Supramalleolar osteotomy for the treatment of distal tibial angular deformities and arthritis of the ankle joint

被引:140
作者
Stamatis, ED
Cooper, PS
Myerson, MS
机构
[1] Union Mem Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Baltimore, MD USA
[2] Georgetown Univ, Med Ctr, Washington, DC 20007 USA
关键词
ankle; arthritis; malalignment; osteotomy; tibia;
D O I
10.1177/107110070302401004
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
In a 5-year period (1996-2001), the authors performed supramalleolar osteotomies for the correction of distal tibial mechanical malalignment of at least 10degrees with concomitant pain and with or without radiographic evidence of arthritic changes. The method was also applied as an alternative to other common procedures for the treatment of a small group of patients with degenerative changes of the ankle joint without previous traumatic event and with minimal or moderately altered alignment. There were 12 patients (113 feet) with an average follow-up of 33.6 months. All osteotomies healed at an average time of 14 weeks. The average AOFAS score improved from 53.8 to 87 points, the average ankle score in the scale described by Takakura et al. improved from 56.7 to 82, and the average pain score improved from 14.6 to 32.3. In the presence of deformity, the average tibial-ankle surface angles in both the coronal and the sagittal planes were significantly improved. The radiographic degenerative changes in the ankle joint showed no evidence of progression. The choice of technique did not influence the clinical or radiographic outcome or the healing time of the osteotomy.
引用
收藏
页码:754 / 764
页数:11
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Supramalleolar osteotomy for ankle valgus in myelomeningocele [J].
Abraham, E ;
Lubicky, JP ;
Songer, MN ;
Millar, EA .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 1996, 16 (06) :774-781
[2]  
ACEVEDO JI, 1999, FOOT ANKLE CLIN, V4, P409
[3]  
Canale S T, 1981, Instr Course Lect, V30, P85
[4]  
Graehl P M, 1987, J Orthop Trauma, V1, P281, DOI 10.1097/00005131-198701040-00003
[5]  
HEYWOOD AWB, 1983, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P76
[6]   CLINICAL RATING SYSTEMS FOR THE ANKLE-HINDFOOT, MIDFOOT, HALLUX, AND LESSER TOES [J].
KITAOKA, HB ;
ALEXANDER, IJ ;
ADELAAR, RS ;
NUNLEY, JA ;
MYERSON, MS ;
SANDERS, M .
FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 1994, 15 (07) :349-353
[7]   NO ARTHROSIS OF THE ANKLE 20 YEARS AFTER MALALIGNED TIBIAL-SHAFT FRACTURE [J].
KRISTENSEN, KD ;
KIAER, T ;
BLICHER, J .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1989, 60 (02) :208-209
[8]  
Mangone P G, 2001, Foot Ankle Clin, V6, P583, DOI 10.1016/S1083-7515(03)00115-3
[9]   DISABILITY OF HINDFOOT AFTER FRACTURE OF TIBIAL SHAFT [J].
MCMASTER, M .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1976, 58 (01) :90-93
[10]   SUPRAMALLEOLAR DEROTATION OSTEOTOMY FOR LATERAL TIBIAL TORSION AND ASSOCIATED EQUINOVARUS DEFORMITY OF THE FOOT [J].
MCNICOL, D ;
LEONG, JCY ;
HSU, LCS .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1983, 65 (02) :166-170