Evaluation of Gadodiamide Versus Gadobutrol for Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging in a Rat Brain Glioma Model at 1.5 and 3 T

被引:14
作者
Morelli, John N. [1 ]
Runge, Val M. [2 ]
Vu, Lan [1 ]
Loynachan, Alan T. [3 ]
Attenberger, Ulrike I. [4 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Scott & White Clin & Hosp, Dept Radiol, Hlth Sci Ctr, Temple, TX USA
[2] Univ Texas Med Branch, Dept Radiol, Galveston, TX USA
[3] Univ Kentucky, Coll Agr, Lexington, KY USA
[4] Heidelberg Univ, Univ Med Ctr Mannheim, Med Fac Mannheim, Dept Clin Radiol & Nucl Med, D-6800 Mannheim, Germany
关键词
brain; tumor; rat; gadolinium chelate; contrast media; magnetic resonance imaging; gadobutrol; gadodiamide; 1.5; T; 3; NEPHROGENIC SYSTEMIC FIBROSIS; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; GADOPENTETATE DIMEGLUMINE; GADOBENATE DIMEGLUMINE; TUMOR ENHANCEMENT; 0.1; MMOL/KG; RENAL-ARTERIES; HUMAN SKIN; GADOLINIUM; AGENTS;
D O I
10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181f03d8a
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare equivalently-dosed (0.1 mmol/kg) gadobutrol (Gadovist) and gadodiamide (Omniscan) in a rat brain glioma model with respect to lesion signal-to-noise (SNR), contrast-to-noise (CNR), and contrast enhancement (CE) at 1.5 and 3 T. Lesion enhancement with standard-dose gadobutrol in scans performed at 1.5 T was also compared with that of half-dose gadobutrol in scans performed at 3 T. Materials and Methods: Fifty-four rats were injected with glioma cells via a plastic brain cannula and divided into 3 groups. In the first group, each animal was studied using gadodiamide and gadobutrol, with 24 hours separating injections. The 2 agents were administered in random order at a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg. Each animal was scanned using a 3 T MR system. The procedure for the second group was similar, but scanning was performed at 1.5 T. For the third group, rats were given standard or half-dose gadobutrol and scanned at 1.5 and 3 T, respectively. For all MR examinations, T1-weighted images were obtained precontrast and at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 minutes postcontrast administration. Results: At 3 T improvements in SNR, CNR, and CE with gadobutrol ranged from 11.8% to 16.0%, 30.5% to 35.4%, and 27.1% to 31.5%, respectively, and at 1.5 T from 7.0% to 11.1%, 27.1% to 35.8%, and 23.8% to 29.5%, respectively. Differences between these parameters with gadobutrol and gadodiamide were statistically significant (P < 0.0001-0.05) at all time points following contrast administration. In group 3, no significant differences in CNR or CE were found between full dose gadobutrol at 1.5 T and half-dose at 3 T, although SNR was significantly greater (28.5%-35.1%; P < 0.0008) at 3 T. Conclusion: Gadobutrol (Gadovist) demonstrates superior lesion enhancement to equivalently-dosed gadodiamide (Omniscan) in the rat brain glioma model. These results are complemented by the improved observed and theoretical safety profile of the first agent, in particular with regard to nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. The ability to image with half-dose gadobutrol at 3 T without a statistically significant decrease in lesion enhancement, compared with 1.5 T, offers an additional theoretical safety margin and potential cost-savings.
引用
收藏
页码:810 / 818
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] T1-Weighted Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Small Bowel Comparison Between 1.5 and 7 T
    Hahnemann, Maria L.
    Kraff, Oliver
    Orzada, Stephan
    Umutlu, Lale
    Kinner, Sonja
    Ladd, Mark E.
    Quick, Harald H.
    Lauenstein, Thomas C.
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2015, 50 (08) : 539 - 547
  • [42] Glial neoplasms: Dynamic contrast-enhanced T2*-weighted MR imaging
    Knopp, EA
    Cha, S
    Johnson, G
    Mazumdar, A
    Golfinos, JG
    Zagzag, D
    Miller, DC
    Kelly, PJ
    Kricheff, II
    RADIOLOGY, 1999, 211 (03) : 791 - 798
  • [43] Phase-contrast MRI and 3D-CISS versus contrast-enhanced MR cisternography on the evaluation of the aqueductal stenosis
    Oktay Algin
    Bahattin Hakyemez
    Mufit Parlak
    Neuroradiology, 2010, 52 : 99 - 108
  • [44] Phase-contrast MRI and 3D-CISS versus contrast-enhanced MR cisternography on the evaluation of the aqueductal stenosis
    Algin, Oktay
    Hakyemez, Bahattin
    Parlak, Mufit
    NEURORADIOLOGY, 2010, 52 (02) : 99 - 108
  • [45] Comparison of T2-weighted and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging at 1.5 T for assessing the local extent of cervical carcinoma
    Ayano Akita
    Hiroshi Shinmoto
    Shigenori Hayashi
    Hirotaka Akita
    Takuma Fujii
    Shuji Mikami
    Akihiro Tanimoto
    Sachio Kuribayashi
    European Radiology, 2011, 21
  • [46] Diffusion-weighted imaging versus contrast-enhanced MR imaging for the differentiation of renal oncocytomas and chromophobe renal cell carcinomas
    Zhong, Yan
    Wang, Haiyi
    Shen, Yanguang
    Guo, Aitao
    Wang, Jia
    Kang, Suhai
    Ma, Lu
    Pan, Jingjing
    Ye, Huiyi
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2017, 27 (12) : 4913 - 4922
  • [47] Comparison of T2-weighted and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging at 1.5 T for assessing the local extent of cervical carcinoma
    Akita, Ayano
    Shinmoto, Hiroshi
    Hayashi, Shigenori
    Akita, Hirotaka
    Fujii, Takuma
    Mikami, Shuji
    Tanimoto, Akihiro
    Kuribayashi, Sachio
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2011, 21 (09) : 1850 - 1857
  • [48] Evaluation of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Detecting Renal Scarring in a Rat Injury Model
    Wang, Bingyin
    Sommer, Graham
    Spielman, Daniel
    Shortliffe, Linda M. Dairiki
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2010, 31 (05) : 1132 - 1136
  • [49] Dynamic contrast-enhanced 3-T MR imaging in cervical cancer before and after concurrent chemoradiotherapy
    Kim, Jae-Hun
    Kim, Chan Kyo
    Park, Byung Kwan
    Park, Sung Yoon
    Huh, Seung Jae
    Kim, Bohyun
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (11) : 2533 - 2539
  • [50] Current State-of-the-Art 1.5 T and 3 T Extracranial Carotid Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography
    DeMarco, J. Kevin
    Willinek, Winfried A.
    Finn, J. Paul
    Huston, John, III
    NEUROIMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2012, 22 (02) : 235 - +