Research performance of Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi

被引:4
作者
Mukundan, Ramina [1 ]
Narayanan, Nikesh [2 ]
机构
[1] Nazarbaev Univ, Univ Lib, Astana, Kazakhstan
[2] Khalifa Univ Sci & Technol, Univ Lib, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates
关键词
Scientometrics; Research impact; Citation analysis; Citespace; Research performance; Khalifa University; CITATION ANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1108/PMM-06-2019-0022
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Purpose Khalifa University of Science and Technology (KU) is one of the prominent Universities in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), of the Government of Abu Dhabi. The new Khalifa University was re-constituted in the year 2017 by merging three higher education institutions in Abu Dhabi, the Masdar Institute of Science and Technology, Khalifa University of Science, Technology and Research and the Petroleum Institute. The objectives of these institutions and their research areas were entirely disparate in the pre-merger era and hence the evaluation of the research performance of its pre-merged entities in the past is vital for Khalifa University to plan for the future course of actions. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach This study analyzes and visualizes scholarly publications of Khalifa University of Science and Technology (KU) using SCOPUS data. There are various qualitative and quantitative methods to measure research performance. This study adopted citation analysis, one of the widely recognized quantitative metrics to measure the citation impact of scholarly publications. Findings Khalifa University leads in productivity compared to other UAE universities but the citation impact of its publications is less in comparison to United Arab Emirates University and New York University, Abu Dhabi in terms of citations per publication. The majority of KU publications are not highly cited. The majority of the KU publications (80 percent) received fewer citations and few papers (20 percent of the KU publications) attracted 80 percent of the total citations received for KU publications. Analysis results indicate that publishing in top-ranked journals would improve the chance of getting more citations. On average, eight percentage difference is seen in the h-index of KU authors when removing self-citations. Originality/value This study is original research conducted to study the impact of research publications of Khalifa University using Scopus data.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 64
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Estimate of global research trends and performance in family therapy in Social Science Citation Index
    Yu-Chiung Lou
    Hsiao-Fang Lin
    Scientometrics, 2012, 90 : 807 - 823
  • [42] Research Performance in Stem Cell Science and Regenerative Medicine in Iran: A National Comprehensive Observation
    Saberi, Samaneh
    Karamzadeh, Razieh
    Moghadam, Parisa
    Kadivari, Morteza
    Behbahani, Bahareh Eghbal
    Heydari, Zahra
    Baharvand, Hossein
    Aminpour, Farzaneh
    Vosough, Massoud
    ARCHIVES OF IRANIAN MEDICINE, 2019, 22 (06) : 318 - 327
  • [43] Estimate of global research trends and performance in family therapy in Social Science Citation Index
    Lou, Yu-Chiung
    Lin, Hsiao-Fang
    SCIENTOMETRICS, 2012, 90 (03) : 807 - 823
  • [44] Science mapping the knowledge domain of energy performance research in the AEC industry: A scientometric analysis
    Azima, Mahshad
    Seyis, Senem
    ENERGY, 2023, 264
  • [45] Global research status in leading nuclear science and technology journals during 2001-2010 A bibliometric analysis based on ISI Web of Science
    Mardani, Amir Hosein
    Abdiazar, Shahram
    LIBRARY REVIEW, 2014, 63 (4-5) : 324 - 339
  • [46] Predicting institutional research performance from published indicators: A test of a classification of Australian university types
    Paul Ramsden
    Higher Education, 1999, 37 : 341 - 358
  • [47] Public versus private universities: Assessment of research performance; case study of the Spanish university system
    Casani, Fernando
    De Filippo, Daniela
    Garcia-Zorita, Carlos
    Sanz-Casado, Elias
    RESEARCH EVALUATION, 2014, 23 (01) : 48 - 61
  • [48] Do funding modes matter? A multilevel analysis of funding allocation mechanisms on university research performance
    Zacharewicz, Thomas
    Pavon, Noemi Pulido
    Martos, Luis Antonio Palma
    Lepori, Benedetto
    RESEARCH EVALUATION, 2023, 32 (03) : 545 - 556
  • [49] Assessment of Academic Research Output during 1996-2009: A Case Study of PEC University of Technology, Chandigarh
    Vasishta, Seema
    DESIDOC JOURNAL OF LIBRARY & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 31 (02): : 136 - 142
  • [50] The relationship between SCI editorial board representation and university research output in the field of computer science: A quantile regression approach
    Wang, Xing
    MALAYSIAN JOURNAL OF LIBRARY & INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2018, 23 (01) : 67 - 84