Evaluation of Gadodiamide Versus Gadobutrol for Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging in a Rat Brain Glioma Model at 1.5 and 3 T

被引:14
|
作者
Morelli, John N. [1 ]
Runge, Val M. [2 ]
Vu, Lan [1 ]
Loynachan, Alan T. [3 ]
Attenberger, Ulrike I. [4 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Scott & White Clin & Hosp, Dept Radiol, Hlth Sci Ctr, Temple, TX USA
[2] Univ Texas Med Branch, Dept Radiol, Galveston, TX USA
[3] Univ Kentucky, Coll Agr, Lexington, KY USA
[4] Heidelberg Univ, Univ Med Ctr Mannheim, Med Fac Mannheim, Dept Clin Radiol & Nucl Med, D-6800 Mannheim, Germany
关键词
brain; tumor; rat; gadolinium chelate; contrast media; magnetic resonance imaging; gadobutrol; gadodiamide; 1.5; T; 3; NEPHROGENIC SYSTEMIC FIBROSIS; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; GADOPENTETATE DIMEGLUMINE; GADOBENATE DIMEGLUMINE; TUMOR ENHANCEMENT; 0.1; MMOL/KG; RENAL-ARTERIES; HUMAN SKIN; GADOLINIUM; AGENTS;
D O I
10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181f03d8a
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare equivalently-dosed (0.1 mmol/kg) gadobutrol (Gadovist) and gadodiamide (Omniscan) in a rat brain glioma model with respect to lesion signal-to-noise (SNR), contrast-to-noise (CNR), and contrast enhancement (CE) at 1.5 and 3 T. Lesion enhancement with standard-dose gadobutrol in scans performed at 1.5 T was also compared with that of half-dose gadobutrol in scans performed at 3 T. Materials and Methods: Fifty-four rats were injected with glioma cells via a plastic brain cannula and divided into 3 groups. In the first group, each animal was studied using gadodiamide and gadobutrol, with 24 hours separating injections. The 2 agents were administered in random order at a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg. Each animal was scanned using a 3 T MR system. The procedure for the second group was similar, but scanning was performed at 1.5 T. For the third group, rats were given standard or half-dose gadobutrol and scanned at 1.5 and 3 T, respectively. For all MR examinations, T1-weighted images were obtained precontrast and at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 minutes postcontrast administration. Results: At 3 T improvements in SNR, CNR, and CE with gadobutrol ranged from 11.8% to 16.0%, 30.5% to 35.4%, and 27.1% to 31.5%, respectively, and at 1.5 T from 7.0% to 11.1%, 27.1% to 35.8%, and 23.8% to 29.5%, respectively. Differences between these parameters with gadobutrol and gadodiamide were statistically significant (P < 0.0001-0.05) at all time points following contrast administration. In group 3, no significant differences in CNR or CE were found between full dose gadobutrol at 1.5 T and half-dose at 3 T, although SNR was significantly greater (28.5%-35.1%; P < 0.0008) at 3 T. Conclusion: Gadobutrol (Gadovist) demonstrates superior lesion enhancement to equivalently-dosed gadodiamide (Omniscan) in the rat brain glioma model. These results are complemented by the improved observed and theoretical safety profile of the first agent, in particular with regard to nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. The ability to image with half-dose gadobutrol at 3 T without a statistically significant decrease in lesion enhancement, compared with 1.5 T, offers an additional theoretical safety margin and potential cost-savings.
引用
收藏
页码:810 / 818
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Time optimization of gadobutrol-enhanced brain MRI for metastases and primary tumors using a dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging
    Jeemin Seo
    Changmok Lim
    Kye Young Lee
    Young-Cho Koh
    Won-Jin Moon
    BMC Medical Imaging, 22
  • [22] T1 Hyperintense Renal Lesions: Characterization with Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging versus Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging
    Kim, Sooah
    Jain, Monica
    Harris, Andrew B.
    Lee, Vivian S.
    Babb, James S.
    Sigmund, Eric E.
    Rueff, Laura E.
    Taouli, Bachir
    RADIOLOGY, 2009, 251 (03) : 796 - 807
  • [23] Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic-resonance angiography of the renal arteries: Interindividual comparison of 0.2 mmol/kg gadobutrol at 1.5 T and 0.1 mmol/kg gadobenate dimeglumine at 3.0 T
    Ulrike I. Attenberger
    Henrik J. Michaely
    Bernd J. Wintersperger
    Steven P. Sourbron
    Klaus-Peter Lodemann
    Maximilian F. Reiser
    Stefan O. Schoenberg
    European Radiology, 2008, 18 : 1260 - 1268
  • [24] Interscanner Comparison of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Prostate Cancer 1.5 Versus 3 T MRI
    Sertdemir, Metin
    Schoenberg, Stefan O.
    Sourbron, Steven
    Hausmann, Daniel
    Heinzelbecker, Julia
    Michaely, Henrik J.
    Dinter, Dietmar J.
    Weidner, Anja M.
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2013, 48 (02) : 92 - 97
  • [25] Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging in the Evaluation of Patients with Prostate Cancer
    McMahon, Colm J.
    Bloch, B. Nicolas
    Lenkinski, Robert E.
    Rofsky, Neil M.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2009, 17 (02) : 363 - +
  • [26] Time optimization of gadobutrol-enhanced brain MRI for metastases and primary tumors using a dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging
    Seo, Jeemin
    Lim, Changmok
    Lee, Kye Young
    Koh, Young-Cho
    Moon, Won-Jin
    BMC MEDICAL IMAGING, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [27] Contrast-enhanced T2-FLAIR MR imaging in patients with uveitis
    Diego A. Herrera
    Sergio Franco
    Sebastián Bustamante
    Sergio A. Vargas
    Martin Ochoa-Escudero
    Arthur B. Dublin
    Miguel Cuevas
    International Ophthalmology, 2017, 37 : 507 - 512
  • [28] In Vivo Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging of Direct Infusion into Rat Peripheral Nerves
    Chen, Xiaoming
    Astary, Garrett W.
    Mareci, Thomas H.
    Sarntinoranont, Malisa
    ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 39 (11) : 2823 - 2834
  • [29] Comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and quantitative SPECT in a rat glioma model
    Skinner, Jack T.
    Yankeelov, Thomas E.
    Peterson, Todd E.
    Does, Mark D.
    CONTRAST MEDIA & MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2012, 7 (06) : 494 - 500
  • [30] ACUTE CEREBRAL-ISCHEMIA - EVALUATION WITH DYNAMIC CONTRAST-ENHANCED MR IMAGING AND MR ANGIOGRAPHY
    WARACH, S
    WEI, L
    RONTHAL, M
    EDELMAN, RR
    RADIOLOGY, 1992, 182 (01) : 41 - 47