Proximal femoral nailing is superior to hemiarthroplasty in AO/OTA A2 and A3 intertrochanteric femur fractures in the elderly: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis

被引:41
|
作者
Kumar, Prasoon [1 ]
Rajnish, Rajesh Kumar [1 ]
Sharma, Siddhartha [1 ]
Dhillon, Mandeep Singh [1 ]
机构
[1] Post Grad Inst Med Educ & Res, Dept Orthopaed, Sect 12, Chandigarh 160012, India
关键词
Proximal femoral nail; PFN; Bipolar hemiarthroplasty; BPH; HHS; Unstable intertrochanteric fractures; VITAMIN-D DEFICIENCY; CEMENTLESS BIPOLAR HEMIARTHROPLASTY; CALCAR-REPLACEMENT; HIP FRACTURE; FIXATION; ANTIROTATION;
D O I
10.1007/s00264-019-04351-9
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction Unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures in the elderly require either fixation or joint sacrificing surgery; proximal femoral nail (PFN) and bipolar hemiarthroplasties (BPH) are the most common interventions. PFN is considered to be the ideal construct for these fractures; however, the usage of hemiarthroplasties to facilitate earlier mobilization has been on a rise. Currently there is no consensus on the superiority of one of these two techniques over the other and the present review was done to determine this. Research question Is PFN a better alternative to BPH for unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures in the elderly? Objective The present systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to determine the superiority of PFN over BPH by comparing the primary outcomes like mortality, Harris Hip scores (HHS), complications, and re-operations. Additionally, secondary outcomes like blood loss, duration of surgery, and period of hospital stays were also compared. Methodology Three databases of PubMed, EMBASE, and SCOPUS were searched for relevant articles that directly compared PFN and BPH in unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures in the elderly. Results We analyzed a total of seven studies published between the years 2005 to 2017. There were four retrospective and three prospective randomized controlled studies. The number of patients in these studies ranged from 53 to 303. Primary outcomes There was a significant difference in HHS between two groups with standard mean difference of - 0.51 (range - 0.67 to -0.36), favouring the PFN group. The rate of mortality was higher in the BPH group with odds ratio of 2.07 (range 1.40-3.08). Implant-related complications like fractures and subsidence were more in BPH group but this was not significant. Secondary outcomes Mean surgical time (standard mean difference 2.19) and blood loss (3.75) were significantly less in the PFN group. The duration of hospital stay was also found to be significantly less in the PFN group (2.66). Conclusion Proximal femoral nails are superior to bipolar hemiarthroplasties for unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures in the elderly. PFN imparts better functional outcomes and has lower rates of overall mortality. Additionally it is faster surgery, with lesser blood loss contributing to better results.
引用
收藏
页码:623 / 633
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A systematic review and meta-analysis of cemented and uncemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in elderly patients over 60 years old
    Fu, Mengyu
    Shen, Jieliang
    Ren, Zhoukui
    Lv, Yingwen
    Wang, Jiangang
    Jiang, Wei
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2023, 10
  • [22] Risk of surgical site infection after hip hemiarthroplasty of femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Silas, Ubong
    Berberich, Christof
    Anyimiah, Priscilla
    Szymski, Dominik
    Rupp, Markus
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2024, 144 (08) : 3685 - 3695
  • [23] Comparative assessment of early versus delayed surgery to treat proximal femoral fractures in elderly patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Peng
    Shen, Xiaotian
    Xu, Weimin
    Yao, Wanglin
    Ma, Ning
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 68 : 63 - 71
  • [24] Is proximal femoral nail antirotation superior to gamma nail and dynamic hip screw in treatment of intertrochanteric fractures? a pairwise and network meta-analysis
    Yin, Si
    Dai, Xing
    Zhang, Dangfeng
    Du, Heng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2016, 9 (12): : 22993 - 23007
  • [25] Hemiarthroplasty compared with total hip arthroplasty for displaced fractures of femoral neck in the elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis of fourteen randomized clinical trials
    Xu, Danfeng
    Li, Xuting
    Bi, Fanggang
    Ma, Chiyuan
    Lu, Lei
    Cao, Jinhui
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2018, 11 (06): : 5430 - 5443
  • [26] Reverse shoulder arthroplasty vs. hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis update
    Han, Peng-Fei
    Yang, Su
    Wang, Yue-Peng
    Hou, Xue-Dong
    Li, Yuan
    Li, Xi-Yong
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2022, 24 (04)
  • [27] Comparison of helical blade versus lag screw in intertrochanteric fractures of the elderly treated with proximal femoral nail: A meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials
    Huang, Jiazhi
    Wei, Qingjun
    JOINT DISEASES AND RELATED SURGERY, 2022, 33 (03) : 695 - 704
  • [28] Flexible Intramedullary Nailing of Femoral Shaft Fractures in Children Weighing ≥40 kg: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Makarewich, Christopher A.
    Talwar, Divya
    Baldwin, Keith D.
    Swarup, Ishaan
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 2020, 40 (10) : 562 - 568
  • [29] Comparison of clinical outcomes with hip replacement versus PFNA in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly A systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA)
    Chen, Junming
    Yue, Chen
    He, Peilin
    Huang, Zeling
    Li, Li
    Zhang, Xue
    Fan, Yanan
    Liu, Youwen
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (09) : E24166
  • [30] Reoperation rates after proximal femur fracture fixation with single and dual screw femoral nails: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sivakumar, Arjun
    Edwards, Suzanne
    Millar, Stuart
    Thewlis, Dominic
    Rickman, Mark
    EFORT OPEN REVIEWS, 2022, 7 (07) : 506 - 515