Thermally double coupled reactor coupling aqueous phase glycerol reforming and methanol synthesis

被引:12
作者
Thirabunjongcharoen, Sasinun [1 ]
Bumroongsakulsawat, Palang [1 ]
Praserthdam, Piyasan [1 ]
Charojrochkul, Sumittra [2 ]
Assabumrungrat, Suttichai [1 ]
Kim-Lohsoontorn, Pattaraporn [1 ]
机构
[1] Chulalongkorn Univ, Ctr Excellence Catalysis & Catalyt React Engn, Dept Chem Engn, Fac Engn, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
[2] Natl Met & Mat Technol Ctr MTEC, Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand
关键词
Thermally double coupled reactor; CFD; Methanol synthesis; Aqueous phase glycerol reforming; Hydrogen production; CO2; conversion; ENDOTHERMIC REACTIONS; HYDROGEN-PRODUCTION; CATALYSTS; CO2; DEHYDROGENATION; CYCLOHEXANE; STABILITY; KINETICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.cattod.2020.03.043
中图分类号
O69 [应用化学];
学科分类号
081704 ;
摘要
This study proposes a novel thermally double coupled reactor (TDCR) coupling endothermic aqueous phase glycerol reforming (APGR) with exothermic methanol synthesis (MS), utilizing heat transfer between both channels. Hydrogen (H-2) source and availability are known as barriers to carbon dioxide conversion to methanol via MS reaction. Waste glycerol could be a source of H-2 through APGR reaction. The steady state TDCR model consists of two concentric channels: 1) an inner tube to which CO2 and H-2 are fed as reactants for exothermic MS and 2) an outer annulus channel through which glycerol and steam are supplied for endothermic APGR. The TDCR could operate without external heat supply when two reactions were coupled. A computational fluid dynamic (CFD) model was established to study this TDCR. APGR was assumed to be catalyzed by Pt/Al2O3 at 200 250 degrees C and 20 25 bar. MS was modeled with a Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 catalyst at 200 250 degrees C and 50 80 bar. Heat transfer from the exothermic channel to the endothermic channel helped increase glycerol conversion while methanol productivity is the same as conventional reactor. Cocurrent and countercurrent feed configurations were compared and it was found that the cocurrent configuration offered more uniform temperature distribution in the channel with a larger temperature difference between the two channels. On the other hand, hot spots and cold spots were observed in the countercurrent configuration. Effects of operating conditions of both channels: H-2:CO2 and glycerol:steam ratios, inlet temperature, pressure, and total feed flow rate on reactor performance significantly affected the performance of TDCR.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 190
页数:10
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [21] King D.L., 2012, APPL CATAL B-ENVIRON, V99, P206
  • [22] Novel efficient process for methanol synthesis by CO2 hydrogenation
    Kiss, Anton A.
    Pragt, J. J.
    Vos, H. J.
    Bargeman, G.
    de Groot, M. T.
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2016, 284 : 260 - 269
  • [23] The effect of alkali metals doping on properties of Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 catalyst for water gas shift
    Kowalik, Pawel
    Prochniak, Wieslaw
    Borowiecki, Tadeusz
    [J]. CATALYSIS TODAY, 2011, 176 (01) : 144 - 148
  • [24] The effect of metal additives in Cu/Zn/Al2O3 as a catalyst for low-pressure methanol synthesis in an oil-cooled annulus reactor
    Lee, Woo Jin
    Bordoloi, Ankur
    Patel, Jim
    Bhatelia, Tejas
    [J]. CATALYSIS TODAY, 2020, 343 : 183 - 190
  • [25] Hydrogenolysis of glycerol with in-situ produced H2 by aqueous-phase reforming of glycerol using Pt-modified Ir-ReOx/SiO2 catalyst
    Liu, Shiyang
    Tamura, Masazumi
    Shen, Zheng
    Zhang, Yalei
    Nakagawa, Yoshinao
    Tomishige, Keiichi
    [J]. CATALYSIS TODAY, 2018, 303 : 106 - 116
  • [26] Methanol formation from carbon dioxide hydrogenation using Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 catalyst
    Lo, I-Chi
    Wu, Ho-Shing
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE TAIWAN INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERS, 2019, 98 : 124 - 131
  • [27] Methanol FUELS, 2019, METH FUEL ENV
  • [28] Hydrogen looping approach in optimized methanol thermally coupled membrane reactor
    Mirvakili, A.
    Rostami, M.
    Paymooni, K.
    Rahimpour, M. R.
    Moghtaderi, B.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2012, 37 (01) : 235 - 249
  • [29] Performance comparison of different membrane reactors for combined methanol synthesis and biogas upgrading
    Ountaksinkul, Khunnawat
    Vas-Umnuay, Paravee
    Kasempremchit, Nattapong
    Bumroongsakulsawat, Palang
    Kim-Lohsoontorn, Pattaraporn
    Jiwanuruk, Tara
    Assabumrungrat, Suttichai
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING AND PROCESSING-PROCESS INTENSIFICATION, 2019, 136 : 191 - 200
  • [30] Perry H.R., 2008, PERRYS CHEM ENG HDB