Evaluation of Gadodiamide Versus Gadobutrol for Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging in a Rat Brain Glioma Model at 1.5 and 3 T

被引:14
作者
Morelli, John N. [1 ]
Runge, Val M. [2 ]
Vu, Lan [1 ]
Loynachan, Alan T. [3 ]
Attenberger, Ulrike I. [4 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Scott & White Clin & Hosp, Dept Radiol, Hlth Sci Ctr, Temple, TX USA
[2] Univ Texas Med Branch, Dept Radiol, Galveston, TX USA
[3] Univ Kentucky, Coll Agr, Lexington, KY USA
[4] Heidelberg Univ, Univ Med Ctr Mannheim, Med Fac Mannheim, Dept Clin Radiol & Nucl Med, D-6800 Mannheim, Germany
关键词
brain; tumor; rat; gadolinium chelate; contrast media; magnetic resonance imaging; gadobutrol; gadodiamide; 1.5; T; 3; NEPHROGENIC SYSTEMIC FIBROSIS; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; GADOPENTETATE DIMEGLUMINE; GADOBENATE DIMEGLUMINE; TUMOR ENHANCEMENT; 0.1; MMOL/KG; RENAL-ARTERIES; HUMAN SKIN; GADOLINIUM; AGENTS;
D O I
10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181f03d8a
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare equivalently-dosed (0.1 mmol/kg) gadobutrol (Gadovist) and gadodiamide (Omniscan) in a rat brain glioma model with respect to lesion signal-to-noise (SNR), contrast-to-noise (CNR), and contrast enhancement (CE) at 1.5 and 3 T. Lesion enhancement with standard-dose gadobutrol in scans performed at 1.5 T was also compared with that of half-dose gadobutrol in scans performed at 3 T. Materials and Methods: Fifty-four rats were injected with glioma cells via a plastic brain cannula and divided into 3 groups. In the first group, each animal was studied using gadodiamide and gadobutrol, with 24 hours separating injections. The 2 agents were administered in random order at a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg. Each animal was scanned using a 3 T MR system. The procedure for the second group was similar, but scanning was performed at 1.5 T. For the third group, rats were given standard or half-dose gadobutrol and scanned at 1.5 and 3 T, respectively. For all MR examinations, T1-weighted images were obtained precontrast and at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 minutes postcontrast administration. Results: At 3 T improvements in SNR, CNR, and CE with gadobutrol ranged from 11.8% to 16.0%, 30.5% to 35.4%, and 27.1% to 31.5%, respectively, and at 1.5 T from 7.0% to 11.1%, 27.1% to 35.8%, and 23.8% to 29.5%, respectively. Differences between these parameters with gadobutrol and gadodiamide were statistically significant (P < 0.0001-0.05) at all time points following contrast administration. In group 3, no significant differences in CNR or CE were found between full dose gadobutrol at 1.5 T and half-dose at 3 T, although SNR was significantly greater (28.5%-35.1%; P < 0.0008) at 3 T. Conclusion: Gadobutrol (Gadovist) demonstrates superior lesion enhancement to equivalently-dosed gadodiamide (Omniscan) in the rat brain glioma model. These results are complemented by the improved observed and theoretical safety profile of the first agent, in particular with regard to nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. The ability to image with half-dose gadobutrol at 3 T without a statistically significant decrease in lesion enhancement, compared with 1.5 T, offers an additional theoretical safety margin and potential cost-savings.
引用
收藏
页码:810 / 818
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging evaluation of osteosarcoma response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy
    Reddick, WE
    Bhargava, R
    Taylor, JS
    Meyer, WH
    Fletcher, BD
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1995, 5 (06) : 689 - 694
  • [32] Evaluation by contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the lateral border zone in reperfused myocardial infarction in a cat model
    Jeong, AK
    Choi, SI
    Kim, DH
    Park, SB
    Lee, SS
    Choi, SH
    Lim, TH
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2001, 2 (01) : 21 - 27
  • [33] Comparison of T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging for evaluating perianal fistulas
    Baik, Jiyeon
    Kim, Seung Ho
    Lee, Yedaun
    Yoon, Jung-Hee
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2017, 44 : 16 - 21
  • [34] CEREBRAL BLOOD-FLOW - ASSESSMENT WITH DYNAMIC CONTRAST-ENHANCED T2-STAR-WEIGHTED MR IMAGING AT 1.5-T
    EDELMAN, RR
    MATTLE, HP
    ATKINSON, DJ
    HILL, T
    FINN, JP
    MAYMAN, C
    RONTHAL, M
    HOOGEWOUD, HM
    KLEEFIELD, J
    RADIOLOGY, 1990, 176 (01) : 211 - 220
  • [35] 3-T contrast-enhanced MR angiography with parallel imaging in cerebral venous and sinus thrombosis
    Lettau, M.
    Laible, M.
    Barrows, R. J.
    Heiland, S.
    Bendszus, M.
    Haehnel, S.
    JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2011, 38 (05) : 275 - 282
  • [36] Impact of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in 1.5 T versus 3 T MRI for clinically significant prostate cancer detection
    Ziayee, F.
    Schimmoeller, L.
    Blondin, D.
    Boschheidgen, M.
    Wilms, LM.
    Vach, M.
    Arsov, C.
    Albers, P.
    Antoch, G.
    Ullrich, T.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 156
  • [37] ULTRAFAST CONTRAST-ENHANCED MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING OF CONGENITAL HYDRONEPHROSIS IN A RAT MODEL
    FICHTNER, J
    SPIELMAN, D
    HERFKENS, R
    BOINEAU, FG
    LEWY, JE
    SHORTLIFFE, LMD
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1994, 152 (02) : 682 - 687
  • [38] Supra-aortic low-dose contrast-enhanced time-resolved magnetic resonance (MR) angiography at 3 T: comparison with time-of-flight MR angiography and high-resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography
    Lee, Youn-Joo
    Kim, Bum-soo
    Koo, Ja-Sung
    Kim, Bom-Yi
    Jang, Jinhee
    Choi, Hyun Seok
    Jung, So-Lyung
    Ahn, Kook-Jin
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2015, 56 (06) : 673 - 680
  • [39] Contrast-enhanced MR 3D angiography in the assessment of brain AVMs
    Unlu, Ercument
    Temizoz, Osman
    Albayram, Sait
    Genchellac, Hakan
    Hamamcioglu, M. Kemal
    Kurt, Imran
    Demir, M. Kemal
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2006, 60 (03) : 367 - 378
  • [40] KINETICS OF PATHOLOGICAL BLOOD-BRAIN-BARRIER PERMEABILITY IN AN ASTROCYTIC GLIOMA USING CONTRAST-ENHANCED MR
    SCHMIEDL, UP
    KENNEY, J
    MARAVILLA, KR
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 1992, 13 (01) : 5 - 14