The Characteristics, Activities and Goals of Environmental Organizations Engaged in Advocacy Within the Australian Environmental Movement

被引:15
作者
Gulliver, Robyn [1 ]
Fielding, Kelly S. [1 ]
Louis, Winnifred [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Commun & Arts, Room 317,Level 3,Joyce Ackroyd Bldg,Bldg 37, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Sch Psychol, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMUNICATION-A JOURNAL OF NATURE AND CULTURE | 2020年 / 14卷 / 05期
关键词
Environmental movement; environmental communication; environmental organizations; advocacy; campaigns; CLIMATE-CHANGE; COLLECTIVE ACTION; DEFICIT MODEL; SOCIAL MEDIA; POLICY; NGOS; COMMUNICATION; POLITICS; PROTEST; OPPORTUNITIES;
D O I
10.1080/17524032.2019.1697326
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
A sustained groundswell of grassroots advocacy is required to trigger the urgent action required to solve our many global environmental problems. To gain a comprehensive understanding of the characteristics, issue focus, tactics and targets of this grassroots advocacy, we analyzed the website communications of 497 environmental movement organizations (EMOs) undertaking advocacy in Australia. Findings indicate that Conservation and Protection issues continue to dominate, although a wave of new climate change-related issue groups have emerged in recent years. Almost half of all groups operate at a local level. EMO websites suggest that their actions are primarily normative (vs. radical), and focus primarily on information provision. Of the 960 campaign targets identified, just over half were political, however, climate change, renewable energy and sustainability campaigns more often targeted individuals or business entities. We identify the areas where further investigation could advance the research agenda on grassroots environmental advocacy.
引用
收藏
页码:614 / 627
页数:14
相关论文
共 81 条
  • [1] *ABS, 2016, HOUS US INF TECHN
  • [2] Online collective identity: The case of the environmental movement
    Ackland, Robert
    O'Neil, Mathieu
    [J]. SOCIAL NETWORKS, 2011, 33 (03) : 177 - 190
  • [3] Agarwal N., 2011, INT C NETW DIG TECHN
  • [4] Amplifying public opinion: The policy impact of the US environmental movement
    Agnone, Jon
    [J]. SOCIAL FORCES, 2007, 85 (04) : 1593 - 1620
  • [5] Advocacy Activities of Nonprofit Human Service Organizations: A Critical Review
    Almog-Bar, Michal
    Schmid, Hillel
    [J]. NONPROFIT AND VOLUNTARY SECTOR QUARTERLY, 2014, 43 (01) : 11 - 35
  • [6] SAMPLING SOCIAL MOVEMENT ORGANIZATIONS
    Andrews, Kenneth T.
    Edwards, Bob
    Al-Turk, Akram
    Hunter, Anne Kristen
    [J]. MOBILIZATION, 2016, 21 (02) : 231 - 246
  • [7] Making the News: Movement Organizations, Media Attention, and the Public Agenda
    Andrews, Kenneth T.
    Caren, Neal
    [J]. AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2010, 75 (06) : 841 - 866
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2011, POWER MOVEMENT SOCIA, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511973529
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2013, ARXIV13080239
  • [10] Australian Government, 2012, AUSTR CHAR NOT FOR P