Public Service Ethics vs. Social Media Use in Russia

被引:0
作者
Bundin, Mikhail [1 ]
Martynov, Aleksei [1 ]
Avrutin, Yury [2 ]
机构
[1] Lobachevsky State Univ Nizhny Novgorod UNN, Nizhnii Novgorod, Russia
[2] St Petersburg Univ MIA, St Petersburg, Russia
来源
DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION AND GLOBAL SOCIETY (DTGS 2017) | 2017年 / 745卷
关键词
Public administration; Open Government; Social media; Public service ethics; Russia; LOCAL-GOVERNMENTS; GOVERNANCE; ADOPTION; AFFORDANCES; CHALLENGES; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-69784-0_20
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
The wide use of social media by public authorities and officials is now an international trend now. Modern political and government leaders find here great opportunities to promote their policies and boost citizens' participation. On the other hand, recently adopted legal and official documents e.g. Guidelines, Codes of Conduct demonstrate that the use of social media by public servants and employees is not so encouraged or sometimes explicitly prohibited even when it is for purely 'personal' purposes. Thus, it becomes evident that national governments seek now to control online activities of their employees explaining it mainly by ethical reasons in order to guarantee fairness, impartiality and neutrality of public service and to avoid any adverse interference. For this purpose, Russia adopted in 2016 a federal law creating an obligation of public servants to declare any use of social media before their authority. This new initiative could shift the existing balance between the right to privacy and public service ethics especially in absence of any coherent and explicit regulation on social media use by public employees in Russia.
引用
收藏
页码:231 / 242
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Ethics for Mental Health Influencers: MFTs as Public Social Media Personalities [J].
Nicholas T. Triplett ;
Alexia Kingzette ;
Lauren Slivinski ;
Tsuki Niu .
Contemporary Family Therapy, 2022, 44 :125-135
[32]   Social media, trust, and disaster: Does trust in public and nonprofit organizations explain social media use during a disaster? [J].
Williams, Brian D. ;
Valero, Jesus N. ;
Kim, Kyungwoo .
QUALITY & QUANTITY, 2018, 52 (02) :537-550
[33]   Gays vs. Russia: media representations, vulnerable bodies and the construction of a (post)modern West [J].
Wiedlack, M. Katharina .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENGLISH STUDIES, 2017, 21 (03) :241-257
[34]   Joanne Public vs. Joe Public: News Sourcing and Gender Imbalance on Argentine Digital Media [J].
Mitchelstein, Eugenia ;
Andelsman, Victoria ;
Boczkowski, Pablo J. .
DIGITAL JOURNALISM, 2019, 7 (10) :1311-1327
[35]   Exploring citizens attitudes towards social media use by public administrations: the case of Spanish local governments [J].
Ignacio Criado, J. ;
Villodre, Julian .
TOGETHER IN THE UNSTABLE WORLD: DIGITAL GOVERNMENT AND SOLIDARITY, 2023, :153-164
[36]   Online activists vs. Kraft foods: A case of social media hijacking [J].
Veil, Shari R. ;
Reno, Jenna ;
Freihaut, Rebecca ;
Oldham, Jordan .
PUBLIC RELATIONS REVIEW, 2015, 41 (01) :103-108
[37]   Text vs. Images: On the Viability of Social Media to Assess Earthquake Damage [J].
Liang, Yuan ;
Caverlee, James ;
Mander, John .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WORLD WIDE WEB (WWW'13 COMPANION), 2013, :1003-1006
[38]   PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS' USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA [J].
Ogbonnaya, Ugorji I. ;
Mji, Andile .
EDULEARN15: 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2015, :1506-1512
[39]   Mechanisms for enhancing the use of social media for knowledge sharing by the construction professionals [J].
Etemadi, Ramtin ;
Hon, Carol K. H. ;
Manley, Karen ;
Murphy, Glen .
CONSTRUCTION INNOVATION-ENGLAND, 2022, 22 (02) :284-304
[40]   Application of two under-researched typologies in crisis communication: Ethics of justice vs. care and public relations vs. legal strategies [J].
Tao, Weiting ;
Kim, Sora .
PUBLIC RELATIONS REVIEW, 2017, 43 (04) :690-699