Rigorous Free Energy Perturbation Approach to Estimating Relative Binding Affinities between Ligands with Multiple Protonation and Tautomeric States

被引:45
作者
de Oliveira, Cesar [2 ]
Yu, Haoyu S. [1 ]
Chen, Wei [1 ]
Abel, Robert [1 ]
Wang, Lingle [1 ]
机构
[1] Schrodinger Inc, 120 West 45th St, New York, NY 10036 USA
[2] Schrodinger Inc, 10201 Wateridge Circle,Suite 220, San Diego, CA 92121 USA
关键词
RELIABLE PREDICTION; BLIND PREDICTION; DRUG DISCOVERY; ACCURATE; INHIBITORS; SIMULATIONS; MOLECULES; POSES;
D O I
10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00826
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Accurate prediction of ligand binding affinities is of key importance in small molecule lead optimization and a central task in computational medicinal chemistry. Over the years, advances in both computer hardware and computational methodologies have established free energy perturbation (FEP) methods as among the most reliable and rigorous approaches to compute protein-ligand binding free energies. However, accurate description of ionization and tautomerism of ligands is still a major challenge in structure-based prediction of binding affinities. Druglike molecules are often weak acid or bases with multiple accessible protonation and tautomeric states that can contribute significantly to the binding process. To address this issue, we introduce in this work the pK(a) and tautomeric state correction approach. This approach is based on free energy perturbation formalism and provides a rigorous treatment of the ionization and tautomeric equilibria of ligands in solution and in the protein complexes. A series of Kinesin Spindle Protein (KSP) and Factor Xa inhibitor molecules were used as test cases. Our results demonstrate that the pK(a) and tautomeric state correction approach is able to rigorously and accurately incorporate multiple protonation and tautomeric states in the binding affinity calculations.
引用
收藏
页码:424 / 435
页数:12
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Advancing Drug Discovery through Enhanced Free Energy Calculations [J].
Abel, Robert ;
Wang, Lingle ;
Harder, Edward D. ;
Berne, B. J. ;
Friesner, Richard A. .
ACCOUNTS OF CHEMICAL RESEARCH, 2017, 50 (07) :1625-1632
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, SCHROD SUIT 2018 PRO
[3]   Blind prediction of cyclohexane-water distribution coefficients from the SAMPL5 challenge [J].
Bannan, Caitlin C. ;
Burley, Kalistyn H. ;
Chiu, Michael ;
Shirts, Michael R. ;
Gilson, Michael K. ;
Mobley, David L. .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2016, 30 (11) :927-944
[4]   EFFICIENT ESTIMATION OF FREE-ENERGY DIFFERENCES FROM MONTE-CARLO DATA [J].
BENNETT, CH .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 1976, 22 (02) :245-268
[5]  
Berendsen H., 1981, INTERMOLECULAR FORCE, V14, P331, DOI [10.1007/978-94-015-7658-1_21, DOI 10.1007/978-94-015-7658-1_21]
[6]   Multiconformation, Density Functional Theory-Based pKa Prediction in Application to Large, Flexible Organic Molecules with Diverse Functional Groups [J].
Bochevarov, Art D. ;
Watson, Mark A. ;
Greenwood, Jeremy R. .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION, 2016, 12 (12) :6001-6019
[7]   Accurate Calculation of Relative Binding Free Energies between Ligands with Different Net Charges [J].
Chen, Wei ;
Deng, Yuqing ;
Russell, Ellery ;
Wu, Yujie ;
Abel, Robert ;
Wang, Lingle .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION, 2018, 14 (12) :6346-6358
[8]  
Chipot C., 2007, FREE ENERGY CALCULAT, V86
[9]   Alchemical free energy methods for drug discovery: progress and challenges [J].
Chodera, John D. ;
Mobley, David L. ;
Shirts, Michael R. ;
Dixon, Richard W. ;
Branson, Kim ;
Pande, Vijay S. .
CURRENT OPINION IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2011, 21 (02) :150-160
[10]   Accuracy Assessment and Automation of Free Energy Calculations for Drug Design [J].
Christ, Clara D. ;
Fox, Thomas .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2014, 54 (01) :108-120