A big picture: bibliometric study of academic publications from post-Soviet countries

被引:46
作者
Chankseliani, Maia [1 ]
Lovakov, Andrey [2 ]
Pislyakov, Vladimir [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Dept Educ, 15 Norham Gardens, Oxford OX26PY, England
[2] HSE Univ, Ctr Inst Studies, 11 Pokrovsky Blvd, Moscow 109028, Russia
[3] HSE Univ, Lib, 11 Pokrovsky Blvd, Moscow 109028, Russia
基金
俄罗斯科学基金会;
关键词
Bibliometric analysis; Research output; Research impact; Quality of journals; Post-Soviet countries; International collaborations; Mega-collaborations; RUSSIAN RESEARCH OUTPUT; HIGHLY CITED PAPERS; INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATION; SCIENTIFIC OUTPUT; ESTONIAN SCIENCE; CITATION; TRENDS; IMPACT; INDICATORS; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1007/s11192-021-04124-5
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The world's largest community of scientists disintegrated following the dissolution of the Soviet Union. With extremely scarce resources and limited academic freedom as starting points, researchers in this region have been creating new knowledge; they have been building on rich scientific traditions in selected disciplines and, at times, paving new paths in non-traditional disciplines. At present, the cumulative contribution of post-Soviet countries to global research output is only three percent, indicating that these countries are not key players on the global research scene. This study uses bibliometric methods to offer novel empirical insight into the quantity and impact of academic publications; it also looks at the quality of journals in which the output is published. The findings reveal that fifteen post-Soviet countries differ considerably in terms of how much they have prioritised research, as well as the quantity, quality, and impact of their publications. The research productivity across the region has not been high and, taken together, these countries have produced publications of considerably lower quality and lower impact when viewed in the context of global research output. At the same time, researchers from post-Soviet countries tap into international collaborative networks actively, resulting in an exceptionally large proportion of publications from this region being internationally co-authored. In the historical context of Soviet research being known as one of the least collaborative globally, this finding indicates that researchers in the region are attractive to international collaborators and may be seeking such partnerships due to relatively modest research capacity at home.
引用
收藏
页码:8701 / 8730
页数:30
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]  
Adambekov S., 2016, Central Asian Journal of Global Health, V5
[2]   The fourth age of research [J].
Adams, Jonathan .
NATURE, 2013, 497 (7451) :557-560
[3]   A Criteria-based Assessment of the Coverage of Scopus and Web of Science [J].
Aksnes, Dag W. ;
Sivertsen, Gunnar .
JOURNAL OF DATA AND INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2019, 4 (01) :1-21
[4]   The effect of highly cited papers on national citation indicators [J].
Aksnes, DW ;
Sivertsen, G .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2004, 59 (02) :213-224
[5]  
Alimova N., 2020, EUROPEAN SCI EDITING, V46
[6]  
Allik J, 2015, P EST ACAD SCI, V64, P125
[7]   FACTORS AFFECTING BIBLIOMETRIC INDICATORS OF SCIENTIFIC QUALITY [J].
Allik, Jueri .
TRAMES-JOURNAL OF THE HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2013, 17 (03) :199-214
[8]   Quality of Estonian science estimated through bibliometric indicators (1997-2007) [J].
Allik, Jueri .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ESTONIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 2008, 57 (04) :255-264
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2006, KNOWLEDGE POWER DISS, P41
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Academic governance-disciplines and policy