Ephedrine pretreatment for nasotracheal intubation-related epistaxis in maxillofacial surgery with sufficient lubrication: A randomized clinical trial

被引:3
作者
Wang, Lei [1 ]
Liu, Quanle [1 ]
Xiaoming, Deng [1 ]
Wang, Ye [1 ]
Xiang, Guihua [1 ]
Wei, Lingxin [1 ]
Yang, Dong [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Plast Surg Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
adequate lubrication; ephedrine; epistaxis; nasotracheal intubation; NASAL INTUBATION; TUBE; NOSTRIL;
D O I
10.1111/jcpt.13509
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
What is known and objective Prior to nasotracheal intubation (NTI), topical nasal vasoconstrictors are used to prevent NTI-related epistaxis (NTIRE). Since we learned that there is no significant increase in NTIRE among hypertensive patients undergoing NTI with adequate lubrication but without vasoconstrictors, we initiated this randomized controlled study to assess the necessity of vasoconstrictor use in reducing NTIRE. Methods Patients with the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification 1 and normal coagulation function, planned to undergo maxillofacial surgery with NTI were enrolled. Patients were randomly (1:1) assigned to each of the treatment groups: nasal treatment using pure oxybuprocaine gel with adequate lubrication (group G) or 1% ephedrine in addition to oxybuprocaine gel with adequate lubrication (group EG). In addition, the incidence and severity of NTIRE and intubation adjustments were studied. Results A total of 844 patients, 429 and 415 (groups G and EG, respectively), were included in the analysis. No significant differences were observed in the NTIRE incidence rates in groups G (28%) and EG (27%; p = 0.75, relative risk [RR] = 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70-1.29). No significant differences in the NTIRE incidence rates between the two nostrils were observed in both groups (group G: left, 27.9% vs. right, 28% [p = 0.98, RR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.67-1.51]; group EG: left, 25.8% vs. right, 27.9% [p = 0.63, RR = 1.12, 95% CI 0.72-1.73]. No significant difference was observed in the severity of NTIRE (p = 0.74). In case of difficult advancement of the endotracheal tube, NTIRE incidence was 71% vs. 12% with smooth intubation (p < 0.01, RR = 18.33, 95% CI 12.55-26.77). What is new and conclusion Well-lubricated nasotracheal intubation does not require pretreatment with ephedrine to reduce NTIRE.
引用
收藏
页码:1680 / 1686
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Difficult Airway Society guidelines for awake tracheal intubation (ATI) in adults
    Ahmad, I.
    El-Boghdadly, K.
    Bhagrath, R.
    Hodzovic, I.
    McNarry, A. F.
    Mir, F.
    O'Sullivan, E. P.
    Patel, A.
    Stacey, M.
    Vaughan, D.
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 2020, 75 (04) : 509 - 528
  • [2] Pathways through the nose for nasal intubation: a comparison of three endotracheal tubes
    Ahmed-Nusrath, A.
    Tong, J. L.
    Smith, J. E.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2008, 100 (02) : 269 - 274
  • [3] Which nostril should be used for nasotracheal intubation: the right or left? A randomized clinical trial
    Boku, Aiji
    Hanamoto, Hiroshi
    Hirose, Yohsuke
    Kudo, Chiho
    Morimoto, Yoshinari
    Sugimura, Mistutaka
    Niwa, Hitoshi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2014, 26 (05) : 390 - 394
  • [4] A comparison of McGrath MAC, Pentax AWS, and Macintosh direct laryngoscopes for nasotracheal intubation: a randomized controlled trial
    Chae, Yun Jeong
    Kim, Dae Hee
    Park, Eun Jeong
    Oh, Juyeon
    Yi, In Kyong
    [J]. THERAPEUTICS AND CLINICAL RISK MANAGEMENT, 2019, 15 : 1121 - 1128
  • [5] Chen Y H, 1996, Acta Anaesthesiol Sin, V34, P93
  • [6] The peri-operative complications of nasal intubation: a comparison of nostril side
    Coe, TR
    Human, M
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 2001, 56 (05) : 447 - 450
  • [7] COLE P, 1983, J OTOLARYNGOL, V12, P58
  • [8] Xylometazoline pretreatment reduces nasotracheal intubation-related epistaxis in paediatric dental surgery
    El-Seify, Z. A.
    Khattab, A. M.
    Shaaban, A. A.
    Metwalli, O. S.
    Hassan, H. E.
    Ajjoub, L. F.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2010, 105 (04) : 501 - 505
  • [9] Fleisher, 2014, MILLERS ANESTHESIA E, P1670
  • [10] Hussain S, 2014, PAK J MED HEALTH SCI, V8, P841