Early-stage material selection based on life cycle approach: tools, obstacles and opportunities for design

被引:27
作者
Pollini, Barbara [1 ]
Rognoli, Valentina [1 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Milan, Design Dept, Via G Durando, I-20158 Milan, Italy
关键词
LCA-based Material Selection Tools; Material LCA; Sustainable Design; Life cycle assessment; materials for sustainable design; materials selection; SUSTAINABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.spc.2021.07.014
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Material selection plays an essential role in environmental product performances; however, choice and comparison between different materials' environmental features are not trivial for designers. Academic and grey literature reviews were used to provide an overview of the main types of software, using a life cycle approach, supporting material selection decisions since the early design stages, highlighting pros and cons of the different tools from a designer's perspective. Three main typologies of software emerged from the study, defined by different usability and completeness degrees. Obstacles and opportunities were noted on four main aspects which influence the choice of the most sustainable material: on the educational level, on the analysis level, on the material selection level, and on a system level. Tools for in depth LCA can be used for material selection; although difficult for designers to use, these software are essential to create a more critical awareness for the application of both conventional and new materials. Simplified LCA Tools with limited impact categories, and simplified tools explicitly dedicated to material selection from a life cycle thinking perspective, better respond to the usability needs of designers, who must, however, consider the limits of precision of these tools, combining their use with a life cycle design approach and applying ecodesign strategies. To date, little effort has been made to integrate such tools properly in the design practice; therefore, multidisciplinarity between LCA experts and designers is strongly recommended, especially to avoid misleading aspects in assessing the growing number of materials that tend to be considered a key for sustainable innovation. (C) 2021 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1130 / 1139
页数:10
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2020, 98 COM
[2]   Life cycle environmental benefits of a forward-thinking design phase for buildings: the case study of a temporary pavilion built for an international exhibition [J].
Arrigoni, Alessandro ;
Zucchinelli, Maria ;
Collatina, Davide ;
Dotelli, Giovanni .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 187 :974-983
[3]  
Asbjorn Sorensen Charlotte Jagtap, 2016, 18 INT C ENG PROD DE
[4]  
Ashby M., 2008, CES EDUPACK ECOAUDIT
[5]  
Ashby M.F., 2016, MAT SUSTAINABLE DEV, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-08- 100176- 9.000 02-5, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-08-100176-9.00002-5]
[6]  
Ashby MF., 2009, Materials and the environment: eco-informed material choice
[7]  
Bak-Andersen M., 2021, Reintroducing Materials for Sustainable Design, DOI [10.4324/9781003109525, DOI 10.4324/9781003109525]
[8]  
Baumann H., 2004, HITCH HIKERS GUID LC
[9]  
BREZET H., 1997, UNEP IE IND ENV, V20, P21
[10]  
Brezet J.C., 1997, Ecodesign: a promising approach to sustainable production and consumption