The Peer Reviewers' Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review

被引：127

作者：

Morey, Richard D. ^{[1
]}

Chambers, Christopher D. ^{[1
]}

Etchells, Peter J. ^{[2
]}

Harris, Christine R. ^{[3
]}

Hoekstra, Rink ^{[4
]}

Lakens, Daniel ^{[5
]}

Lewandowsky, Stephan ^{[6
,7
]}

Morey, Candice Coker ^{[8
]}

Newman, Daniel P. ^{[9
]}

Schoenbrodt, Felix D. ^{[10
]}

Vanpaemel, Wolf ^{[11
]}

Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan ^{[12
]}

Zwaan, Rolf A. ^{[13
]}

机构：

[1] Cardiff Univ, Cardiff CF10 3AX, S Glam, Wales

[2] Bath Spa Univ, Bath, Avon, England

[3] Univ Calif San Diego, San Diego, CA 92103 USA

[4] Univ Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands

[5] Eindhoven Univ Technol, POB 513, NL-5600 MB Eindhoven, Netherlands

[6] Univ Bristol, Bristol, Avon, England

[7] Univ Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia

[8] Univ Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland

[9] Monash Univ, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia

[10] Univ Munich, Munich, Germany

[11] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

[12] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands

[13] Erasmus Univ, Rotterdam, Netherlands

来源：

ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE | 2016年 / 3卷 / 01期

关键词：

science; transparency; open research; peer review; SCIENTISTS;

D O I：

10.1098/rsos.150547

中图分类号：

O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];

学科分类号：

07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;

摘要：

Openness is one of the central values of science. Open scientific practices such as sharing data, materials and analysis scripts alongside published articles have many benefits, including easier replication and extension studies, increased availability of data for theory-building and meta-analysis, and increased possibility of review and collaboration even after a paper has been published. Although modern information technology makes sharing easier than ever before, uptake of open practices had been slow. We suggest this might be in part due to a social dilemma arising from misaligned incentives and propose a specific, concrete mechanism-reviewers withholding comprehensive review-to achieve the goal of creating the expectation of open practices as a matter of scientific principle.

引用

页数：7

共 29 条

[21]

RStudio Inc, 2014, MARKD DYN DOC R R PA

[22] Empirical Study of Data Sharing by Authors Publishing in PLoS Journals [J].