarding the PRP long-term impact on the survival and success of dental implants. Fifty-three patients from the previous study diagnosed with maxillary atrophy and augmented with autologous bone grafts from the iliac crest and dental implants, were included in this study. Treatment was carried out on both sides in 34 patients with a split-mouth-design in which one randomly chosen side was treated additionally with PRP, the other side was the control-side. Nineteen patients were treated only on one side and were assigned to the PRP-or the control group randomly. Implant follow-up of the patients from the previous study was performed after an average time of 13 years. Implant success was evaluated using two different success criteria. Thitry-seven patients (25 women and 12 men) were investigated in this study. Seventeen patients (12 female, 5 male) were included in the PRP group, while 20 patients (13 female, 7 male) participated in the control group. A total of 210 implants were inserted. Of these, 102 implants (48.57%) were placed in the PRP group and 108 implants (51.42%) in the control group. Out of 102 investigated implants in the PRP group, 6 were removed (survival rate 94.1%). While two of the 108 implants in the control group were loss (survival rate 98.1%). In the PRP group, the cumulative probability of survival after 15.1 years was 94.1% and in the control group, was 98.1%, with no significant difference between the two groups. Higher significant difference for the control group was found in the cumulative success probability using Albrektson criteria (p = 0.05). Positive impact of PRP on long-term implant survival and success could not be found.

引用

页数：13

共 42 条

[1]

Aimetti M, 2008, INT J PERIODONT REST, V28, P585

[2]

Albrektsson T, 1986, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V1, P11

[3] Platelet-Rich Plasma in Sinus Augmentation Procedures: A Systematic Literature Review: Part II [J].